J Tarp1, A Bugge1, L B Andersen2,3, L B Sardinha4, U Ekelund3,5, S Brage5, N C Møller1. 1. Research Unit for Exercise Epidemiology, Centre of Research in Childhood Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. 2. Department of Teacher Education and Sport, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Sogndal, Norway. 3. Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway. 4. Exercise and Health Laboratory, CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz-Quebrada, Portugal. 5. Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: To model the association between accumulating 60 daily minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and a composite score of biological risk factors into a direct and an indirect effect, using abdominal obesity as the mediator. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: Cross-sectional data from the International Children's Accelerometry Database (ICAD) including 6-18-year-old children and adolescents (N=3412) from 4 countries providing at least 3 days of accelerometry-assessed physical activity. A standardized composite risk score was calculated from systolic blood pressure and fasting blood samples of insulin, glucose, triacylglycerol and inverse HDL-cholesterol. Abdominal obesity was assessed by the waist-circumference:height ratio. Two-stage regression analysis, allowing for exposure-mediator interaction, was used for the effect decomposition. RESULTS: Participants achieving 60 daily minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity had a 0.31 (95% CI: -0.39, -0.23) standard deviations lower composite risk score than those achieving less than 60 min. Modelling the associations suggested that 0.24 standard deviations (95% CI: -0.32, -0.16) was attributed to the direct effect and -0.07 (95% CI: -0.11, -0.02) to the indirect effect indicating that 22% of the total effect was mediated by central adiposity. Modelling 30 and 90 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day resulted in changes in the direct but not the indirect effect. CONCLUSIONS: One hour of daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was associated with clinically relevant differences in metabolic control compared to engagement in less than this minimally recommended amount. The majority of the difference was explained by the direct effect of physical activity.International Journal of Obesity advance online publication, 31 October 2017; doi:10.1038/ijo.2017.241.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: To model the association between accumulating 60 daily minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and a composite score of biological risk factors into a direct and an indirect effect, using abdominal obesity as the mediator. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: Cross-sectional data from the International Children's Accelerometry Database (ICAD) including 6-18-year-old children and adolescents (N=3412) from 4 countries providing at least 3 days of accelerometry-assessed physical activity. A standardized composite risk score was calculated from systolic blood pressure and fasting blood samples of insulin, glucose, triacylglycerol and inverse HDL-cholesterol. Abdominal obesity was assessed by the waist-circumference:height ratio. Two-stage regression analysis, allowing for exposure-mediator interaction, was used for the effect decomposition. RESULTS: Participants achieving 60 daily minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity had a 0.31 (95% CI: -0.39, -0.23) standard deviations lower composite risk score than those achieving less than 60 min. Modelling the associations suggested that 0.24 standard deviations (95% CI: -0.32, -0.16) was attributed to the direct effect and -0.07 (95% CI: -0.11, -0.02) to the indirect effect indicating that 22% of the total effect was mediated by central adiposity. Modelling 30 and 90 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day resulted in changes in the direct but not the indirect effect. CONCLUSIONS: One hour of daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was associated with clinically relevant differences in metabolic control compared to engagement in less than this minimally recommended amount. The majority of the difference was explained by the direct effect of physical activity.International Journal of Obesity advance online publication, 31 October 2017; doi:10.1038/ijo.2017.241.
Authors: Costan G Magnussen; Juha Koskinen; Wei Chen; Russell Thomson; Michael D Schmidt; Sathanur R Srinivasan; Mika Kivimäki; Noora Mattsson; Mika Kähönen; Tomi Laitinen; Leena Taittonen; Tapani Rönnemaa; Jorma S A Viikari; Gerald S Berenson; Markus Juonala; Olli T Raitakari Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-10-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Hannah Arem; Steven C Moore; Alpa Patel; Patricia Hartge; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Kala Visvanathan; Peter T Campbell; Michal Freedman; Elisabete Weiderpass; Hans Olov Adami; Martha S Linet; I-Min Lee; Charles E Matthews Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Rebecca C Richmond; George Davey Smith; Andy R Ness; Marcel den Hoed; George McMahon; Nicholas J Timpson Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2014-03-18 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Fernando Rodrigues Peixoto Quaresma; Erika da Silva Maciel; Francisco Winter Dos Santos Figueiredo; Fernando Adami Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2019-07-20 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Catherine Gammon; Andrew J Atkin; Kirsten Corder; Ulf Ekelund; Bjørge Herman Hansen; Lauren B Sherar; Lars Bo Andersen; Sigmund Anderssen; Rachel Davey; Pedro C Hallal; Russell Jago; Susi Kriemler; Peter Lund Kristensen; Soyang Kwon; Kate Northstone; Russell Pate; J O Salmon; Luis B Sardinha; Esther M F VAN Sluijs Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2022-02-21