Literature DB >> 17636799

Traditional birth attendant training for improving health behaviours and pregnancy outcomes.

L M Sibley1, T A Sipe, C M Brown, M M Diallo, K McNatt, N Habarta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Between the 1970s and 1990s, the World Health Organization promoted traditional birth attendant (TBA) training as one strategy to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality. To date, evidence in support of TBA training remains limited and conflicting.
OBJECTIVES: To assess effects of TBA training on health behaviours and pregnancy outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Trials Registers of the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group and Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC) (June 2006); electronic databases representing fields of education, social, and health sciences (inception to June 2006); the internet; and contacted experts. SELECTION CRITERIA: Published and unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCT), controlled before/after and interrupted time series studies comparing trained and untrained TBAs or women cared for/living in areas served by TBAs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. MAIN
RESULTS: Four studies, involving over 2000 TBAs and nearly 27,000 women, are included. One cluster-randomized trial found significantly lower rates in the intervention group regarding stillbirths (adjusted OR 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.83, P < 0.001), perinatal death rate (adjusted OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.83, P < 0.001) and neonatal death rate (adjusted OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.82, P < 0.001). Maternal death rate was lower but not significant (adjusted OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.22, P = 0.24) while referral rates were significantly higher (adjusted OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.90, P < 0.001). A controlled before/after study among women who were referred to a health service found perinatal deaths decreased in both intervention and control groups with no significant difference between groups (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.76, P = 0.95). Similarly, the mean number of monthly referrals did not differ between groups (P = 0.321). One RCT found a significant difference in advice about introduction of complementary foods (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.90, P = 0.02) but no significant difference for immediate feeding of colostrum (OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.62 to 3.03, P = 0.44). Another RCT found no significant differences in frequency of postpartum haemorrhage (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.17, P = 0.60) among women cared for by trained versus TBAs. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: The potential of TBA training to reduce peri-neonatal mortality is promising when combined with improved health services. However, the number of studies meeting the inclusion criteria is insufficient to provide the evidence base needed to establish training effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17636799     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005460.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  45 in total

Review 1.  60 Million non-facility births: who can deliver in community settings to reduce intrapartum-related deaths?

Authors:  Gary L Darmstadt; Anne C C Lee; Simon Cousens; Lynn Sibley; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; France Donnay; Dave Osrin; Abhay Bang; Vishwajeet Kumar; Steven N Wall; Abdullah Baqui; Joy E Lawn
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Childbirth education in rural haiti: reviving low-tech teaching strategies.

Authors:  Martha Gibson; Betty Carlson Bowles; Lauren Jansen; Jane Leach
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

3.  Community perceptions towards the new role of traditional birth attendants as birth companions and nutrition advocates in Kakamega County, Kenya.

Authors:  Esther L Anono; Sophie Ochola; Salome Wawire; Irene Ogada; Crispin Ndedda; Jacqueline K Kung'u
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Perinatal interventions and survival in resource-poor settings: which work, which don't, which have the jury out?

Authors:  David Osrin; Audrey Prost
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 5.  Traditional birth attendant training for improving health behaviours and pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Lynn M Sibley; Theresa Ann Sipe; Danika Barry
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15

Review 6.  Traditional birth attendants and birth outcomes in low-middle income countries: A review.

Authors:  Ana Garces; Elizabeth M McClure; Leopoldo Espinoza; Sarah Saleem; Lester Figueroa; Sherri Bucher; Robert L Goldenberg
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.300

7.  Improving newborn survival in low-income countries: community-based approaches and lessons from South Asia.

Authors:  Nirmala Nair; Prasanta Tripathy; Audrey Prost; Anthony Costello; David Osrin
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Why do some women still prefer traditional birth attendants and home delivery?: a qualitative study on delivery care services in West Java Province, Indonesia.

Authors:  Christiana R Titaley; Cynthia L Hunter; Michael J Dibley; Peter Heywood
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  Delivering interventions to reduce the global burden of stillbirths: improving service supply and community demand.

Authors:  Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Gary L Darmstadt; Rachel A Haws; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Joy E Lawn
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Improving maternal survival in South Asia--what can we learn from case studies?

Authors:  Barbara McPake; Marge Koblinsky
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.