Fien Mertens1, Esther de Groot2, Loes Meijer2, Johan Wens3, Mary Gemma Cherry4, Myriam Deveugele1, Roger Damoiseaux2, Ann Stes5, Peter Pype1. 1. a Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care , Ghent University , Gent , Belgium. 2. b The Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care , University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , The Netherlands. 3. c Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care Antwerp , University of Antwerp , Antwerp , Belgium. 4. d Psychology of Healthcare Research Group, Department of Psychological Sciences , Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK. 5. e Antwerp School of Education, Centre for Excellence in Higher Education , University of Antwerp , Antwerp , Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Changes in healthcare practice toward more proactive clinical, organizational and interprofessional working require primary healthcare professionals to learn continuously from each other through collaboration. This systematic review uses realist methodology to consolidate knowledge on the characteristics of workplace learning (WPL) through collaboration by primary healthcare professionals. METHODS: Following several scoping searches, five electronic bibliographic databases were searched from January 1990 to December 2015 for relevant gray and published literature written in English, French, German and Dutch. Reviewers worked in pairs to identify relevant articles. A set of statements, based on the findings of our scoping searches, was used as a coding tree to analyze the papers. Interpretation of the results was done in alternating pairs, discussed within the author group and triangulated with stakeholders' views. RESULTS: Out of 6930 references, we included 42 publications that elucidated who, when, how and what primary healthcare professionals learn through collaboration. Papers were both qualitative and quantitative in design, and focused largely on WPL of collaborating general practitioners and nurses. No striking differences between different professionals within primary healthcare were noted. Professionals were often unaware of the learning that occurs through collaboration. WPL happened predominantly through informal discussions about patient cases and modeling for other professionals. Any professionals could both learn and facilitate others' learning. Outcomes were diverse, but contextualized knowledge seemed to be important. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSIONS: Primary care professionals' WPL is multifaceted. Existing social constructivist and social cognitivist learning theories form a framework from which to interpret these findings. Primary care policy makers and managers should ensure that professionals have access to protected time, earmarked for learning. Time is required for reflection, to learn new ways of interaction and to develop new habits within clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Changes in healthcare practice toward more proactive clinical, organizational and interprofessional working require primary healthcare professionals to learn continuously from each other through collaboration. This systematic review uses realist methodology to consolidate knowledge on the characteristics of workplace learning (WPL) through collaboration by primary healthcare professionals. METHODS: Following several scoping searches, five electronic bibliographic databases were searched from January 1990 to December 2015 for relevant gray and published literature written in English, French, German and Dutch. Reviewers worked in pairs to identify relevant articles. A set of statements, based on the findings of our scoping searches, was used as a coding tree to analyze the papers. Interpretation of the results was done in alternating pairs, discussed within the author group and triangulated with stakeholders' views. RESULTS: Out of 6930 references, we included 42 publications that elucidated who, when, how and what primary healthcare professionals learn through collaboration. Papers were both qualitative and quantitative in design, and focused largely on WPL of collaborating general practitioners and nurses. No striking differences between different professionals within primary healthcare were noted. Professionals were often unaware of the learning that occurs through collaboration. WPL happened predominantly through informal discussions about patient cases and modeling for other professionals. Any professionals could both learn and facilitate others' learning. Outcomes were diverse, but contextualized knowledge seemed to be important. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSIONS: Primary care professionals' WPL is multifaceted. Existing social constructivist and social cognitivist learning theories form a framework from which to interpret these findings. Primary care policy makers and managers should ensure that professionals have access to protected time, earmarked for learning. Time is required for reflection, to learn new ways of interaction and to develop new habits within clinical practice.
Authors: Pauline Boeckxstaens; Judith Belle Brown; Sonja M Reichert; Christopher N C Smith; Moira Stewart; Martin Fortin Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2020-04-06
Authors: Lisanne S Welink; Kaatje Van Roy; Roger A M J Damoiseaux; Hilde A Suijker; Peter Pype; Esther de Groot; Marie-Louise E L Bartelink Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Elizabeth Cottrell; Victoria Silverwood; Alex Strivens-Joyce; Lucy Minshull; John J Edwards; Sarah Lawton; Matt Aiello; Sharon Turner Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Lisanne S Welink; Tessa C van Charldorp; Laura Di Colandrea; Marie-Louise L Bartelink; Peter Pype; Roger A M J Damoiseaux; Esther de Groot Journal: Med Educ Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 7.647
Authors: Lisanne S Welink; Esther de Groot; Peter Pype; Kaatje Van Roy; Iris D van den Wittenboer; Marie-Louise E L Bartelink; Roger A M J Damoiseaux Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Robin Miller; Nynke Scherpbier; Loes van Amsterdam; Virgínia Guedes; Peter Pype Journal: Prim Health Care Res Dev Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 1.458
Authors: Janita Pak Chun Chau; Suzanne Hoi Shan Lo; Vivian Wing Yan Lee; Wai Ming Yiu; Helen Chung Yan Chiang; David R Thompson; Alexander Yuk Lun Lau Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 2.463