| Literature DB >> 29095824 |
Calistus Wilunda1, Giovanni Dall'Oglio2, Chiara Scanagatta3, Giulia Segafredo3, Bhekumusa Wellington Lukhele4, Risa Takahashi5, Giovanni Putoto3, Fabio Manenti3, Ana Pilar Betrán6.
Abstract
Effective from May 2014, community-based traditional birth attendants (TBAs) in Yirol West County, South Sudan, were directed to start referring all women in labour to health facilities for childbirth instead of assisting them in the villages. This study aimed to understand the degree of integration of TBAs in the health system, to reveal the factors influencing the integration, and to explore the perceived solutions to the challenges faced by TBAs. A qualitative study utilising 11 focus group discussions with TBAs, 6 focus group discussions with women, and 18 key informant interviews with members of village health committees, staff of health facilities, and staff of the County Health Department was conducted. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. The study found that many TBAs were referring women to health facilities for delivery, but some were still attending to deliveries at home. Facilitators of the adoption of the new role by TBAs were: acceptance of the new TBAs' role by the community, women and TBAs, perceptions about institutional childbirth and risks of home childbirth, personal commitment and motivation by some TBAs, a good working relationship between community-based TBAs and health facility staff, availability of incentives for women at health facilities, and training of TBAs. Challenges of integrating TBAs in the health system included, among others, communication problems between TBAs and health care facilities, delays in seeking care by women, insecurity, lack of materials and supplies for TBAs, health system constraints, insufficient incentives for TBAs, long distances to health facilities and transportation problems. This study has revealed encouraging developments in TBAs' integration in the formal health system in Yirol West. However, there is need to address the challenges faced by TBAs in assuming their new role in order to sustain the integration.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29095824 PMCID: PMC5667815 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185726
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The number of focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and participants.
FGD: focus group discussion; KII: key informant interview; PHCC: primary health care centre; PHCU Primary health care unit; TBA: traditional birth attendant.
Characteristics of women who participated in focus group discussions.
| Characteristic | Frequency (n = 94) | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Age group | ||
| 18–19 | 9 | 9.6 |
| 20–24 | 24 | 25.5 |
| 25–29 | 23 | 24.5 |
| 30–34 | 24 | 25.5 |
| >34 | 10 | 10.6 |
| Missing data | 4 | 4.3 |
| Parity | ||
| 1–2 | 26 | 27.7 |
| 3–4 | 28 | 29.8 |
| 5–6 | 30 | 31.9 |
| >6 | 10 | 10.6 |
| Educational level | ||
| None | 89 | 94.7 |
| Primary | 5 | 5.3 |
| Marital status | ||
| Currently married | 88 | 93.6 |
| Never/formerly married | 6 | 6.4 |
| Attended ANC during last pregnancy | ||
| Yes | 91 | 96.8 |
| No | 3 | 3.2 |
| Delivered in a health facility | ||
| Yes | 40 | 42.6 |
| No | 54 | 57.4 |
Characteristics of traditional birth attendants who participated in focus group discussions.
| Characteristic | Facility-based TBAs (n = 15) | Community-based integrated TBAs (n = 59) | TBAs not-integrated (n = 16) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | % | Frequency | % | Frequency | % | |
| Age group | ||||||
| <35 | 2 | 13.3 | 8 | 13.6 | 5 | 31.2 |
| 35–49 | 5 | 33.3 | 30 | 50.8 | 11 | 68.8 |
| >49 | 4 | 26.7 | 13 | 22.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Missing data | 4 | 26.7 | 8 | 13.6 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Married | 9 | 60.0 | 34 | 57.6 | 6 | 37.5 |
| Formerly married | 6 | 40.0 | 25 | 42.4 | 10 | 62.5 |
| Education | ||||||
| None | 15 | 100 | 58 | 98.3 | 16 | 100 |
| Primary | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1.7 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Period working as a TBA | ||||||
| <10 years | 4 | 26.7 | 40 | 67.8 | 9 | 56.2 |
| 10–19 years | 6 | 40.0 | 12 | 20.3 | 7 | 43.8 |
| >19 years | 5 | 33.3 | 7 | 11.9 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Referring women to health facilities | ||||||
| Yes | — | — | 58 | 98.3 | 5 | 31.2 |
| No | — | — | 1 | 1.7 | 11 | 68.8 |
| Attending to home births | ||||||
| Yes | — | — | 42 | 71.2 | 16 | 100 |
| No | — | — | 17 | 28.8 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Trained by CUAMM/CHD | ||||||
| Yes | — | — | 46 | 78.0 | 3 | 18.8 |
| No | — | — | 13 | 22.0 | 13 | 81.2 |
Facilitators of adoption of new role by traditional birth attendants.
| Theme | Main points |
|---|---|
| Acceptance of the new role of TBAs | Referral of women to health facilities was acceptable to the community, women, and TBAs Women felt safer to be accompanied by TBAs to health facilities TBAs were happy to be contributing towards improving maternal health TBAs were motivated by a feeling of being part of the formal health system |
| Perceptions about the care in health facilities and the risks of childbirth at home | Institutional childbirth was perceived to be safer than home childbirth Women were satisfied with the care provided in health facilities Women perceived home childbirth by TBAs to be of poorer quality TBAs perceived to be at risk of infection through contact with body fluids during delivery TBAs perceived home delivery to be risky to the mother and her baby TBAs were afraid of facing consequences in case of death or morbidity of the mother and/or baby |
| Personal commitment and motivation among TBAs | The spirit of serving the community and improving maternal health, with or without incentives among some TBAs |
| Relationship between community-based integrated TBAs and health facility staff | A good working relationship between community-based integrated TBAs, CHWs in PHCUs and facility-based TBAs CHWs viewed TBAs as co-workers CHWs were involved in training TBAs CHWs helped TBAs in completing monthly reports |
| The role of baby kits at health facilities | Women delivering in health facility were rewarded with baby kits The kits were synergistic to the work of TBAs |
| The role of training | Influence of the training from CHD/CUAMM and on-job from CHW and other health workers |
Challenges faced by traditional birth attendants in adopting their new role.
| Theme | Main points |
|---|---|
| Problems in communicating with health facilities | TBAs lacked mobile phones, money to buy airtime, and means to charge their phones Lack or poor mobile phone network Some TBAs lacked the contact phone numbers of health facilities |
| Distance to health facilities and transportation problems | Some villages were located in remote villages which hampered referral. TBAs lacked means of transportation and walked to collect data, mobilise communities, and accompany women to health facilities. Ambulance and motorcycles could not access many parts of the county because of poor roads Motorcycles were not preferred by women in labour |
| Insecurity | TBAs could not escort women to health facilities due to conflicts and fear of wild animals Insecurity affected ambulance and motorcycles movement |
| Delays in seeking care by women | TBAs attended to home deliveries because women sought help when at an advanced stage of labour |
| Lack of materials and supplies for TBAs | TBAs lacked basic supplies such as torches, raincoats, gumboots and bags TBAs lacked basic supplies to assist women in case of urgent childbirth |
| Health system constraints | Lack of qualified staff in PHCUs and PHCCs Infrastructural limitations to handle deliveries at PHCUs and PHCCs |
| Insufficient monetary incentive/loss of income and other incentives | The monthly incentive of 12 South Sudanese Pounds received by TBAs considered to be too low and did not match the workload and cost of living TBAs were no longer getting the incentives they used to get when assisting home births. The community considered TBAs to be employed and thus was not obliged to give any anything extra to them |
| Insufficient/lack of training | TBAs not been trained/insufficiently trained. Some TBAs had not understood the rationale for referring women to health facilities |
| Lack of a common understanding among health staff about the new role of TBAs | Some CHWs thought that the role of community-based integrated TBAs was to attend to deliveries at home and to refer only complicated cases. This can be misleading information to TBAs |
Addressing the challenges faced by traditional birth attendants in adopting their new role.
| Theme | Main points |
|---|---|
| Provision of a salary | The current TBAs’ monthly incentive should be increased |
| Training and supervision | Regular training/refresher training Supervising TBAs to ensure that they are performing their role and to identify and address their challenges |
| Addressing transport and communication problems | Providing TBAs with bicycles |
| Improving the health facility infrastructure | Constructing more health facilities Allocating more space for maternity at the existing PHCUs and PHCCs and providing more maternity beds |
| Providing supplies and equipment to TBAs | Providing basic supplies such as raincoats, gumboots, torches, soap, umbrellas and bags Providing clean delivery kits to TBAs for use in attending to urgent deliveries Providing uniforms to TBAs |