Literature DB >> 29086234

Objective assessment of colonoscope manipulation skills in colonoscopy training.

Matthew S Holden1, Chang Nancy Wang2, Kyle MacNeil3, Ben Church3, Lawrence Hookey2, Gabor Fichtinger3, Tamas Ungi3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Manipulation of the colonoscope is a technical challenge for novice clinicians which is best learned in a simulated environment. It involves the coordination of scope tip steering with scope insertion, using a rotated image as reference. The purpose of this work is to develop and validate a system which objectively assesses colonoscopy technical skills proficiency in an arbitrary training environment, allowing novices to assess their technical proficiency prior to real patient encounters.
METHODS: We implemented a motion tracking setup to objectively analyze and assess the way operators perform colonoscopies, including an analysis of wrist and elbow joint motions. Subsequently, we conducted a validation study to verify whether our motion analysis could discriminate novice colonoscopists from experts. Participants navigated a wooden bench-top model using a standard colonoscope while their motions were tracked.
RESULTS: The developed motion tracking setup allowed colonoscopists of varying levels of proficiency to have their colonoscope manipulation assessed, and was able to be operated by a trained non-technical operator. Novice operators had significantly greater median times (101.5 vs. 31.5 s) and number of hand movements (62.0 vs. 21.5) than experts. Experts, however, spent a significantly greater proportion of time in extreme ranges of wrist and elbow joint motion than novices.
CONCLUSION: We have developed and implemented a hand and joint motion analysis system that is able to discriminate novices from experts based on objective measures of motion. These metrics could, thus, serve as proxies for technical proficiency during training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Medical education; Objective skill assessment; Simulation-based training

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29086234     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-017-1676-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  31 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of validity testing in colonoscopy simulation.

Authors:  James Ansell; John Mason; Neil Warren; Peter Donnelly; Neil Hawkes; Sunil Dolwani; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Endoscopic simulator curriculum improves colonoscopy performance in novice surgical interns as demonstrated in a swine model.

Authors:  Dana A Telem; David W Rattner; Denise W Gee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Simulated Colonoscopy Objective Performance Evaluation (SCOPE): a non-computer-based tool for assessment of endoscopic skills.

Authors:  E M Ritter; T C Cox; K D Trinca; J P Pearl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  ASGE's assessment of competency in endoscopy evaluation tools for colonoscopy and EGD.

Authors:  Robert E Sedlack; Walter J Coyle; Keith L Obstein; Mohammad A Al-Haddad; Gennadiy Bakis; Jennifer A Christie; Raquel E Davila; Barry DeGregorio; Christoper J DiMaio; Brintha K Enestvedt; Jennifer Jorgensen; Daniel K Mullady; Liz Rajan
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Training and competence assessment in GI endoscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vivian E Ekkelenkamp; Arjun D Koch; Robert A de Man; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Competency Assessment Tool: reliability and validity evidence.

Authors:  Catharine M Walsh; Simon C Ling; Nitin Khanna; Samir C Grover; Jeffrey J Yu; Mary Anne Cooper; Elaine Yong; Geoffrey C Nguyen; Gary May; Thomas D Walters; Richard Reznick; Linda Rabeneck; Heather Carnahan
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Combining different methods improves assessment of competence in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Lars Konge; Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen; Louise Preisler; Lars Bo Svendsen; Yoon Soo Park
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Perk Tutor: an open-source training platform for ultrasound-guided needle insertions.

Authors:  Tamas Ungi; Derek Sargent; Eric Moult; Andras Lasso; Csaba Pinter; Robert C McGraw; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  PLUS: open-source toolkit for ultrasound-guided intervention systems.

Authors:  Andras Lasso; Tamas Heffter; Adam Rankin; Csaba Pinter; Tamas Ungi; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Expert and construct validity of the Simbionix GI Mentor II endoscopy simulator for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Arjun D Koch; Sonja N Buzink; Jeroen Heemskerk; Sanne M B I Botden; Roeland Veenendaal; Jack J Jakimowicz; Erik J Schoon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.