Matthew S Holden1, Chang Nancy Wang2, Kyle MacNeil3, Ben Church3, Lawrence Hookey2, Gabor Fichtinger3, Tamas Ungi3. 1. Laboratory for Percutaneous Surgery, School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. 72mh@queensu.ca. 2. Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. 3. Laboratory for Percutaneous Surgery, School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Manipulation of the colonoscope is a technical challenge for novice clinicians which is best learned in a simulated environment. It involves the coordination of scope tip steering with scope insertion, using a rotated image as reference. The purpose of this work is to develop and validate a system which objectively assesses colonoscopy technical skills proficiency in an arbitrary training environment, allowing novices to assess their technical proficiency prior to real patient encounters. METHODS: We implemented a motion tracking setup to objectively analyze and assess the way operators perform colonoscopies, including an analysis of wrist and elbow joint motions. Subsequently, we conducted a validation study to verify whether our motion analysis could discriminate novice colonoscopists from experts. Participants navigated a wooden bench-top model using a standard colonoscope while their motions were tracked. RESULTS: The developed motion tracking setup allowed colonoscopists of varying levels of proficiency to have their colonoscope manipulation assessed, and was able to be operated by a trained non-technical operator. Novice operators had significantly greater median times (101.5 vs. 31.5 s) and number of hand movements (62.0 vs. 21.5) than experts. Experts, however, spent a significantly greater proportion of time in extreme ranges of wrist and elbow joint motion than novices. CONCLUSION: We have developed and implemented a hand and joint motion analysis system that is able to discriminate novices from experts based on objective measures of motion. These metrics could, thus, serve as proxies for technical proficiency during training.
OBJECTIVE: Manipulation of the colonoscope is a technical challenge for novice clinicians which is best learned in a simulated environment. It involves the coordination of scope tip steering with scope insertion, using a rotated image as reference. The purpose of this work is to develop and validate a system which objectively assesses colonoscopy technical skills proficiency in an arbitrary training environment, allowing novices to assess their technical proficiency prior to real patient encounters. METHODS: We implemented a motion tracking setup to objectively analyze and assess the way operators perform colonoscopies, including an analysis of wrist and elbow joint motions. Subsequently, we conducted a validation study to verify whether our motion analysis could discriminate novice colonoscopists from experts. Participants navigated a wooden bench-top model using a standard colonoscope while their motions were tracked. RESULTS: The developed motion tracking setup allowed colonoscopists of varying levels of proficiency to have their colonoscope manipulation assessed, and was able to be operated by a trained non-technical operator. Novice operators had significantly greater median times (101.5 vs. 31.5 s) and number of hand movements (62.0 vs. 21.5) than experts. Experts, however, spent a significantly greater proportion of time in extreme ranges of wrist and elbow joint motion than novices. CONCLUSION: We have developed and implemented a hand and joint motion analysis system that is able to discriminate novices from experts based on objective measures of motion. These metrics could, thus, serve as proxies for technical proficiency during training.
Entities:
Keywords:
Colonoscopy; Medical education; Objective skill assessment; Simulation-based training
Authors: James Ansell; John Mason; Neil Warren; Peter Donnelly; Neil Hawkes; Sunil Dolwani; Jared Torkington Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Robert E Sedlack; Walter J Coyle; Keith L Obstein; Mohammad A Al-Haddad; Gennadiy Bakis; Jennifer A Christie; Raquel E Davila; Barry DeGregorio; Christoper J DiMaio; Brintha K Enestvedt; Jennifer Jorgensen; Daniel K Mullady; Liz Rajan Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Catharine M Walsh; Simon C Ling; Nitin Khanna; Samir C Grover; Jeffrey J Yu; Mary Anne Cooper; Elaine Yong; Geoffrey C Nguyen; Gary May; Thomas D Walters; Richard Reznick; Linda Rabeneck; Heather Carnahan Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2015-03-07 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Lars Konge; Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen; Louise Preisler; Lars Bo Svendsen; Yoon Soo Park Journal: Scand J Gastroenterol Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 2.423
Authors: Arjun D Koch; Sonja N Buzink; Jeroen Heemskerk; Sanne M B I Botden; Roeland Veenendaal; Jack J Jakimowicz; Erik J Schoon Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2007-05-22 Impact factor: 4.584