Alison Keogh1, James Matthews2, Ricardo Segurado3, Deirdre A Hurley2. 1. UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. 2. UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin. 3. CSTAR and UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin.
Abstract
Background: Provider training programs are frequently underevaluated, leading to ambiguity surrounding effective intervention components. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a training program in guiding physical therapists to deliver the Self-management of Osteoarthritis and Low back pain through Activity and Skills (SOLAS) group education and exercise intervention (ISRCTN49875385), using a communication style underpinned by self-determination theory (SDT). Design: This was an assessment of the intervention arm training program using quantitative methods. Methods:Thirteen physical therapists were trained using mixed methods to deliver the SOLAS intervention. Training was evaluated using the Kirkpatrick model: (1) Reaction-physical therapists' satisfaction with training, (2) Learning-therapists' confidence in and knowledge of the SDT-based communication strategies and intervention content and their skills in applying the strategies during training, and (3) Behavior-8 therapists were audio-recorded delivering all 6 SOLAS intervention classes (n = 48), and 2 raters independently coded 50% of recordings (n = 24) using the Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ), the Controlling Coach Behavior Scale (CCBS), and an intervention-specific measure. Results:Reaction: Physical therapists reacted well to training (median [IRQ]; min-max = 4.7; [0.5]; 3.7-5.0). Learning: Physical therapists' confidence in the SDT-based communication strategies and knowledge of some intervention content components significantly improved. Behavior: Therapists delivered the intervention in a needs-supportive manner (median HCCQ = 5.3 [1.4]; 3.9-6.0; median CCBS = 6.6 ([0.5]; 6.1-6.8; median intervention specific measure = 4.0 [1.2]; 3.2-4.9). However, "goal setting" was delivered below acceptable levels by all therapists (median 2.9 [0.9]; 2.0-4.0). Limitations: The intervention group only was assessed as part of the process evaluation of the feasibility trial. Conclusions: Training effectively guided physical therapists to be needs-supportive during delivery of the SOLAS intervention. Refinements were outlined to improve future similar training programs, including greater emphasis on goal setting.
RCT Entities:
Background: Provider training programs are frequently underevaluated, leading to ambiguity surrounding effective intervention components. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a training program in guiding physical therapists to deliver the Self-management of Osteoarthritis and Low back pain through Activity and Skills (SOLAS) group education and exercise intervention (ISRCTN49875385), using a communication style underpinned by self-determination theory (SDT). Design: This was an assessment of the intervention arm training program using quantitative methods. Methods: Thirteen physical therapists were trained using mixed methods to deliver the SOLAS intervention. Training was evaluated using the Kirkpatrick model: (1) Reaction-physical therapists' satisfaction with training, (2) Learning-therapists' confidence in and knowledge of the SDT-based communication strategies and intervention content and their skills in applying the strategies during training, and (3) Behavior-8 therapists were audio-recorded delivering all 6 SOLAS intervention classes (n = 48), and 2 raters independently coded 50% of recordings (n = 24) using the Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ), the Controlling Coach Behavior Scale (CCBS), and an intervention-specific measure. Results: Reaction: Physical therapists reacted well to training (median [IRQ]; min-max = 4.7; [0.5]; 3.7-5.0). Learning: Physical therapists' confidence in the SDT-based communication strategies and knowledge of some intervention content components significantly improved. Behavior: Therapists delivered the intervention in a needs-supportive manner (median HCCQ = 5.3 [1.4]; 3.9-6.0; median CCBS = 6.6 ([0.5]; 6.1-6.8; median intervention specific measure = 4.0 [1.2]; 3.2-4.9). However, "goal setting" was delivered below acceptable levels by all therapists (median 2.9 [0.9]; 2.0-4.0). Limitations: The intervention group only was assessed as part of the process evaluation of the feasibility trial. Conclusions: Training effectively guided physical therapists to be needs-supportive during delivery of the SOLAS intervention. Refinements were outlined to improve future similar training programs, including greater emphasis on goal setting.
Authors: Per Kjaer; Alice Kongsted; Inge Ris; Allan Abbott; Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen; Ewa M Roos; Søren T Skou; Tonny Elmose Andersen; Jan Hartvigsen Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Deirdre A Hurley; James Matthews; Alison Keogh; Danielle Mc Ardle; Amanda M Hall; Helen Richmond; Suzanne Guerin; Tara Magdalinski Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 5.428