| Literature DB >> 29085196 |
Wei Zhang1, Shao-Lv Lai1, Jie Chen2, Dong Xie1, Fei-Xiang Wu2, Guan-Qiao Jin1, Dan-Ke Su3.
Abstract
AIM: To develop and validate a risk estimation of tumor recurrence following curative resection of operable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Entities:
Keywords: Computed tomography; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Microvascular invasion; Recurrence; Tumor capsule; Tumor margin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29085196 PMCID: PMC5643272 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i35.6467
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastroenterol ISSN: 1007-9327 Impact factor: 5.742
Quantitative and qualitative factors associated with recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma following curative resection
| MVI | Positive | 22 | 22 | 0.000 | ||
| Negative | 16 | 68 | ||||
| MVI-negative cases | ||||||
| Hepatic capsular invasion | Positive | 4 | 29 | 0.193 | ||
| Negative | 12 | 39 | ||||
| Ki67 | 30.3 ± 20.4 | 28.0 ± 21.0 | 0.686 | |||
| E-S grade | I | 1 | 6 | 0.646 | ||
| II | 8 | 36 | ||||
| III | 7 | 26 | ||||
| Largest tumor diameter, cm | 5.5 ± 3.0 | 4.8 ± 2.6 | 0.366 | |||
| Arterial phase enhanced ratio | 0.62 ± 0.34 | 0.66 ± 0.40 | 0.725 | |||
| Portovenous phase enhanced ratio | 0.77 ± 0.23 | 0.80 ± 0.33 | 0.685 | |||
| Tumor capsule | Complete | 3 | 35 | 0.023 | ||
| Incomplete | 7 | 19 | ||||
| Negative | 6 | 14 | ||||
| Necrosis | Positive | 8 | 28 | 0.521 | ||
| Negative | 8 | 40 | ||||
| Tumor margins | Smooth | 9 | 56 | 0.019 | ||
| Focal extranodular | 5 | 11 | ||||
| Multinodular | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Peritumoral enhancement | Positive | 2 | 3 | 0.24 | ||
| Negative | 14 | 65 | ||||
| AFP, ng/mL | 336.8 ± 480.4 | 357.6 ± 505.6 | 0.882 | |||
| TK1, U/L | 5.7 ± 7.8 | 2.6 ± 2.5 | 0.377 | |||
E-S classification rubric as in ref. 23.
P < 0.01 and
P < 0.05, statistically significant; Statistics are presented as mean ± SD. AFP: α-fetoprotein; E-S: Edmondson-Steiner; HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; MVI: Microvascular invasion; TK1: Thymidine kinase-1.
Figure 1Tumor margins on the liver computed tomography map. A: Portovenous phase CT showing smooth margin at liver segment VI in a 36-year-old male patient without postoperative recurrence (dashed box); B: Portovenous phase CT showing focal extranodular type at liver segments V and VIII in a 38-year-old female patient with postoperative recurrence (dashed box); C: Portovenous phase CT showing multinodular type at liver segments V and VI in a 35-year-old male patient with postoperative recurrence (dashed box). CT: Computed tomography.
Figure 2Tumor capsules on the liver computed tomography map. A: Equilibrium phase CT showing complete tumor capsule (red arrow) involvement at liver segment V in a 33-year-old male patient without postoperative recurrence (dashed box); B: Equilibrium phase CT showing incomplete tumor capsule (red arrow) at liver segments V and VI in a 57-year-old female patient with postoperative recurrence (dashed box); C: Equilibrium phase CT showing missing tumor capsule at liver segment VI in a 41-year-old male patient with postoperative recurrence (dashed box). CT: Computed tomography.