| Literature DB >> 29093218 |
Sjoerd Duijns1,2, Lawrence J Niles3, Amanda Dey4, Yves Aubry5, Christian Friis6, Stephanie Koch7, Alexandra M Anderson8, Paul A Smith2.
Abstract
Body condition (i.e. relative mass after correcting for structural size) affects the behaviour of migrating birds, but how body condition affects migratory performance, timing and fitness is still largely unknown. Here, we studied the effects of relative body condition on individual departure decisions, wind selectivity, flight speed and timing of migration for a long-distance migratory shorebird, the red knot Calidris canutus rufa. By using automated VHF telemetry on a continental scale, we studied knots' migratory movements with unprecedented temporal resolution over a 3-year period. Knots with a higher relative body condition left the staging site later than birds in lower condition, yet still arrived earlier to their Arctic breeding grounds compared to knots in lower relative body condition. They accomplished this by selecting more favourable winds at departure, thereby flying faster and making shorter stops en route Individuals with a higher relative body condition in spring migrated south up to a month later than individuals in lower condition, suggesting that individuals in better condition were more likely to have bred successfully. Moreover, individuals with a lower relative body condition in spring had a lower probability of being detected in autumn, suggestive of increased mortality. The pressure to arrive early to the breeding grounds is considered to be an important constraint of migratory behaviour and this study highlights the important influence of body condition on migratory decisions, performance and potentially fitness of migrant birds.Entities:
Keywords: Calidris canutus rufa; automated telemetry; departure decision; migratory performance; shorebirds
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29093218 PMCID: PMC5698639 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1374
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Biol Sci ISSN: 0962-8452 Impact factor: 5.349
Figure 1.Estimates of the relationship between relative body condition at capture and the timing of departure from Delaware Bay. Individuals with higher relative body condition at capture departed later than individuals with a lower relative body condition. The open dots represent the individuals that were successfully detected entering the Arctic breeding grounds, and the closed dots represent all individuals for which accurate departure times were recorded. Relative body condition (i.e. relative mass after correcting for structural size) is estimated from a linear mixed effects model (see text), and the grey area represents 95% confidence interval for the predicted relationship.
Figure 2.Estimates of the relationship between (a) relative body condition and ground speed (km h−1), where individuals with a higher relative body condition have higher ground speeds. This appears to be primarily an effect of tailwind at departure, as (b) shows the positive relation between tailwind at departure and ground speed and (c) shows the relation between relative body condition and mean tailwind along the entire route. Relative body condition (i.e. relative mass after correcting for structural size) is estimated from a linear mixed model (see text), and the grey area represents the 95% confidence interval.
Figure 3.First autumn detection dates at the Bay of Fundy and the Mingan Archipelago in relation to relative body condition at capture during spring migration, for individuals that were successfully detected in both seasons. The positive correlation between relative body condition at capture in spring and the first autumn detection date could suggest that individuals with a high relative body condition at capture had a successful breeding attempt. The grey area represents 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 4.Probability of detection in autumn, and the number of individuals detected, in relation to the relative body condition at capture. The solid line represents the predicted values of the logistic regression in relation to relative body condition at capture. The horizontal bars represent the number of individuals that were not detected (0) and birds that were detected (1). Birds with higher relative body condition at capture in spring were more likely to be detected in autumn. (Online version in colour.)