Literature DB >> 29090070

Alternative Splicing Generates Different 5' UTRs in OCT4B Variants.

Ensieh M Poursani1, Majid Mehravar1, Alireza Shahryari1, Seyed Javad Mowla1, Bahram Mohammad Soltani1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The human OCT4 gene, responsible for pluripotency and self-renewal of Embryonic Stem (ES) and Embryonic Carcinoma (EC) cells, can generate several transcripts (OCT4A, OCT4B-variant 2, OCT4B-variant 3, OCT4B-variant 5, OCT4B1, OCT4 B2 and OCT4B3) by alternative splicing and alternative promoters. OCT4A that is responsible for ES and EC cell stemness properties is transcribed from a promoter upstream of Exon1a in those cells. The OCT4B group variants (OCT4B-variant2, OCT4B-variant3, OCT4B-variant5, OCT4B1, OCT4B2 and OCT4B3) are transcribed from a different promoter located in intron 1 and some of them respond to the cell stresses, but cannot sustain the ES/EC cell self-renewal. However, the exact function of OCT4B group variants is still unclear.
METHODS: In the present study, we employed RT-PCR and sequencing approaches to explore different forms of OCT4 transcripts.
RESULTS: Our data revealed that the OCT4B group variants (OCT4B-variant2, OCT4 B-variant3, OCT4B1, OCT4B2 and OCT4B3) have longer 5' UTR in the human bladder carcinoma cell line of 5637.
CONCLUSION: These OCT4 variants undergo alternative splicing in their 5' UTR which might exert regulatory roles in transcription and translation mechanisms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5′ untranslated regions; Alternative splicing; Genes

Year:  2017        PMID: 29090070      PMCID: PMC5650738     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avicenna J Med Biotechnol        ISSN: 2008-2835


Introduction

The OCT4, an important transcription factor responsible for stemness, is a main regulator of pluripotency and self-renewal retaining in the Embryonic Stem (ES) and Embryonic Carcinoma (EC) cells [1-3]. This gene encodes for two types of variants; OCT4A and OCT4B group variants (OCT4B-variant 2, OCT4B-variant 3, OCT4B-variant 5, OCT4B1, OCT4B2 and OCT4B3) [4]. OCT4A is known to induce stemness properties in ES and EC cells and in contrast, OCT4B variants cannot sustain self-renewal and pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Some studies showed that OCT4B variants (OCT4B-190 and OCT4B-265 isoforms) are up-regulated during cell stresses [5],[6]. OCT4B1 is highly expressed in undifferentiated cells and down-regulate during cell differentiation [7]. OCT4B group variants are produced by alternative promoter and alternative splicing events in various human cancer cell lines. Since these OCT4 variants seem to be important in cancer cells and also, most of them generate the same protein isoforms, it was decided to evaluate 5′-UTR sequences of known OCT4B group variants in bladder cancer cell line of 5637 that expresses most of OCT4 transcripts. The 5′ Untranslated Region (5′ UTR) is located upstream of the start codon (AUG), and plays crucial roles in regulating transcription and translation of related mRNAs [8]. The whole or partial sequence of 5′ UTR, which is called uORF (upstream Open Reading Frame), can be translated into single or several short peptides that can regulate translation of the main coding sequence of the same mRNA. Also, the existence of unique regulatory elements in 5′ UTR might influence the protein translation by providing binding sites for regulatory factors [9]. In this study, the length and structure of the 5′ UTRs of OCT4B group variants were investigated by in silico analysis and experimental approaches such as RT-PCR and sequencing in the human bladder cancer cell line of 5637.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture, RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

5637 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2. Then, 5637 cells were harvested and the RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent according to the instruction of manufacturer. Quality and quantity of extracted RNA was evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometry, respectively. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using 2 μg RNA with reverse transcriptase enzyme, according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Fermentase).

Reverse Transcription (RT)-Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

RT-PCR was performed by F/R primer set using amplicon Taq DNA polymerase. The primer sequences were as follows: F; 5′-AGGGCTCTTTGTCCACTTTGTATAG-3, R; 5′-CTCAAAGCGGCAGATGGTCG-3′; GAPF (5′-GC CACATCGCTCAGACAC-3′) and GAPR (5′-GGCAA CAATATCCACTTTACCAG-3′). PCR program was carried out at 94°C for 4 min, amplification for 35 cycles with denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 65°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The thermal profile for GAPDH was performed for 28 cycles with annealing at 58°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 15 s.

DNA cloning and sequencing

PCR products were excited from agarose gel, purified by DNA purification kit (GeneAll Biotechnology, South Korea) and cloned into the pTZ57R/T vector. Positive colonies containing recombinant vectors were selected by colony PCR. Recombinant vectors were extracted by plasmid extraction kit (GeneAll Biotechnology, South Korea) and sequenced (Applied Biosystems, South Korea).

Results

B group variants of OCT4 have longer 5′ UTRs

RT-PCR assay was performed using a new forward primer located upstream of 5′ UTR of the OCT4B group variants and PCR products were cloned into PTZ57R/T vector and sequenced. The sequencing results were blasted in NCBI database against the human genome and transcriptome and it was indicated that OCT4B group variants have a longer 5′-UTR with different sequences. Based on our sequencing data, the OCT4B group 5′ UTRs were 88-bp longer than those which have been registered in NCBI databank (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Reverse Transcription (RT)-Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). RT-PCR was performed using primer set F/R for 5637 cells. The predicted PCR product sizes were 1420, 1195, 790/796 and 550-bp corresponded for OCT4B1, OCT4B-variant2, OCT4B-variant3/OCT4B2 and OCT4B3, respectively. Ladder is DNA marker 100-bp, and no-RT sample was used as a control to confirm absence of DNA contaminations.

Reverse Transcription (RT)-Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). RT-PCR was performed using primer set F/R for 5637 cells. The predicted PCR product sizes were 1420, 1195, 790/796 and 550-bp corresponded for OCT4B1, OCT4B-variant2, OCT4B-variant3/OCT4B2 and OCT4B3, respectively. Ladder is DNA marker 100-bp, and no-RT sample was used as a control to confirm absence of DNA contaminations.

Alternative splicing generates different 5′ UTRs in OCT4B group variants

Alignment of sequencing data with online tools such as NCBI BLAST, GeneBee multiple alignment and CLUSTALW showed that the 5′ UTR of the OCT4B group transcripts undergo alternative splicing in various OCT4 variants. OCT4B1 had a complete 5′ UTR, but OCT4B, OCT4B2 and OCT4B3 lost some parts of their 5′ UTR by splicing (Figure 2). However, alternative splicing in 5′ UTR sequences of OCT4B group variants does not affect amino acid sequence of their proteins; it might influence the transcription and translation efficiencies (Figure 3).
Figure 2.

A schematic structure of OCT4 variants. OCT4A is composed of 5 exons which exon 1a is specific for this variant. Other OCT4B group variants have exon 1b instead of exon 1a and have longer 5′ UTR. Also, this figure indicates occurring alternative splicing in 5′ UTR of OCT4B group variants, specifically in exon 1b. It should be mentioned that OCT4B-variant 2 and OCT4B-variant 5 are different just in one SNP that cause generating longer isoform in OCT4B-variant 5.

Figure 3.

Protein isoforms produced by OCT4 transcripts. OCT4B transcript can produce two isoforms that initiate from ATG start codon (OCT4B-265 and OCT4B-164) and one isoform initiates from CTG start codon (OCT4B-190). OCT4B1, OCT4B2 and OCT4B3 can potentially translate to a 164 amino acid protein that is the same with OCT4B-164 isoform

A schematic structure of OCT4 variants. OCT4A is composed of 5 exons which exon 1a is specific for this variant. Other OCT4B group variants have exon 1b instead of exon 1a and have longer 5′ UTR. Also, this figure indicates occurring alternative splicing in 5′ UTR of OCT4B group variants, specifically in exon 1b. It should be mentioned that OCT4B-variant 2 and OCT4B-variant 5 are different just in one SNP that cause generating longer isoform in OCT4B-variant 5. Protein isoforms produced by OCT4 transcripts. OCT4B transcript can produce two isoforms that initiate from ATG start codon (OCT4B-265 and OCT4B-164) and one isoform initiates from CTG start codon (OCT4B-190). OCT4B1, OCT4B2 and OCT4B3 can potentially translate to a 164 amino acid protein that is the same with OCT4B-164 isoform

In silico analysis of OCT4 5′UTR sequences

Based on uORF theory within 5′-UTR of mRNAs which translate to small peptides and can regulate eukaryotic gene expression), deleted sequences of OCT4 5′UTRs were translated using expasy translate tool. Our in silico analysis revealed that deleted region of 5′UTRs in the OCT4-variant3, OCT4B2 and OCT4B3 can produce 6, 6 and 4 peptides potentially. The peptides resulted from OCT4-variant 3 5′-UTR have 5, 9, 11, 14, 15 and 30 residues length. Also, OCT4B2 5′-UTR can potentially be translated into peptides with 5, 7, 8, 9, 45 and 49 residues. Moreover, OCT4B3 5′-UTR can potentially be translated into 3 peptides with 5, 15 and 30 residues.

Discussion

OCT4 is a crucial and dependent determinant of pluripotency in ES and EC cells [10]. The regulatory role of OCT4 in pluripotency and self-renewal in ES and EC cells introduced this gene as a pluripotency marker [11]. This gene has two potential promoters that generate OCT4A and OCT4B group variants (OCT4B-variant2, OCT4B-variant3, OCT4B-variant5, OCT4B1, OCT4 B2 and OCT4B3) [12]. OCT4A expression is normally attributed to pluripotent cells such as primordial germ cells (PGCs), ES and EC cells [10],[13]. The OCT4B group variants are expressed in different cancer cells, differentiated cells and undifferentiated cell types. While some studies proposed the role of these variants in response to the cell stresses, little information exists about the exact expression, function and structure of these variants [1],[5]. When investigating on the new variants of OCT4 gene, it was revealed that OCT4B group variants have longer 5′ UTR and their 5′ UTRs have different sequences due to alternative splicing (GenBank accession numbers: KF880691 for OCT4B-variant3, KF880692 for OCT4B1, KJ700311 for OCT4B2, KJ624996 for OCT4B3 and KX151172 for OCT4-variant 2). Longer and various 5′ UTR, respectively provides more and different regulatory elements that might influence the efficiency of transcription, translation and even function of protein products of a single gene. In most of past studies, 3′ UTRs were considered as important targets for gene regulation. For example, microRNAs could target 3′ UTR sequences of various genes and down-regulate gene expression via translation inhibition. Some microRNAs such as miR-145 and miR-302a can inhibit OCT4 translation and regulate OCT4 gene expression during development, respectively [14],[15]. However, there is no comprehensive study for the importance of 5′ UTR sequence on the OCT4 gene expression during transcription and translation mechanisms. All over, alternative splicing in 5′UTR sequence and using various 5′UTR for several products of the same gene can play regulatory roles for translation efficiencies under different conditions, also in various tissues, during different stages of development and even in various cancers and diseases. It is supposed that OCT4B group protein levels might be regulated by using different 5′ UTR sequences in OCT4B group variants during various human cancers and diseases.

Conclusion

Therefore, it is hoped that further studies such as cloning of various 5′-UTR sequences in upstream, a reporter gene and evaluating the translation rate of that reporter gene will help to better understand the diversity in 5′UTR and its effect on the translation efficiency and function of each variant.
  15 in total

1.  The novel function of OCT4B isoform-265 in genotoxic stress.

Authors:  Yuan Gao; Jianshu Wei; Jin Han; Xia Wang; Guannan Su; Yannan Zhao; Bing Chen; Zhifeng Xiao; Jiani Cao; Jianwu Dai
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.277

2.  Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Laurie A Boyer; Tong Ihn Lee; Megan F Cole; Sarah E Johnstone; Stuart S Levine; Jacob P Zucker; Matthew G Guenther; Roshan M Kumar; Heather L Murray; Richard G Jenner; David K Gifford; Douglas A Melton; Rudolf Jaenisch; Richard A Young
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Alternative translation of OCT4 by an internal ribosome entry site and its novel function in stress response.

Authors:  Xia Wang; Yannan Zhao; Zhifeng Xiao; Bing Chen; Zhanliang Wei; Bin Wang; Jing Zhang; Jin Han; Yuan Gao; Lingsong Li; Hongxi Zhao; Wenxue Zhao; Hang Lin; Jianwu Dai
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.277

4.  Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic fibroblasts by Oct4 and Klf4 with small-molecule compounds.

Authors:  Yan Shi; Caroline Desponts; Jeong Tae Do; Heung Sik Hahm; Hans R Schöler; Sheng Ding
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  OCT4 spliced variants are differentially expressed in human pluripotent and nonpluripotent cells.

Authors:  Yaser Atlasi; Seyed J Mowla; Seyed A M Ziaee; Paul J Gokhale; Peter W Andrews
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 6.277

6.  POU5F1 isoforms show different expression patterns in human embryonic stem cells and preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Greet Cauffman; Inge Liebaers; André Van Steirteghem; Hilde Van de Velde
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 6.277

7.  New type of POU domain in germ line-specific protein Oct-4.

Authors:  H R Schöler; S Ruppert; N Suzuki; K Chowdhury; P Gruss
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-03-29       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Concise review: isoforms of OCT4 contribute to the confusing diversity in stem cell biology.

Authors:  Xia Wang; Jianwu Dai
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.277

9.  Translational regulation of angiotensin type 1a receptor expression and signaling by upstream AUGs in the 5' leader sequence.

Authors:  Hong Ji; Yinghua Zhang; Wei Zheng; Zheng Wu; Sunghou Lee; Kathryn Sandberg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Translational repression of mouse mu opioid receptor expression via leaky scanning.

Authors:  Kyu Young Song; Cheol Kyu Hwang; Chun Sung Kim; Hack Sun Choi; Ping-Yee Law; Li-Na Wei; Horace H Loh
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  5 in total

1.  Endogenous Retroelement-Driven Expression of OCT4B mRNA Variants.

Authors:  Spyros I Papamichos
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.739

2.  Influence of conception and delivery mode on stress response marker Oct4B1 and imprinted gene expression related to embryo development: A cohort study.

Authors:  Maria Argyraki; Socrates Katafigiotis; Theofanis Vavilis; Zoe Papadopoulou; Giorgos Tzimagiorgis; Anna-Bettina Haidich; Katerina Chatzimeletiou; Grigoris Grimbizis; Basil Tarlatzis; Maria Syrrou; Alexandros Lambropoulos
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2021-03-21

Review 3.  An Overview on the Complexity of OCT4: at the Level of DNA, RNA and Protein.

Authors:  Majid Mehravar; Fatemeh Ghaemimanesh; Ensieh M Poursani
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 6.692

4.  Systematic expression alteration analysis of master reprogramming factor OCT4 and its three pseudogenes in human cancer and their prognostic outcomes.

Authors:  Subbroto Kumar Saha; Yeojin Jeong; Sungha Cho; Ssang-Goo Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of the Vacuolar H+-ATPase Subunit H Gene Family in Crop Plants.

Authors:  Chen Kang; Fengjie Sun; Lei Yan; Rui Li; Jianrong Bai; Gustavo Caetano-Anollés
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.