| Literature DB >> 29097352 |
Alexandra Nunn1, Rik Crutzen2, Devon Haag1, Cathy Chabot3, Anna Carson3, Gina Ogilvie1,3,4, Jean Shoveller3, Mark Gilbert1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Web-based sexual health resources are typically evaluated in terms of their efficacy. Information is lacking about how sexual health promotion websites are perceived and used. It is essential to understand website use to address challenges with adherence and attrition to Web-based health interventions. An existing theoretical framework for examining loyalty to electronic health (eHealth) interventions has been not yet been applied in the context of sexual health promotion nor has the association between e-loyalty and intended intervention efficacy outcomes been investigated.Entities:
Keywords: Internet; cross-sectional studies; e-loyalty; patient satisfaction; sexual health
Year: 2017 PMID: 29097352 PMCID: PMC5691242 DOI: 10.2196/publichealth.5393
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill ISSN: 2369-2960
E-loyalty user perceptions.
| Model | Explanation | Survey itema | |
| Intention to visit again (return) | I would use this website again. | ||
| Recommend to others | I would recommend this website to others. | ||
| Effectiveness | Quality and relevance of the information | The website provided me with relevant information about sexual health. | |
| Efficiency | Easy search of and access to information | I was able to access the information quickly on this website. | |
| Trustworthiness | Believability of the provided information | I trusted the information presented on this website. | |
| Active trust | Confidence in acting on the provided information | I would act upon the information presented on this website. | |
| Overall experience | Positive perception of the website | Based on today’s visit, how would you rate your SSR experience overall? (7-point Likert scale from very poor to very good) | |
| Understanding | I found the information easy to understand. | ||
| Knowledge increase | As a result of visiting SmartSexResource, my knowledge about STIs or sexual health has increased. | ||
| Behavioral intent #1 | As a result of visiting SmartSexResource, I am more likely to have safer sex. | ||
| Behavioral intent #2 | As a result of visiting SmartSexResource, I am more likely to get tested for HIVb or STIsc. | ||
aUnless otherwise specified, the question was answered on a 7-point Likert scale from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7).
bHIV: human immunodeficiency virus.
cSTIs: sexually transmitted infections.
Sample characteristics for SmartSexResource visitor survey 2014, n=173.
| Characteristic | Clients | Providers | Total | |
| n (%)b | n (%)b | n (%)b | ||
| <20 | 16 (15) | 1 (3) | 17 (12) | |
| 20-29 | 41 (38) | 8 (21) | 49 (34) | |
| 30-39 | 22 (21) | 10 (26) | 32 (22) | |
| 40-49 | 11(10) | 10 (26) | 21 (14) | |
| >50 | 17 (16) | 9 (24) | 26 (18) | |
| Totala | 107 | 38 | 145 | |
| Female (woman) | 55 (58) | 31 (82) | 86 (65) | |
| Male (man) | 38 (40) | 5 (13) | 43 (32) | |
| Transgender | 2 (2) | 0 (0) | 2 (2) | |
| Genderqueer | 0 (0) | 2 (5) | 2 (2) | |
| Totala | 95 | 38 | 133 | |
| Primary | 5 (5) | 0 (0) | 5 (3) | |
| Secondary | 28 (26) | 1 (3) | 29 (20) | |
| College or university | 59 (55) | 21 (54) | 80 (54) | |
| Graduate level | 16 (15) | 17 (43) | 33 (22) | |
| Totala | 108 | 39 | 147 | |
| Canada | 97 (74) | 39 (95) | 136 (79) | |
| International | 34 (26) | 2 (5) | 36 (21) | |
| Totala | 131 | 41 | 172 | |
aTotal represents the data available (ie, excluding missing values) or number of respondents to the survey question.
bPercentage is the proportion of respondents who answered the survey question (ie, excluding missing values).
Summary of outcome and user perception ratings for SmartSexResource visitor survey 2014.
| Measure | Mean rating by visitor type (scale: 1-7a) | |||
| Client (n=131) | Provider (n=42) | |||
| E-loyalty | 5.62 | 6.52 | <.001 | |
| Return | 5.78 | 6.51 | <.001 | |
| Recommend | 5.50 | 6.54 | <.001 | |
| Overall | 5.59 | 6.14 | .004 | |
| Effectiveness | 5.78 | 6.17 | .008 | |
| Efficiency | 5.73 | 5.98 | .15 | |
| Understanding | 5.85 | 6.50 | <.001 | |
| Trustworthiness | 5.78 | 6.64 | <.001 | |
| Active trust | 5.79 | 6.52 | <.001 | |
aScale: 1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=somewhat disagree, 4=neutral, 5=somewhat agree, 6=agree, 7=strongly agree.
Correlation matrix and mean user perception ratings, clients and providers (n=173).
| Measure | Mean | SDa | 1 | 1a | 1b | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| 5.84 | 1.28 | - | .90 | .96 | .61 | .56 | .56 | .72 | .79 | .79 | ||
| a. Return | 5.96 | 1.25 | - | .77 | .63 | .56 | .57 | .67 | .71 | .73 | ||
| b. Recommend | 5.74 | 1.39 | - | .56 | .54 | .52 | .70 | .81 | .77 | |||
| 2. Overall experience | 5.72 | 1.11 | - | .67 | .59 | .57 | .56 | .55 | ||||
| 3. Effectiveness | 5.87 | 0.96 | - | .61 | .57 | .50 | .55 | |||||
| 4. Efficiency | 5.79 | 1.16 | - | .64 | .50 | .53 | ||||||
| 5. Understanding | 6.01 | 0.95 | - | .68 | .72 | |||||||
| 6. Trustworthiness | 5.99 | 1.08 | - | .86 | ||||||||
| 7. Active trust | 5.97 | 1.08 | - | |||||||||
aSD: standard deviation.
Figure 1Structural equation model for the relationships between five user perceptions and e-loyalty. (Note: Numbers next to paths indicate standardized estimates, standard errors, and P values).