Karen C Nanji1,2,3, Diane L Seger3,4, Sarah P Slight4,5,6, Mary G Amato4,7, Patrick E Beeler4, Qoua L Her4, Olivia Dalleur4,8, Tewodros Eguale4,7, Adrian Wong4,7, Elizabeth R Silvers3,4, Michael Swerdloff3,4, Salman T Hussain1, Nivethietha Maniam3,4, Julie M Fiskio4, Patricia C Dykes4, David W Bates2,3,4. 1. Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Partners HealthCare Systems, Wellesley, MA, USA. 4. The Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 5. School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. 6. Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK. 7. Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA. 8. Louvain Drug Research Institute and Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
Objective: To define the types and numbers of inpatient clinical decision support alerts, measure the frequency with which they are overridden, and describe providers' reasons for overriding them and the appropriateness of those reasons. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of medication-related clinical decision support alerts over a 3-year period at a 793-bed tertiary-care teaching institution. We measured the rate of alert overrides, the rate of overrides by alert type, the reasons cited for overrides, and the appropriateness of those reasons. Results: Overall, 73.3% of patient allergy, drug-drug interaction, and duplicate drug alerts were overridden, though the rate of overrides varied by alert type (P < .0001). About 60% of overrides were appropriate, and that proportion also varied by alert type (P < .0001). Few overrides of renal- (2.2%) or age-based (26.4%) medication substitutions were appropriate, while most duplicate drug (98%), patient allergy (96.5%), and formulary substitution (82.5%) alerts were appropriate. Discussion: Despite warnings of potential significant harm, certain categories of alert overrides were inappropriate >75% of the time. The vast majority of duplicate drug, patient allergy, and formulary substitution alerts were appropriate, suggesting that these categories of alerts might be good targets for refinement to reduce alert fatigue. Conclusion: Almost three-quarters of alerts were overridden, and 40% of the overrides were not appropriate. Future research should optimize alert types and frequencies to increase their clinical relevance, reducing alert fatigue so that important alerts are not inappropriately overridden.
Objective: To define the types and numbers of inpatient clinical decision support alerts, measure the frequency with which they are overridden, and describe providers' reasons for overriding them and the appropriateness of those reasons. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of medication-related clinical decision support alerts over a 3-year period at a 793-bed tertiary-care teaching institution. We measured the rate of alert overrides, the rate of overrides by alert type, the reasons cited for overrides, and the appropriateness of those reasons. Results: Overall, 73.3% of patientallergy, drug-drug interaction, and duplicate drug alerts were overridden, though the rate of overrides varied by alert type (P < .0001). About 60% of overrides were appropriate, and that proportion also varied by alert type (P < .0001). Few overrides of renal- (2.2%) or age-based (26.4%) medication substitutions were appropriate, while most duplicate drug (98%), patientallergy (96.5%), and formulary substitution (82.5%) alerts were appropriate. Discussion: Despite warnings of potential significant harm, certain categories of alert overrides were inappropriate >75% of the time. The vast majority of duplicate drug, patientallergy, and formulary substitution alerts were appropriate, suggesting that these categories of alerts might be good targets for refinement to reduce alert fatigue. Conclusion: Almost three-quarters of alerts were overridden, and 40% of the overrides were not appropriate. Future research should optimize alert types and frequencies to increase their clinical relevance, reducing alert fatigue so that important alerts are not inappropriately overridden.
Authors: Adrian Wong; Christine Rehr; Diane L Seger; Mary G Amato; Patrick E Beeler; Sarah P Slight; Adam Wright; David W Bates Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Mary Grace Fitzmaurice; Adrian Wong; Hannah Akerberg; Simona Avramovska; Pamela L Smithburger; Mitchell S Buckley; Sandra L Kane-Gill Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Saul Blecker; Jonathan S Austrian; Leora I Horwitz; Gilad Kuperman; Donna Shelley; Meg Ferrauiola; Stuart D Katz Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 4.046