| Literature DB >> 29093572 |
Nils R Backeberg1, Francesco Iacoviello2, Martin Rittner3, Thomas M Mitchell3, Adrian P Jones3, Richard Day4, John Wheeler5, Paul R Shearing2, Pieter Vermeesch3, Alberto Striolo2.
Abstract
The permeability of shales is important, because it controls where oil and gas resources can migrate to and where in the Earth hydrocarbons are ultimately stored. Shales have a well-known anisotropic directional permeability that is inherited from the depositional layering of sedimentary laminations, where the highest permeability is measured parallel to laminations and the lowest permeability is perpendicular to laminations. We combine state of the art laboratory permeability experiments with high-resolution X-ray computed tomography and for the first time can quantify the three-dimensional interconnected pathways through a rock that define the anisotropic behaviour of shales. Experiments record a physical anisotropy in permeability of one to two orders of magnitude. Two- and three-dimensional analyses of micro- and nano-scale X-ray computed tomography illuminate the interconnected pathways through the porous/permeable phases in shales. The tortuosity factor quantifies the apparent decrease in diffusive transport resulting from convolutions of the flow paths through porous media and predicts that the directional anisotropy is fundamentally controlled by the bulk rock mineral geometry. Understanding the mineral-scale control on permeability will allow for better estimations of the extent of recoverable reserves in shale gas plays globally.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29093572 PMCID: PMC5665904 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14810-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
QEMSCAN mineralogy and rock physics results for sample suite.
| Shale sample | #1 | #2 | #3 | #4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borehole | A | A | B | B |
| Depth (m) | 3721 | 3731 | 3690 | 3703 |
| Density (g/cm3) | 2.41 | 2.52 | 2.52 | 2.60 |
| Clays | 62.2 | 61.3 | ||
| Quartz | 11.2 | 9.6 | ||
| Plagioclase | 2.9 | 3.6 | ||
| Dolomite | 2.9 | 9.6 | ||
| Calcite | 0.6 | 1.3 | ||
| Muscovite | 6.3 | 5.6 | ||
| Pyrite | 1.3 | 1.6 | ||
| Trace minerals | 11 | 4 | ||
| Porosity + OC | 1.5 | 3.4 | ||
|
| ||||
| Porosity (%) | 5.6 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 2.7 |
| Effective pressure (MPa) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| k | 3.2 × 10−22 | 3.5 × 10−22 | 2.5 × 10−22 | 4.0 × 10−22 |
| k | — | — | 1.9 × 10−22 | 2.8 × 10−22 |
| k | — | — | 1.6 × 10−21 | 6.3 × 10−20 |
| k | — | — | 9.1 × 10−22 | 2.0 × 10−20 |
QEMSCAN porosity results includes organic carbon (OC). Permeability reported for lamination-perpendicular (kv) and lamination-parallel (kh) flow.
Figure 1QEMSCAN chemical maps of sample 4 analysed at 10 micron spacing resolution scan of entire thin section (a) and 1 micron spacing detailed map (b). On the right half of each image we show only pore space distribution on white background. Lamination-parallel fractures visible at both scales. Mineral proportions are reported in Table 1.
Figure 2X-ray computed tomography data. (a–c) Zeiss Xradia 520 Versa micro X-ray computed tomography with voxel size of 0.8 microns. (a) Lamination-parallel view of sample. (b) Vertical section view through sample showing silty (7% porous phase) and clay-rich (13% porous phase) compositional laminations of approximately 0.5 mm thickness. (c) Segmentation of grayscale into 4 distinguishable phases. (d–f) Zeiss Xradia 810 Ultra nano X-ray computed tomography with voxel size of 0.126 microns. (d) Lamination-parallel view of sample. (e) Vertical section view through sample. (f) Porous volume rendering (dashed volume outline in (e)) of grayscale threshold segmentation representing 11 volume % (red).
Figure 3Experimental argon (red) and water (blue) permeability results through 20 mm diameter by 20 mm length shale cores. Permeability was measured perpendicular to laminations (triangles), parallel to laminations (squares) and along a lamination-parallel fracture (circles).
Argon gas permeability was measured by the pore pressure oscillation technique through an open fracture parallel to lamination of sample 4.
| Effective pressure (MPa) | 5 | 15 | 25 | 35 | 45 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| test 1 (m2) | 1.4 × 10−18 | 7.8 × 10−19 | |||
| test 2 (m2) | 1.9 × 10−18 | 6.3 × 10−19 | 2.5 × 10−19 | ||
| test 3 (m2) | 4.7 × 10−19 | 2.2 × 10−19 | 7.4 × 10−20 | 1.6 × 10−20 | |
| test 4 (m2) | 1.1 × 10−19 | 4.4 × 10−20 | 1.8 × 10−20 | 4.0 × 10−21 |
Measurements were taken continuously while the confining pressure was increased at 10 MPa increments from 10 MPa to 50 MPa. Pore pressure was set at 5 MPa with a 1 MPa oscillation amplitude at 1 hour wavelengths. The sample was left in the apparatus overnight at 5 MPa effective pressure between tests 1, 2 and 3. The sample was extracted from the apparatus after test 3 and reloaded for a 4th test.
Figure 4Two-dimensional fracture analyses using FracPaQ[58]. Clay-rich layer (a) and silt-rich layer (b) from sample 2 with X-ray CT image overlain with FracPaQ image analyses from binary porous phase image. Orientation rose diagram (c,d) and length versus angle (e) results for each layer (clay-rich layer = green; silt-rich layer = blue).
Figure 5TauFactor[48] three-dimensional tortuosity factor analyses. Detailed results are provided in the supplementary material (Table S1). (a) Section of binary volume (black = porous volume; white = non-porous volume) in a schematic of tortuosity factor analysis with constant base axes and increasing the unit length of the test axis at 10% proportions. (b) Plot of average tortuosity factors for nano- and micro-CT volumes. (c) Porous phase volume percent comparison from 3 to 20% using the nano-CT volume along the bedding-parallel axes. Red star at the end of 3 and 5% tests is the point at which the computation failed. (d–g) Stacked 3D image of modelled interconnected pathways through clay-rich layer at micro- and nano-scale.
Figure 6Permeability hierarchy of shale gas wells from well to clay minerals. (a) Well access (k1) to shale gas reservoir with stimulated hydro-fracture network. (b) Propped (k2) and unpropped (k3) fracture network connected to well with mm-scale pore distribution background from QEMSCAN results. (c) Inter-fracture lamination and mineral-scale fabric-controlled permeability (k4&5) with micron-scale pore distribution background from QEMSCAN results and mineral distribution scans from micro-CT results.