Kwangdon Kim1, Kisung Lee2, Hakjae Lee3, Sungkwan Joo4, Jungwon Kang5. 1. Department of IT-Convergence, Korea University, Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, South Korea. 2. Department of Bio-Convergence Engineering, Korea University, Hana B, Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, South Korea. kisung@korea.ac.kr. 3. Department of Bio-Convergence Engineering and Medical Imaging Device Company, ARARE Lab., Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, South Korea. 4. School of Electrical Engineering, Korea University, Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, South Korea. 5. Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Dankook University, 152, Jukjeon-ro, Suji-gu, Yongin-Si, Gyeonggi-do, 16890, South Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to develop a gap-filling algorithm, in particular the filter mask design method of the algorithm, which optimizes the filter to the imaging object by an adaptive and iterative process, rather than by manual means. METHODS: Two numerical phantoms (Shepp-Logan and Jaszczak) were used for sinogram generation. The algorithm works iteratively, not only on the gap-filling iteration but also on the mask generation, to identify the object-dedicated low frequency area in the DCT-domain that is to be preserved. We redefine the low frequency preserving region of the filter mask at every gap-filling iteration, and the region verges on the property of the original image in the DCT domain. RESULTS: The previous DCT2 mask for each phantom case had been manually well optimized, and the results show little difference from the reference image and sinogram. We observed little or no difference between the results of the manually optimized DCT2 algorithm and those of the proposed algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithm works well for various types of scanning object and shows results that compare to those of the manually optimized DCT2 algorithm without perfect or full information of the imaging object.
PURPOSE: We aimed to develop a gap-filling algorithm, in particular the filter mask design method of the algorithm, which optimizes the filter to the imaging object by an adaptive and iterative process, rather than by manual means. METHODS: Two numerical phantoms (Shepp-Logan and Jaszczak) were used for sinogram generation. The algorithm works iteratively, not only on the gap-filling iteration but also on the mask generation, to identify the object-dedicated low frequency area in the DCT-domain that is to be preserved. We redefine the low frequency preserving region of the filter mask at every gap-filling iteration, and the region verges on the property of the original image in the DCT domain. RESULTS: The previous DCT2 mask for each phantom case had been manually well optimized, and the results show little difference from the reference image and sinogram. We observed little or no difference between the results of the manually optimized DCT2 algorithm and those of the proposed algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithm works well for various types of scanning object and shows results that compare to those of the manually optimized DCT2 algorithm without perfect or full information of the imaging object.
Entities:
Keywords:
DCT; DCT2; Gap filling; Positron emission tomography; Sinogram interpolation
Authors: S Jan; G Santin; D Strul; S Staelens; K Assié; D Autret; S Avner; R Barbier; M Bardiès; P M Bloomfield; D Brasse; V Breton; P Bruyndonckx; I Buvat; A F Chatziioannou; Y Choi; Y H Chung; C Comtat; D Donnarieix; L Ferrer; S J Glick; C J Groiselle; D Guez; P F Honore; S Kerhoas-Cavata; A S Kirov; V Kohli; M Koole; M Krieguer; D J van der Laan; F Lamare; G Largeron; C Lartizien; D Lazaro; M C Maas; L Maigne; F Mayet; F Melot; C Merheb; E Pennacchio; J Perez; U Pietrzyk; F R Rannou; M Rey; D R Schaart; C R Schmidtlein; L Simon; T Y Song; J M Vieira; D Visvikis; R Van de Walle; E Wieërs; C Morel Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Hannah M Linden; Svetlana A Stekhova; Jeanne M Link; Julie R Gralow; Robert B Livingston; Georgiana K Ellis; Philip H Petra; Lanell M Peterson; Erin K Schubert; Lisa K Dunnwald; Kenneth A Krohn; David A Mankoff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-08 Impact factor: 44.544