Literature DB >> 29091960

High SLC4A11 expression is an independent predictor for poor overall survival in grade 3/4 serous ovarian cancer.

Lianzhi Qin1, Ting Li2, Yuhua Liu3.   

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to examine the expression of SLC4A11 in ovarian cancer and in normal ovarian tissues, its prognostic value and the possible mechanism of its dysregulation. Bioinformatic analysis was performed by using data from the GEO datasets, the Cancer Genome Atlas-Ovarian Cancer (TCGA-OV) and the Human Protein Atlas (HPA). Results showed that SLC4A11 was upregulated in ovarian cancer compared with normal ovarian epithelial tissues. In patients with primary serous ovarian cancer in TCGA-OV, the cases with lymphatic invasion (N = 133) had significantly higher SLC4A11 expression than those without lymphatic invasion (N = 77) (p = 0.0069). High SLC4A11 expression was consistently associated with worse overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate analysis confirmed that high SLC4A11 expression was an independent prognostic factor for poor OS in grade 3/4 (G3/G4) tumors (HR = 1.416, 95%CI: 1.098-1.824, p = 0.007). 320 out of 578 (55.4%) ovarian cancer cases had SLC4A11 amplification. High methylation group had a significantly lower level of SLC4A11 expression. Based on these findings, we infer that high SLC4A11 expression is an independent predictor for poor OS in grade 3/4 serous ovarian cancer. Both DNA amplification and hypomethylation contribute to its upregulation in ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29091960      PMCID: PMC5665559          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Intracellular and extracellular pH (pHi and pHe) homeostasis is an important constitution of cellular microenvironment and is a prerequisite for normal cell function [1]. Studies in the past decade revealed that pHi homeostasis is often dramatically altered in cancer [2, 3]. Cancer cells usually keep a pHi that is equal to or even more alkaline than the surrounding normal counterparts, suggesting that they upregulate net acid extrusion [2, 3]. This alteration leads to at least two fundamental differences to normal physiology: firstly, it is supportive to maintain pHi homeostasis by eliminating excessive production of acid equivalents in cancer cells due to hypoxia and/or oncogene-induced changes in glycolytic metabolism [4]; secondly, prolonged extracellular acidification (pHe), which favors tumor invasion and metastasis [5, 6]. Solute linked cotransporter 4 (SLC4) family is comprised of ten members (SLC4A1-5; SLC4A7-11), which have critical roles in pHi buffering [7, 8]. SLC4A1-3 are Cl−/HCO3− exchangers and function as cellular acid loaders [9]. SLC4A4, −4A5, −4A7, −4A8 and −4A10 are Na+-coupled HCO3− transporters and function as cellular acid extruders [9]. SLC4A11 is the most divergent member of this family and has recently been characterized as a Na+/OH− and NH4+ transporter [10]. Therefore, SLC4A11 can mediate H+ efflux and can be considered as a cellular acid extruder. Dysregulated SLC4 family members have been implied in pathological development of some cancers. For example, SLC4A7 regulates pHi and tumor cell progression in breast cancers [11, 12]. Upregulated SLC4A4 contributes to growth and migration of colon and breast cancer cells [13]. SLC4A9 disruption by either genetic or pharmaceutical approaches results in pHi acidification and reduced cell growth of breast cancer and glioma cells [14]. Ovarian cancer cells have an elevated H+ efflux compared with non-tumor cells [15]. One recent study found that the basal pHi is higher in ovarian cancer A2780 cells than in normal ovarian HOSE cells [16]. SLC9A1 amplification is a mechanism of the high basal PHi and is associated with unfavorable overall patient survival [16]. These findings suggest that pHi regulation is closely related to ovarian cancer cell behaviors and prognosis of the patients. In this study, we examined the expression of SLC4A11 in ovarian cancer/normal ovarian tissues and further assessed its prognostic value and the possible mechanism of its dysregulation.

Materials and methods

Bioinformatic data mining in GEO

The normalized data of one previous microarray (GDS3592) [17] that explored the dysregulated genes in ovarian cancer epithelial cells (CEPIs) from patients with primary serous ovarian cancer compared with normal ovarian surface epithelia (OSE) was downloaded from GEO dataset for secondary analysis.

Data mining in the Human Protein Atlas

SLC4A11 expression at the protein level in normal ovarian tissues and in serous ovarian cancer tissues was compared by using the immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining data provided by the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) (http://www.proteinatlas.org/) [18, 19].

Bioinformatic analysis using data from TCGA-Ovarian Cancer (TCGA-OV)

SLC4A11 expression, its copy number alteration and its DNA methylation in patients with ovarian cancer were examined using data from TCGA-OV. Original data downloaded from the UCSC Xena Browser (https://xenabrowser.net/) were given in S1 Table. The association between SLC4A11 expression and overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) was assessed by generating Kaplan-Meier survival curves, with median SLC4A11 expression as the cutoff. The analysis was performed using the UCSC Xena Browser or by using GraphPad Prism 6.0. Among 595 patients with primary serous ovarian cancer in TCGA-OV, 540 patients had SLC4A11 expression measured by AgilentG4502A_07_3. This proportion of patients was included in the univariate and multivariate analysis of the association between SLC4A11 expression and OS/RFS.

Statistical analysis

The association between clinicopathological characteristics and SLC4A11 expression was assessed by using χ2 tests. The significance of the difference between the survival curves was assessed by log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate prognostic significance. Welch’s t-test was conducted to compare SLC4A11 expression between patients with or without lymphatic invasion and between groups with high/low methylation. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

SLC4A11 is upregulated in ovarian cancer compared with normal ovarian epithelial tissues

By re-analysis of the normalized data of GDS3592, we examined the expression of SLC4A family members in CEPIs and OSE (Fig 1A). SLC4A11 was the most significantly upregulated gene among the 10 SLC4A family members (Fig 1A, red arrow). The bar chart of the array signaling value further indicated that SLC4A11 was significantly upregulated in the CEPI samples compared with the OSE samples (Fig 1B). By data mining in the HPA, we found that in normal ovarian tissues, follicle cells had medium SLC4A11 staining (Fig 1C). But SLC4A11 expression was not detectable in ovarian stroma cells (Fig 1C). In comparison, the serous ovarian cancer tissues usually had low to medium SLC4A11 staining in both cytoplasma and cell membrane (Fig 1D).
Fig 1

SLC4A11 is upregulated in ovarian cancer compared with normal ovarian epithelial tissues.

A. Heat map of the expression of SLC4A family members in 12 cases of ovarian CEPIs compared with 12 cases of OSE. Red: up-regulation; Blue: down-regulation. The image was generated by re-analysis of the raw microarray data of GDS3592. B. SLC4A11 microarray signal values in 12 CEPIs and 12 OSE cases. Data were analyzed by using the tool provided by GEO datasets. C-D. Representative images of IHC staining of SLC4A11 in normal ovarian tissues (C) and serous ovarian cancer tissues (D). Data were obtained from the HPA: http://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000088836-SLC4A11/pathology/tissue/ovarian+cancer.

SLC4A11 is upregulated in ovarian cancer compared with normal ovarian epithelial tissues.

A. Heat map of the expression of SLC4A family members in 12 cases of ovarian CEPIs compared with 12 cases of OSE. Red: up-regulation; Blue: down-regulation. The image was generated by re-analysis of the raw microarray data of GDS3592. B. SLC4A11 microarray signal values in 12 CEPIs and 12 OSE cases. Data were analyzed by using the tool provided by GEO datasets. C-D. Representative images of IHC staining of SLC4A11 in normal ovarian tissues (C) and serous ovarian cancer tissues (D). Data were obtained from the HPA: http://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000088836-SLC4A11/pathology/tissue/ovarian+cancer.

High SLC4A11 expression is associated with lymphatic invasion

Using data from TCGA-OV, we compared SLC4A11 expression in ovarian cancer patients with or without lymphatic invasion. Results revealed that the cases with lymphatic invasion (N = 133) had significantly higher SLC4A11 expression (p = 0.0069) than those without lymphatic invasion (N = 77) (Fig 2A and 2B).
Fig 2

High SLC4A11 expression is associated with lymphatic invasion.

A-B. Heat map (A) and box plots (B) of SLC4A11 expression in patients with or without lymphatic invasion.

High SLC4A11 expression is associated with lymphatic invasion.

A-B. Heat map (A) and box plots (B) of SLC4A11 expression in patients with or without lymphatic invasion.

High SLC4A11 expression is an independent predictor of poor OS in ovarian cancer patients

The association between clinicopathological features and SLC4A11 expression in patients with primary serous ovarian cancer was summarized in Table 1. High SLC4A11 expression was significantly associated with lower grade tumors (GB/G1/G2) (p = 0.038), and a larger proportion of lymphatic invasion (p = 0.027) and deceased cases (p = 0.036) (Table 1). In addition, the high SLC4A11 expression group also had a higher ratio of tumor residual disease at the margin level of significance (p = 0.050) (Table 1). However, no significant difference was observed in recurrence rate between the two groups (Table 1). Then, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed between the high and low SLC4A11 expression groups in TCGA-OV. In the database, SLC4A11 expression was quantified by RNAseq (AgilentG4502A_07_3 and IlluminaHiSeq respectively) and exon RNAseq (polyA+ IlluminaHiSeq). Among 540 patients with SLC4A11 measured by AgilentG4502A_07_3, 534 patients had OS data. Both IlluminaHiSeq and RNAseq data included 302 patients with OS data (Fig 2A–2C). Log-rank test showed that in all measurements, high SLC4A11 expression was consistently associated with worse OS compared with low SLC4A11 expression (p = 0.00025, 0.0051 and 0.014 respectively, Fig 2A–2C). Recent studies suggest that GB/G1/G2 carcinoma belong to type I, while G3/G4 carcinomas belong to type II tumors, which have significant clinicopathologic and molecular differences [20, 21]. We then performed subgroup analysis in GB/G1/G2 and G3/G4 tumors respectively. In both groups, we found that high SLC4A11 expression was associated with unfavorable OS (Fig 3D and 3E). In univariate analysis, high SLC4A11 expression was associated with poor prognosis in terms of OS in both GB/G1/G2 and G3/G4 tumors (p = 0.011 and p<0.001 respectively) (Table 2). However, following multivariate analysis only confirmed the independent prognostic value of high SLC4A11 expression in G3/G4 tumors (HR = 1.416, 95%CI: 1.098–1.824, p = 0.007; Table 2), but not in GB/G1/G2 tumors (HR = 1.832, 95%CI: 0.987–3.402, p = 0.055; Table 2). Due to insufficient data of recurrence, we only assessed the association between SLC4A11 expression and RFS in patients with G3/G4 diseases. No independent prognostic value of SLC4A11 expression was observed in terms of RFS (Table 2).
Table 1

Demographic and clinicopathological parameters of patients with primary ovarian cancer in TCGA-OV.

ParametersSLC4A11 expression RNAseqχ2p Value
High (N = 270)Low (N = 270)
Age (Mean ± SD)≥601311220.540.46
<60139147
Null01
GradeGB/G1/G246304.300.038
G3/G4215236
GX + Null94
Clinical stageI/II18240.930.33
III/IV249243
Null33
Venous invasionNo30372.050.15
Yes4837
Null192196
Lymphatic invasionNo33444.880.027
Yes7855
Null159171
Tumor residual diseaseNo44623.830.050
Yes194177
Null3231
Recurrence statusNo5100.240.62
Yes2131
Null244229
Living StatusLiving991224.380.036
Dead169144
Null24

GB: Border line malignancy; G1: Well differentiated; G2: Moderately differentiated; G3-G4: Poorly differentiated or Undifferentiated; GX: Grade cannot be assessed. Null: no data.

Fig 3

High SLC4A11 expression is associated with poor survivals in ovarian cancer patients.

A-E. Kaplan-Meier curves of OS in ovarian cancer patients with high and low SLC4A11 expression. Data were obtained from TCGA-OV. SLC4A11 expression was quantified by RNAseq (AgilentG4502A_07_3 (A) and IlluminaHiSeq respectively (B)) and exon RNAseq (polyA+ IlluminaHiSeq) (C). Kaplan-Meier curves of OS in GB/G1/G2 patients (D) and in G3/G4 patients (E).

Table 2

Univariate and multivariate analyses of OS/RFS in patients with primary ovarian cancer in TCGA-OV.

ParametersUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
pHR95%CI (lower/upper)pHR95%CI (lower/upper)
OS (GB/G1/G2)Age ≥60 vs.< 600.0112.1711.1923.9560.9991.000.5491.824
Clinical stageIII/IV vs. I/II0.0185.5571.33823.070.03674.631.09919.504
Venous invasionNo vs. Yes0.1120.3920.1231.244
Lymphatic invasionNo vs. Yes0.9991.0010.273.712
Tumor residual diseaseNo vs. Yes0.2081.6930.7463.841
SLC4A11 expressionHigh vs. Low0.0112.1711.1923.9560.0551.8320.9873.402
OS (G3/G4)Age ≥60 vs.< 60<0.0011.6161.2662.0620.0011.5161.1871.937
Clinical stageIII/IV vs. I/II0.1231.7430.8613.529
Venous invasionNo vs. Yes0.5331.20.6762.132
Lymphatic invasionNo vs. Yes0.0550.6130.3731.010.5630.8590.5141.437
Tumor residual diseaseNo vs. Yes<0.0012.461.6473.675<0.0012.2521.4973.39
SLC4A11 expressionHigh vs. Low<0.0011.5951.2472.040.0071.4161.0981.824
RFS (G3/G4)Age ≥60 vs.< 600.30041.3660.7572.465
Clinical stageIII/IV vs. I/II0.1460.220.0291.692
Tumor residual diseaseNo vs. Yes0.0172.4211.1754.9890.0412.1671.0314.553
SLC4A11 expressionHigh vs. Low0.0521.7690.9963.140.1791.5110.8282.757

GB: Border line malignancy; G1: Well differentiated; G2: Moderately differentiated; G3-G4: Poorly differentiated or Undifferentiated. OS: overall survival; RFS: recurrence-free survival.

GB: Border line malignancy; G1: Well differentiated; G2: Moderately differentiated; G3-G4: Poorly differentiated or Undifferentiated; GX: Grade cannot be assessed. Null: no data. GB: Border line malignancy; G1: Well differentiated; G2: Moderately differentiated; G3-G4: Poorly differentiated or Undifferentiated. OS: overall survival; RFS: recurrence-free survival.

High SLC4A11 expression is associated with poor survivals in ovarian cancer patients.

A-E. Kaplan-Meier curves of OS in ovarian cancer patients with high and low SLC4A11 expression. Data were obtained from TCGA-OV. SLC4A11 expression was quantified by RNAseq (AgilentG4502A_07_3 (A) and IlluminaHiSeq respectively (B)) and exon RNAseq (polyA+ IlluminaHiSeq) (C). Kaplan-Meier curves of OS in GB/G1/G2 patients (D) and in G3/G4 patients (E).

SLC4A11 expression is regulated by DNA amplification and methylation in ovarian cancer

Via analyzing the deep sequencing data in TCGA-OV, we further explored the mechanisms of SLC4A11 dysregulation. Among 578 patients with copy number measured, 320 (55.4%) cases had DNA amplification (Fig 4A). By comparing SLC4A11 expression and its DNA methylation status, we also confirmed that the high methylation group had a significantly lower level of SLC4A11 expression (Fig 4B–4D).
Fig 4

SLC4A11 expression is regulated by DNA amplification and methylation in ovarian cancer.

A. Heat map of SLC4A11 copy number changes in TCGA-OV. -1: deletion; 0: no change; 1: amplification; 2: high-amplification. B-D. Heat map (B) and box plots (C-D) of SLC4A11 expression and DNA methylation in TCGA-OV. Patients were divided into high and low methylation groups according to the median value of the two probes (cg11004890 and cg08284598) respectively.

SLC4A11 expression is regulated by DNA amplification and methylation in ovarian cancer.

A. Heat map of SLC4A11 copy number changes in TCGA-OV. -1: deletion; 0: no change; 1: amplification; 2: high-amplification. B-D. Heat map (B) and box plots (C-D) of SLC4A11 expression and DNA methylation in TCGA-OV. Patients were divided into high and low methylation groups according to the median value of the two probes (cg11004890 and cg08284598) respectively.

Discussion

As a Na+-coupled base transporter capable of Na+-H+ exchange in mammalian cells, SLC4A11 mutation is associated with a series of corneal endothelial diseases characterized by dysfunction of the endothelial cells in the inner surface of the cornea [22-24]. These diseases finally result in the apoptosis of corneal endothelial cells, and subsequent edema and impaired vision [25]. In fact, the normal corneal endothelial function is dependent on the balanced regulation of bicarbonate concertation and pHi/pHe. Based on these findings, we infer that the putative bicarbonate transport or Na+-H+ exchange activity of SLC4A11 is essential for maintaining normal cellular physiological functions. In this study, we found that SLC4A11 expression is significantly upregulated in ovarian cancer tissues than in normal tissues. The alkaline intracellular environment of cancer cells is usually associated with the upregulation of the expression and/or activity of acid extruders or downregulation of the expression and/or activity of acid loading transporters [1]. Given the pHi regulatory activity demonstrated in previous studies [10, 26], SLC4A11 naturally owns a strong cellular buffering capacity that enables the highly glycolytic cancer cells to remove lactic acid rapidly. Its upregulation can be considered as an adaptive response of the cancer cells to metabolic changes. In addition, upregulation of the acid extruders leads to extracellular acidification, thereby generating a favorable environment for tumor invasion and metastasis [5, 6]. In this study, we observed that the patients with metastasis had significantly higher SLC4A11 expression than their counterparts without metastasis. Therefore, we infer that SLC4A11 upregulation is an important mechanism leading to malignant cellular behaviors in ovarian cancer. By comparing the clinicopathological features between high and low SLC4A11 expression groups, we found that the high SLC4A11 expression group had a significantly higher ratio of lymphatic invasion and deceased cases. However, we also observed that the high SLC4A11 expression group had a substantially larger proportion of low-grade tumors (GB/G1/G2) (46/261, 17.6% vs. 30/261, 11.3%) compared with the low SLC4A11 group. Actually, G1/G2 serous ovarian carcinomas belong to type I tumors, while G3/G4 serous ovarian carcinomas belong to type II tumors, which have different molecular and biological profiles [20, 21]. We hypothesized that the difference in tumor grade might be related to the genetic difference between type I and type II tumors. However, more studies are required to confirm this hypothesis. Currently, a series of predictors such as clinical stage, CA125 levels, age, response to chemotherapy and residual disease after debulking surgery are used to predict prognosis of ovarian cancer patients. However, there is still some discrepancy in the prognosis of similar tumors characterized by these clinical variables [27]. Ovarian cancers actually are a heterogeneous group of neoplasias derived from the ovarian surface epithelium, inclusion cysts, or the fallopian tube [28, 29]. The differences at the molecular level may be important sources of the variations. Therefore, it is necessary to explore other molecular parameters for better prediction of prognosis. In this study, based on the survival data of patients in TCGA-OV, we found that high SLC4A11 expression was robustly associated with poor OS. Following univariate and multivariate analysis confirmed that high SLC4A11 expression was an independent prognostic factor for poor OS in G3/G4 tumors. These findings suggest that SLC4A11 might be a potential clinical marker in this group of patients. Although the association between SLC4A11 expression and OS in GB/G1/G2 patients was not significant, it showed a trend toward significance (p = 0.055). Considering the small number of GB/G1/G2 patients included in this study (N = 76), it is meaningful to further explore its prognostic value with a large sample base in the future. SLC4A11 locates in chromosome 20p in the human genome, a region with a relatively high frequency of genetic amplification in ovarian cancer [30, 31]. By using deep sequencing data in TCGA-OV, we found that 320 out of 578 ovarian cancer cases had SLC4A11 amplification. Therefore, DNA amplification is one important mechanism of upregulated SLC4A11 in ovarian cancer. Epigenetic regulation, such as methylation and histone modification are also important mechanisms of dysregulated genes in ovarian cancer [32, 33]. Thus, we also investigated whether methylation status influences SLC4A11 expression. By using the results from Illumina 27k methylation array, we found that the group with high DNA methylation had significantly lower SLC4A11 expression, suggesting that epigenetic alterations also contribute to SLC4A11 upregulation in ovarian cancer.

Conclusion

Based on findings above, we infer that high SLC4A11 expression is an independent predictor for poor OS in grade 3/4 serous ovarian cancer. Both DNA amplification and hypomethylation contribute to its upregulation in ovarian cancer.

Original data downloaded from the UCSC Xena Browser.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  33 in total

Review 1.  Morphological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma: a review with emphasis on new developments and pathogenesis.

Authors:  W Glenn McCluggage
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.306

2.  Mutations in sodium-borate cotransporter SLC4A11 cause recessive congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED2).

Authors:  Eranga N Vithana; Patricio Morgan; Periasamy Sundaresan; Neil D Ebenezer; Donald T H Tan; Moin D Mohamed; Seema Anand; Khin O Khine; Divya Venkataraman; Victor H K Yong; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Anandalakshmi Venkatraman; Ke Guo; Boomiraj Hemadevi; Muthiah Srinivasan; Venkatesh Prajna; Myint Khine; Joseph R Casey; Chris F Inglehearn; Tin Aung
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-06-11       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  The Na(+)/HCO3(-) Co-Transporter SLC4A4 Plays a Role in Growth and Migration of Colon and Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Scott K Parks; Jacques Pouyssegur
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  SLC4A11 is an EIPA-sensitive Na(+) permeable pHi regulator.

Authors:  Diego G Ogando; Supriya S Jalimarada; Wenlin Zhang; Eranga N Vithana; Joseph A Bonanno
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.249

Review 5.  Disrupting proton dynamics and energy metabolism for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Scott K Parks; Johanna Chiche; Jacques Pouysségur
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Improvement in the prognosis of ovarian cancer in the era before addition of molecular targeting therapy.

Authors:  Takako Shimada; Toshiaki Saito; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Kumi Shimamoto; Shuhei Matsushita; Shinichiro Yamaguchi; Kazuya Ariyoshi; Masao Okadome
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  A subcellular map of the human proteome.

Authors:  Peter J Thul; Lovisa Åkesson; Mikaela Wiking; Diana Mahdessian; Aikaterini Geladaki; Hammou Ait Blal; Tove Alm; Anna Asplund; Lars Björk; Lisa M Breckels; Anna Bäckström; Frida Danielsson; Linn Fagerberg; Jenny Fall; Laurent Gatto; Christian Gnann; Sophia Hober; Martin Hjelmare; Fredric Johansson; Sunjae Lee; Cecilia Lindskog; Jan Mulder; Claire M Mulvey; Peter Nilsson; Per Oksvold; Johan Rockberg; Rutger Schutten; Jochen M Schwenk; Åsa Sivertsson; Evelina Sjöstedt; Marie Skogs; Charlotte Stadler; Devin P Sullivan; Hanna Tegel; Casper Winsnes; Cheng Zhang; Martin Zwahlen; Adil Mardinoglu; Fredrik Pontén; Kalle von Feilitzen; Kathryn S Lilley; Mathias Uhlén; Emma Lundberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Epigenetic regulation of cancer-associated genes in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Mi Jeong Kwon; Young Kee Shin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Disrupting Hypoxia-Induced Bicarbonate Transport Acidifies Tumor Cells and Suppresses Tumor Growth.

Authors:  Alan McIntyre; Alzbeta Hulikova; Ioanna Ledaki; Cameron Snell; Dean Singleton; Graham Steers; Peter Seden; Dylan Jones; Esther Bridges; Simon Wigfield; Ji-Liang Li; Angela Russell; Pawel Swietach; Adrian L Harris
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Differential expression of the Slc4 bicarbonate transporter family in murine corneal endothelium and cell culture.

Authors:  William Shei; Jun Liu; Hla M Htoon; Tin Aung; Eranga N Vithana
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 2.367

View more
  7 in total

1.  Emergence of a High-Plasticity Cell State during Lung Cancer Evolution.

Authors:  Nemanja Despot Marjanovic; Matan Hofree; Jason E Chan; David Canner; Katherine Wu; Marianna Trakala; Griffin G Hartmann; Olivia C Smith; Jonathan Y Kim; Kelly Victoria Evans; Anna Hudson; Orr Ashenberg; Caroline B M Porter; Alborz Bejnood; Ayshwarya Subramanian; Kenneth Pitter; Yan Yan; Toni Delorey; Devan R Phillips; Nisargbhai Shah; Ojasvi Chaudhary; Alexander Tsankov; Travis Hollmann; Natasha Rekhtman; Pierre P Massion; John T Poirier; Linas Mazutis; Ruifang Li; Joo-Hyeon Lee; Angelika Amon; Charles M Rudin; Tyler Jacks; Aviv Regev; Tuomas Tammela
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 31.743

2.  Ammonia sensitive SLC4A11 mitochondrial uncoupling reduces glutamine induced oxidative stress.

Authors:  Diego G Ogando; Moonjung Choi; Rajalekshmy Shyam; Shimin Li; Joseph A Bonanno
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2019-06-23       Impact factor: 11.799

3.  Identification of MEG8/miR-378d/SOBP axis as a novel regulatory network and associated with immune infiltrates in ovarian carcinoma by integrated bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Jian Lei; Zhen-Yu He; Jun Wang; Min Hu; Ping Zhou; Chen-Lu Lian; Li Hua; San-Gang Wu; Juan Zhou
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Clinical significance of metabolism-related genes and FAK activity in ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Masakazu Sato; Sho Sato; Daisuke Shintani; Mieko Hanaoka; Aiko Ogasawara; Maiko Miwa; Akira Yabuno; Akira Kurosaki; Hiroyuki Yoshida; Keiichi Fujiwara; Kosei Hasegawa
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 5.  Insights into the Role of Oxidative Stress in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Dan-Ni Ding; Liang-Zhen Xie; Ying Shen; Jia Li; Ying Guo; Yang Fu; Fang-Yuan Liu; Feng-Juan Han
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 6.543

6.  In Silico Study to Predict the Structural and Functional Consequences of SNPs on Biomarkers of Ovarian Cancer (OC) and BPA Exposure-Associated OC.

Authors:  Aeman Zahra; Marcia Hall; Jayanta Chatterjee; Cristina Sisu; Emmanouil Karteris
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  The H+ Transporter SLC4A11: Roles in Metabolism, Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Uncoupling.

Authors:  Joseph A Bonanno; Raji Shyam; Moonjung Choi; Diego G Ogando
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 6.600

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.