Literature DB >> 29090485

Fisher information and Cramér-Rao lower bound for experimental design in parallel imaging.

Mustapha Bouhrara1, Richard G Spencer1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) is widely used in the design of magnetic resonance (MR) experiments for parameter estimation. Previous work has considered only Gaussian or Rician noise distributions in this calculation. However, the noise distribution for multi-coil acquisitions, such as in parallel imaging, obeys the noncentral χ-distribution under many circumstances. The purpose of this paper is to present the CRLB calculation for parameter estimation from multi-coil acquisitions. THEORY AND METHODS: We perform explicit calculations of Fisher matrix elements and the associated CRLB for noise distributions following the noncentral χ-distribution. The special case of diffusion kurtosis is examined as an important example. For comparison with analytic results, Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were conducted to evaluate experimental minimum standard deviations (SDs) in the estimation of diffusion kurtosis model parameters. Results were obtained for a range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), and for both the conventional case of Gaussian noise distribution and noncentral χ-distribution with different numbers of coils, m.
RESULTS: At low-to-moderate SNR, the noncentral χ-distribution deviates substantially from the Gaussian distribution. Our results indicate that this departure is more pronounced for larger values of m. As expected, the minimum SDs (i.e., CRLB) in derived diffusion kurtosis model parameters assuming a noncentral χ-distribution provided a closer match to the MC simulations as compared to the Gaussian results.
CONCLUSION: Estimates of minimum variance for parameter estimation and experimental design provided by the CRLB must account for the noncentral χ-distribution of noise in multi-coil acquisitions, especially in the low-to-moderate SNR regime. Magn Reson Med 79:3249-3255, 2018.
© 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cramér-Rao lower bound; Fisher information; experimental design; noncentral χ-distribution; parallel imaging; parameter estimation; quantitative MRI

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29090485      PMCID: PMC5843523          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  37 in total

Review 1.  Cramér-Rao bounds: an evaluation tool for quantitation.

Authors:  S Cavassila; S Deval; C Huegen; D van Ormondt; D Graveron-Demilly
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 2.  Encoding and reconstruction in parallel MRI.

Authors:  Klaas P Pruessmann
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  A general framework for experiment design in diffusion MRI and its application in measuring direct tissue-microstructure features.

Authors:  Daniel C Alexander
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Assessment of different fitting methods for in-vivo bi-component T2* analysis of human patellar tendon in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Richard Kijowski
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2017-05-10

5.  Comprehensive analysis of the Cramer-Rao bounds for magnetic resonance temperature change measurement in fat-water voxels using multi-echo imaging.

Authors:  Cory Wyatt; Brian J Soher; Kavitha Arunachalam; James MacFall
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 6.  Parallel MR imaging.

Authors:  Anagha Deshmane; Vikas Gulani; Mark A Griswold; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Optimization of diffusion measurements using Cramer-Rao lower bound theory and its application to articular cartilage.

Authors:  Oscar Brihuega-Moreno; Frank P Heese; Laurance D Hall
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  The Limitations of Model-Based Experimental Design and Parameter Estimation in Sloppy Systems.

Authors:  Andrew White; Malachi Tolman; Howard D Thames; Hubert Rodney Withers; Kathy A Mason; Mark K Transtrum
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Generalized min-max bound-based MRI pulse sequence design framework for wide-range T1 relaxometry: A case study on the tissue specific imaging sequence.

Authors:  Yang Liu; John R Buck; Vasiliki N Ikonomidou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Universally sloppy parameter sensitivities in systems biology models.

Authors:  Ryan N Gutenkunst; Joshua J Waterfall; Fergal P Casey; Kevin S Brown; Christopher R Myers; James P Sethna
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  7 in total

1.  Spatially adaptive unsupervised multispectral nonlocal filtering for improved cerebral blood flow mapping using arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mustapha Bouhrara; Diana Y Lee; Abinand C Rejimon; Christopher M Bergeron; Richard G Spencer
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Four-angle method for practical ultra-high-resolution magnetic resonance mapping of brain longitudinal relaxation time and apparent proton density.

Authors:  Mustapha Bouhrara; Abinand C Rejimon; Luis E Cortina; Nikkita Khattar; Richard G Spencer
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Optimization of spin-lock times in T mapping of knee cartilage: Cramér-Rao bounds versus matched sampling-fitting.

Authors:  Marcelo V W Zibetti; Azadeh Sharafi; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Cerebral aggregate g-ratio mapping using magnetic resonance relaxometry and diffusion tensor imaging to investigate sex and age-related differences in white matter microstructure.

Authors:  Luis E Cortina; Richard W Kim; Matthew Kiely; Curtis Triebswetter; Zhaoyuan Gong; Maryam H Alsameen; Mustapha Bouhrara
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Supporting measurements or more averages? How to quantify cerebral blood flow most reliably in 5 minutes by arterial spin labeling.

Authors:  Piet Bladt; Matthias J P van Osch; Patricia Clement; Eric Achten; Jan Sijbers; Arnold J den Dekker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  The costs and benefits of estimating T1 of tissue alongside cerebral blood flow and arterial transit time in pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling.

Authors:  Piet Bladt; Arnold J den Dekker; Patricia Clement; Eric Achten; Jan Sijbers
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-11-17       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Fast data-driven learning of parallel MRI sampling patterns for large scale problems.

Authors:  Marcelo V W Zibetti; Gabor T Herman; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.