| Literature DB >> 29086907 |
Sanjiv Kumar1, Siong Meng Lim2,3, Kalavathy Ramasamy2,3, Mani Vasudevan4, Syed Adnan Ali Shah2,5, Balasubramanian Narasimhan6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the past few yeEntities:
Keywords: Anticancer; Antimicrobial; Bis-pyrimidines; Claisen–Schmidt condensation; SAR
Year: 2017 PMID: 29086907 PMCID: PMC5548699 DOI: 10.1186/s13065-017-0312-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Cent J ISSN: 1752-153X Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1Some marketed drugs contains pyrimidine moiety
Fig. 2Biological profile of pyrimidine acetamide derivatives found in the resent literature
Scheme 1Synthesis of N, N′-(6,6′-(1,4-phenylene)bis(4-(4-nitrophenyl)pyrimidine-6,2-diyl)) bis(2-chloroacetamide) analogues
Antimicrobial and anticancer screening results of synthesized compounds
| Compounds No. | Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC = µmol/mL) | IC50 (µmol/mL) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial species | Fungal species | |||||||
| Gram positive | Gram negative | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HCT-116 | |
| 1. | 0.72 | 0.36 | 1.45 | 0.72 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 3.86 |
| 2. | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 1.45 | 0.72 | 1.45 | 3.86 |
| 3. | 1.31 | 0.33 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 1.31 | 0.66 | 1.31 | 3.50 |
| 4. | 0.75 | 0.19 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.50 | 0.75 | 1.50 | 4.00 |
| 5. | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 1.56 | 1.56 | 0.78 | 1.56 | 4.16 |
| 6. | 0.74 | 0.37 | 0.74 | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.48 | 3.96 |
| 7. | 0.67 | 0.67 | 1.34 | 0.67 | 1.34 | 1.34 | 1.34 | 3.58 |
| 8. | 0.72 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 0.72 | 1.45 | 0.72 | 1.45 | 3.86 |
| 9. | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 1.48 | 1.48 | 0.74 | 1.48 | 1.98 |
| 10. | 0.74 | 0.19 | 0.74 | 1.48 | 1.48 | 0.74 | 1.48 | 3.96 |
| 11. | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 1.55 | 1.52 |
| 12. | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 1.55 | 0.77 | 1.55 | 0.74 |
| 13. | 0.17 | 0.34 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 1.34 | 0.67 | 1.34 | 3.58 |
| 14. | 1.51 | 0.75 | 0.38 | 1.51 | 1.51 | 0.75 | 1.51 | 4.02 |
| 15. | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.51 | 2.17 |
| 16. | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.34 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 1.34 | 0.98 |
| 17. | 0.17 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.69 | 1.37 | 0.69 | 1.37 | 1.22 |
| 18. | 0.34 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 1.37 | 0.34 | 1.37 | 0.73 |
| 19. | 0.75 | 0.38 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.50 | 0.75 | 1.50 | 4.00 |
| 20. | 0.19 | 0.38 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.50 | 0.75 | 1.50 | 2.16 |
| DMSO | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | – |
| Cefadroxil | 1.72 | 0.86 | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.72 | – | – | – |
| Fluconazole | – | – | – | – | – | 1.02 | 2.04 | – |
| 5-Fluorouracil | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 7.67 |
Std. drugs: cefadroxil—Antibacterial; fluconazole—Antifungal; 5-fluorouracil—Anticancer
Fig. 3Antibacterial screening results against Gram positive species
Fig. 4Antibacterial screening results against Gram negative species
Fig. 5Antifungal screening results against fungal species
Fig. 6Anticancer screening results of the synthesized compounds
Fig. 7Structure activity relationship of bis-pyrimidine acetamides