Literature DB >> 29091999

Evaluation and comparison of methods for recapitulation of 3D spatial chromatin structures.

Jincheol Park, Shili Lin.   

Abstract

How chromosomes fold and how distal genomic elements interact with one another at a genomic scale have been actively pursued in the past decade following the seminal work describing the Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) assay. Essentially, 3C-based technologies produce two-dimensional (2D) contact maps that capture interactions between genomic fragments. Accordingly, a plethora of analytical methods have been proposed to take a 2D contact map as input to recapitulate the underlying whole genome three-dimensional (3D) structure of the chromatin. However, their performance in terms of several factors, including data resolution and ability to handle contact map features, have not been sufficiently evaluated. This task is taken up in this article, in which we consider several recent and/or well-regarded methods, both optimization-based and model-based, for their aptness of producing 3D structures using contact maps generated based on a population of cells. These methods are evaluated and compared using both simulated and real data. Several criteria have been used. For simulated data sets, the focus is on accurate recapitulation of the entire structure given the existence of the gold standard. For real data sets, comparison with distances measured by Florescence in situ Hybridization and consistency with several genomic features of known biological functions are examined.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  3D structure; contact maps; data resolution; dependency

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29091999      PMCID: PMC6781574          DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbx134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  20 in total

1.  Probabilistic modeling of Hi-C contact maps eliminates systematic biases to characterize global chromosomal architecture.

Authors:  Eitan Yaffe; Amos Tanay
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Capturing heterogeneity: single-cell structures of the 3D genome.

Authors:  Elzo de Wit
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 15.369

3.  Genome architectures revealed by tethered chromosome conformation capture and population-based modeling.

Authors:  Reza Kalhor; Harianto Tjong; Nimanthi Jayathilaka; Frank Alber; Lin Chen
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-12-25       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping.

Authors:  Suhas S P Rao; Miriam H Huntley; Neva C Durand; Elena K Stamenova; Ivan D Bochkov; James T Robinson; Adrian L Sanborn; Ido Machol; Arina D Omer; Eric S Lander; Erez Lieberman Aiden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome.

Authors:  Erez Lieberman-Aiden; Nynke L van Berkum; Louise Williams; Maxim Imakaev; Tobias Ragoczy; Agnes Telling; Ido Amit; Bryan R Lajoie; Peter J Sabo; Michael O Dorschner; Richard Sandstrom; Bradley Bernstein; M A Bender; Mark Groudine; Andreas Gnirke; John Stamatoyannopoulos; Leonid A Mirny; Eric S Lander; Job Dekker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Impact of data resolution on three-dimensional structure inference methods.

Authors:  Jincheol Park; Shili Lin
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  3D structures of individual mammalian genomes studied by single-cell Hi-C.

Authors:  Tim J Stevens; David Lando; Srinjan Basu; Liam P Atkinson; Yang Cao; Steven F Lee; Martin Leeb; Kai J Wohlfahrt; Wayne Boucher; Aoife O'Shaughnessy-Kirwan; Julie Cramard; Andre J Faure; Meryem Ralser; Enrique Blanco; Lluis Morey; Miriam Sansó; Matthieu G S Palayret; Ben Lehner; Luciano Di Croce; Anton Wutz; Brian Hendrich; Dave Klenerman; Ernest D Laue
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Bayesian inference of spatial organizations of chromosomes.

Authors:  Ming Hu; Ke Deng; Zhaohui Qin; Jesse Dixon; Siddarth Selvaraj; Jennifer Fang; Bing Ren; Jun S Liu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Statistical models for detecting differential chromatin interactions mediated by a protein.

Authors:  Liang Niu; Guoliang Li; Shili Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Multiplexed analysis of chromosome conformation at vastly improved sensitivity.

Authors:  James O J Davies; Jelena M Telenius; Simon J McGowan; Nigel A Roberts; Stephen Taylor; Douglas R Higgs; Jim R Hughes
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  1 in total

1.  HiCImpute: A Bayesian hierarchical model for identifying structural zeros and enhancing single cell Hi-C data.

Authors:  Qing Xie; Chenggong Han; Victor Jin; Shili Lin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.