| Literature DB >> 25627247 |
Li Chen1, Lei Zhang2, Qinjun Kang3, Hari S Viswanathan3, Jun Yao2, Wenquan Tao4.
Abstract
Porous structures of shales are reconstructed using the markov chain monte carlo (MCMC) method based on scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of shale samples from Sichuan Basin, China. Characterization analysis of the reconstructed shales is performed, including porosity, pore size distribution, specific surface area and pore connectivity. The lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) is adopted to simulate fluid flow and Knudsen diffusion within the reconstructed shales. Simulation results reveal that the tortuosity of the shales is much higher than that commonly employed in the Bruggeman equation, and such high tortuosity leads to extremely low intrinsic permeability. Correction of the intrinsic permeability is performed based on the dusty gas model (DGM) by considering the contribution of Knudsen diffusion to the total flow flux, resulting in apparent permeability. The correction factor over a range of Knudsen number and pressure is estimated and compared with empirical correlations in the literature. For the wide pressure range investigated, the correction factor is always greater than 1, indicating Knudsen diffusion always plays a role on shale gas transport mechanisms in the reconstructed shales. Specifically, we found that most of the values of correction factor fall in the slip and transition regime, with no Darcy flow regime observed.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25627247 PMCID: PMC4308705 DOI: 10.1038/srep08089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Reconstruction of the shale matrix.
(a) A SEM image of a shale rock; (b)3D reconstructed porous structures of shales; (c) pore size distribution of the reconstructed shale; (d) the “transport” (blue) and “dead” (read) portions of void space in the reconstructed shale.
Figure 2Methane concentration distributions in the reconstructed shale.
Figure 3Distribution of pressure and streamline in the reconstructed shale.
Figure 4Correction factor between apparent permeability and intrinsic permeability predicted by LB simulations and empirical correlations for transport in a cylinder.
Figure 5Correction factor predicted by numerical simulations and empirical correlations under different pressure.
Figure 6Correction factor predicted by numerical simulations and empirical correlations under different Knudsen number.