Literature DB >> 29096725

Review: To be or not to be an identifiable model. Is this a relevant question in animal science modelling?

R Muñoz-Tamayo1, L Puillet1, J B Daniel1, D Sauvant1, O Martin1, M Taghipoor2, P Blavy1.   

Abstract

What is a good (useful) mathematical model in animal science? For models constructed for prediction purposes, the question of model adequacy (usefulness) has been traditionally tackled by statistical analysis applied to observed experimental data relative to model-predicted variables. However, little attention has been paid to analytic tools that exploit the mathematical properties of the model equations. For example, in the context of model calibration, before attempting a numerical estimation of the model parameters, we might want to know if we have any chance of success in estimating a unique best value of the model parameters from available measurements. This question of uniqueness is referred to as structural identifiability; a mathematical property that is defined on the sole basis of the model structure within a hypothetical ideal experiment determined by a setting of model inputs (stimuli) and observable variables (measurements). Structural identifiability analysis applied to dynamic models described by ordinary differential equations (ODEs) is a common practice in control engineering and system identification. This analysis demands mathematical technicalities that are beyond the academic background of animal science, which might explain the lack of pervasiveness of identifiability analysis in animal science modelling. To fill this gap, in this paper we address the analysis of structural identifiability from a practitioner perspective by capitalizing on the use of dedicated software tools. Our objectives are (i) to provide a comprehensive explanation of the structural identifiability notion for the community of animal science modelling, (ii) to assess the relevance of identifiability analysis in animal science modelling and (iii) to motivate the community to use identifiability analysis in the modelling practice (when the identifiability question is relevant). We focus our study on ODE models. By using illustrative examples that include published mathematical models describing lactation in cattle, we show how structural identifiability analysis can contribute to advancing mathematical modelling in animal science towards the production of useful models and, moreover, highly informative experiments via optimal experiment design. Rather than attempting to impose a systematic identifiability analysis to the modelling community during model developments, we wish to open a window towards the discovery of a powerful tool for model construction and experiment design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dynamic modelling; identifiability; model calibration; optimal experiment design; parameter identification

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29096725     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731117002774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  11 in total

1.  Potential of Integrating Model-Based Design of Experiments Approaches and Process Analytical Technologies for Bioprocess Scale-Down.

Authors:  Peter Neubauer; Emmanuel Anane; Stefan Junne; Mariano Nicolas Cruz Bournazou
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.635

Review 2.  ASAS-NANP symposium: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: limitations and potential next steps for modeling and modelers in the animal sciences.

Authors:  Marc Jacobs; Aline Remus; Charlotte Gaillard; Hector M Menendez; Luis O Tedeschi; Suresh Neethirajan; Jennifer L Ellis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

3.  Full observability and estimation of unknown inputs, states and parameters of nonlinear biological models.

Authors:  Alejandro F Villaverde; Nikolaos Tsiantis; Julio R Banga
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Addressing Global Ruminant Agricultural Challenges Through Understanding the Rumen Microbiome: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Sharon A Huws; Christopher J Creevey; Linda B Oyama; Itzhak Mizrahi; Stuart E Denman; Milka Popova; Rafael Muñoz-Tamayo; Evelyne Forano; Sinead M Waters; Matthias Hess; Ilma Tapio; Hauke Smidt; Sophie J Krizsan; David R Yáñez-Ruiz; Alejandro Belanche; Leluo Guan; Robert J Gruninger; Tim A McAllister; C Jamie Newbold; Rainer Roehe; Richard J Dewhurst; Tim J Snelling; Mick Watson; Garret Suen; Elizabeth H Hart; Alison H Kingston-Smith; Nigel D Scollan; Rodolpho M do Prado; Eduardo J Pilau; Hilario C Mantovani; Graeme T Attwood; Joan E Edwards; Neil R McEwan; Steven Morrisson; Olga L Mayorga; Christopher Elliott; Diego P Morgavi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Monte Carlo Simulations for the Analysis of Non-linear Parameter Confidence Intervals in Optimal Experimental Design.

Authors:  Niels Krausch; Tilman Barz; Annina Sawatzki; Mathis Gruber; Sarah Kamel; Peter Neubauer; Mariano Nicolas Cruz Bournazou
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-05-24

6.  Towards the quantitative characterisation of piglets' robustness to weaning: a modelling approach.

Authors:  M Revilla; N C Friggens; L P Broudiscou; G Lemonnier; F Blanc; L Ravon; M J Mercat; Y Billon; C Rogel-Gaillard; N Le Floch; J Estellé; R Muñoz-Tamayo
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A procedure to quantify the feed intake response of growing pigs to perturbations.

Authors:  H Nguyen-Ba; J van Milgen; M Taghipoor
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A novel modelling approach to quantify the response of dairy goats to a high-concentrate diet.

Authors:  Masoomeh Taghipoor; Maud Delattre; Sylvie Giger-Reverdin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Perspective on the Importance of Parameter Identifiability.

Authors:  Anna Sher; Steven A Niederer; Gary R Mirams; Anna Kirpichnikova; Richard Allen; Pras Pathmanathan; David J Gavaghan; Piet H van der Graaf; Denis Noble
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  Hydrogenotrophic methanogens of the mammalian gut: Functionally similar, thermodynamically different-A modelling approach.

Authors:  Rafael Muñoz-Tamayo; Milka Popova; Maxence Tillier; Diego P Morgavi; Jean-Pierre Morel; Gérard Fonty; Nicole Morel-Desrosiers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.