Literature DB >> 29096883

Influence of the Quantity of Aortic Valve Calcium on the Agreement Between Automated 3-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography and Multidetector Row Computed Tomography for Aortic Annulus Sizing.

Tomaz Podlesnikar1, Edgard A Prihadi1, Philippe J van Rosendael1, E Mara Vollema1, Frank van der Kley1, Arend de Weger2, Nina Ajmone Marsan1, Franjo Naji3, Zlatko Fras4, Jeroen J Bax1, Victoria Delgado5.   

Abstract

Accurate aortic annulus sizing is key for selection of appropriate transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) prosthesis size. The present study compared novel automated 3-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) software and multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) for aortic annulus sizing and investigated the influence of the quantity of aortic valve calcium (AVC) on the selection of TAVI prosthesis size. A total of 83 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI were evaluated. Maximal and minimal aortic annulus diameter, perimeter, and area were measured. AVC was assessed with computed tomography. The low and high AVC burden groups were defined according to the median AVC score. Overall, 3D TEE measurements slightly underestimated the aortic annulus dimensions as compared with MDCT (mean differences between maximum, minimum diameter, perimeter, and area: -1.7 mm, 0.5 mm, -2.7 mm, and -13 mm2, respectively). The agreement between 3D TEE and MDCT on aortic annulus dimensions was superior among patients with low AVC burden (<3,025 arbitrary units) compared with patients with high AVC burden (≥3,025 arbitrary units). The interobserver variability was excellent for both methods. 3D TEE and MDCT led to the same prosthesis size selection in 88%, 95%, and 81% of patients in the total population, the low, and the high AVC burden group, respectively. In conclusion, the novel automated 3D TEE imaging software allows accurate and highly reproducible measurements of the aortic annulus dimensions and shows excellent agreement with MDCT to determine the TAVI prosthesis size, particularly in patients with low AVC burden.
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29096883     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  Optimal pre-TAVR annulus sizing in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: area-derived perimeter by CT is the best-correlated measure with intraoperative sizing.

Authors:  Yuan Wang; Moyang Wang; Guanyuan Song; Wei Wang; Bin Lv; Hao Wang; Yongjian Wu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Aortic annulus measurement with computed tomography angiography reduces aortic regurgitation after transfemoral aortic valve replacement compared to 3-D echocardiography: a single-centre experience.

Authors:  Nadja Wystub; Laura Bäz; Sven Möbius-Winkler; Tudor C Pörner; Björn Goebel; Ali Hamadanchi; Torsten Doenst; Julia Grimm; Lukas Lehmkuhl; Ulf Teichgräber; P Christian Schulze; Marcus Franz
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  Imaging of Valvular Heart Disease in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Tomaz Podlesnikar; Victoria Delgado; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2018-08

4.  Utility of conventional aortic root shot angiography for SAPIEN 3 prosthesis sizing in TAVI: feasibility and inter-reader variability.

Authors:  Laura Gansera; Bernhard Ulm; Peter Bramlage; Stephan Krapf; Frank Oertel; Tobias Mueller-Honold; Wolfgang von Scheidt; Christian Thilo
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-12-29

Review 5.  Aortic Annular Sizing Using Novel Software in Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chanrith Mork; Minjie Wei; Weixi Jiang; Jianli Ren; Haitao Ran
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.