| Literature DB >> 29090281 |
Arumugam Dhanesh Gandhi1, Dhandapani Kayal Vizhi1, Kubendiran Lavanya1, V N Kalpana2, V Devi Rajeswari2, Ranganathan Babujanarthanam1.
Abstract
The main objective of this research is to investigate the anti-biofilm and anti-bacterial activity of Sesbania grandiflora (S. grandiflora) against Staphylococcus aureus. S. grandiflora extract were prepared and analyzed with UV -Vis spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Dynamic light scattering. Biofilm forming pathogens were identified by congo-red assay. Quantification of Extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) particularly protein and carbohydrate were calculated. The efficacy of the herbal extract S. grandiflora and its inhibition against the pathogenic strain of S. aureus was also evaluated. The gradual decrease or disappearance of peaks reveals the reduction of protein and carbohydrate content in the EPS of S. aureus when treated with S. grandiflora. The antibacterial activity of S. grandiflora extract against the bacterial strain S. aureus showed that the extract were more active against the strain. To conclude, anti-biofilm and antibacterial efficacy of S. grandiflora plays a vital role over biofilm producing pathogens and act as a good source for controlling the microbial population.Entities:
Keywords: Congo-red assay; Extra polymorphic substances (EPS); FTIR; Sesbania grandiflora; Staphylococcus aureus
Year: 2017 PMID: 29090281 PMCID: PMC5655386 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.10.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochem Biophys Rep ISSN: 2405-5808
Fig. 1Sesbania grandiflora.
Fig. 2Aqueous extract of Sesbania grandiflora.
Fig. 3Congo red assay.
Fig. 4UV-Visible spectrum of EPS.
Fig. 5FTIR spectrum of EPS.
Fig. 6Dynamic light scattering of EPS.
Zeta potential peaks and its determination.
| −12.3 mV | |
| −11.2 mV | |
| −7.5 mV | |
| −7.3 mV |
Fig. 7Histogram of emulsification index.
Fig. 8Carbohydrate estimation in EPS.
Comparison of carbohydrate concentration with control.
| Concentration of | Carbohydrate concentration present in control and treated EPS (µg) | Percentage of Carbohydrate inhibition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| – | 51 | – | |
| 250 | 45 | 11.2% | |
| 500 | 30 | 36.71% | |
| 750 | 22 | 49.36% |
Fig. 9Estimation of Protein in EPS.
Comparison of protein concentration with control.
| – | 44 | – | |
| 250 | 41 | 2.1% | |
| 500 | 37 | 6.5% | |
| 750 | 31 | 14.44% |