Literature DB >> 29083372

Chemo-Immunotherapy Using Lentinan for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer with Liver Metastases.

Kenji Ina1, Ryuichi Furuta2, Takae Kataoka3, Satoshi Kayukawa4, Hiroko Ina5, Masahiko Yoneda6.   

Abstract

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Systemic chemotherapy is the main treatment option for advanced gastric cancer when the tumor is inoperable. Despite recent advances in chemotherapeutic agents, the prognosis of unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer remains extremely poor. In Japan, combination therapy including S-1 and cisplatin is the standard first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer; however, the five-year survival rate remains very low. Lentinan, the backbone of beta-(1,3)-glucan with beta-(1,6) branches, an active ingredient purified from Shiitake mushrooms, has been approved as a biological response modifier for the treatment of gastric cancer. This agent has been used in combination with oral fluoropyrimidines to improve the overall survival of gastric cancer patients. A retrospective chart review on 138 metastatic gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy was performed in Nagoya Memorial Hospital from 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2015. 12 patients with liver metastases were treated by lentinan in combination with S-1-based chemotherapy. The rate of objective response was 42% (5/12) and the disease control rate was 83% (10/12) in response to chemo-immunotherapy using lentinan, with a median overall survival of 407 days (95% CI: 207-700 days).

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemo-immunotherapy; gastric cancer; lentinan; liver metastases; trastuzumab

Year:  2016        PMID: 29083372      PMCID: PMC5635777          DOI: 10.3390/medsci4020008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-3271


1. Introduction

Gastric cancer is one of the most common neoplasms and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide [1]. Systemic chemotherapy is the main treatment option for advanced gastric cancer when the tumor is inoperable [2]. Despite recent advances in chemotherapeutic agents, the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer remains poor with a median overall survival (OS) of one year [2,3]. The presence of liver metastases especially showed the worst survival among the gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy [4]. In Japan, a combination of S-1, an oral derivative of 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin is considered the standard first-line treatment for unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer [3]; however, the five-year survival rate remains very low [5]. Recent clinical studies have shown that chemo-immunotherapy using lentinan prolongs the survival of gastric cancer patients, compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy [6,7]. Lentinan, an active ingredient purified from Shiitake mushrooms, has been approved for use as a biological response modifier in the treatment of gastric cancer [8,9]. Beta-glucans stimulate macrophage to produce cytokines such as IL-12 and in turn activate adaptive immunity. The administration of lentinan was reported to enhance the antigen-presenting functions of dendritic cells, thereby inducing tumor-specific cytotoxic T cells [10]. Lentinan also upregulated the NK-cell-mediated killing of tumor cells [11]. Since T-cell function as well as NK activity are suspected to be downregulated in cancer patients, the usage of this beta-glucan might restore the host immune responses. Aiming at improving OS, lentinan was administered to gastric cancer patients with multiple liver metastases in combination with S-1-based chemotherapy.

2. Patients and Methods

A retrospective chart review on metastatic gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy was performed at Nagoya Memorial Hospital from 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2015. The original regimens of cytotoxic chemotherapy include S-1 monotherapy, S-1/cisplatin [3,5], and PSC triple therapy [12] (Table 1). 2 mg of lentinan was administered every 2 weeks in combination with chemotherapy. The objective response to chemotherapy was evaluated using the criteria proposed by the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer for the primary lesion [13] and using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1) [14] for metastatic lesions. The disappearance of all evidence of cancer for at least 4 weeks was considered a complete response (CR). According to the RECIST, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions was considered a partial response (PR). The development of a new lesion or at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions was defined as progressive disease (PD). Patients who did not satisfy the criteria for any of these categories were considered to have stable disease (SD). Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD. OS was calculated from the start of chemo-immunotherapy until death or the most recent follow-up day among the gastric cancer patients with liver metastases receiving lentinan. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot OS curves and then OS rates were compared by means of the log-rank test [3,5]between the patients showing objective response (CR and PR) and those without objective response (SD and PD). The National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria version 4.0 was applied to evaluate adverse effects. Doses were adjusted at the initiation of subsequent cycles, if severe toxicity (grade 3–4) was present.
Table 1

Characteristics of gastric cancer patients with liver metastases receiving lentinan.

CharacteristicsNumber of Patients
GenderMale8
Female4
Age (years)Range42–82
Median67
Performance status05
13
24
HER2 statusHigh2
Low10
Target lesionsPrimary9
Liver12
Lung2
Peritoneum4
Lymph nodes12
Original chemotherapyS-1 alone1
S-1/cisplatin8
PSC3

PSC: paclitaxel, S-1, and cisplatin.

3. Results

Chemotherapeutic agents were administered in 138 patients for the treatment of metastatic gastric cancer. The characteristics of 12 patients with liver metastases who received lentinan in combination with chemotherapy are summarized in Table 1. There were eight men and four women, with a median age of 67 (range, 42–82) years. Performance status was 0 in 5 patients, 1 in 3, and 2 in 4. High expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER 2) was seen in two cases, and HER2-positive rate was 16.5%. Primary gastric lesions were resected in 3 patients at the time of diagnosis of liver metastases. Metastatic lesions other than those in the liver were identified in the lung in two patients, peritoneum in four patients, and lymph nodes in all patients. The overall response rate was 42% (5/12; CR in 1, PR in 4), and the disease control rate was 83% (Table 2). The median OS of 12 cases was 407 days (95% CI: 207–700 days). When comparing the patients showing objective response (n = 5) with those with SD or PD (n = 7), OS was significantly prolonged in the former group (p < 0.05). As for the chemotherapeutic regimen, six patients were treated with triple combination chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel, S-1, and cisplatin (PSC regimen) [12] combined with lentinan. One CR was observed (#1), where oral fluoropyrimidines were stopped due to severe degree of skin adverse events. In the literature, CR has been noted in four cases, with a disappearance of the primary lesion and liver metastasis in response to chemotherapy [15,16,17,18] (Table 3). Before chemotherapy, a 72-year old man had multiple metastases to both hepatic lobes (H3), whereas the other three had liver metastasis limited to one lobe (H1). The patient with H3 achieved CR, but experienced recurrence 20 months after the start of chemotherapy [15]. In our CR case, multiple liver metastases (H3) as well as primary gastric lesion completely disappeared by chemo-immunotherapy using lentinan. This case has not experienced any recurrence for 33 months. In our series, only two patients (#4 and 5) showed high HER2 expression (Table 2). The molecular targeting agent, trastuzumab, was administered to both HER2-positive cases in combination with chemo-immunotherapy, which resulted in PR.
Table 2

Patients’ list.

CaseAgeGenderHER2S-1CisplatinTaxanesTrastsuzumabStartLastOROutcome
165MaleLow+++07.09.201031.01.2016CRAlive
267FemaleLow++21.05.201531.01.2016PRAlive
374FemaleLow+++07.12.201106.11.2013PRDead (liver failure)
471MaleHigh++++18.09.201531.01.2016PRAlive
542MaleHigh++++07.07.201531.01.2016PRAlive
658MaleLow+++01.10.201029.07.2012SDDead (obstructive jaundice)
767MaleLow++27.12.201321.11.2014SDDead (liver failure)
852FemaleLow+++27.02.201322.09.2013SDDead (meningitis)
976MaleLow++11.09.201431.12.2015SDDead (liver failure)
1075MaleLow+++08.03.201419.04.2015SDDead (liver failure)
1182MaleLow+02.03.201113.03.2012PDDead (liver failure)
1272FemaleLow++07.12.201123.02.2012PDDead (multiple organ failure)

HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; Start: the date of the initiation of chemotherapy; Last: the date of death or the most recent follow-up day; OR: objective response; CR: complete response; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; PD: progressive disease.

Table 3

Patients with liver metastases showing complete response in the literature.

AgeGenderBeforeOriginal RegimenCR Duration (Months)Recurrence
72MaleT4 N3 H3Paclitaxel/Doxifluridine14+
56MaleT4 N3 H1S-1/Cisplatin84
48MaleT4 N1 H1FOLFOX443
65FemaleT4 NX H1DOX9+
65MaleT4 N3 H3PSC plus lentinan33

H1: metastasis limited to 1 hepatic lobe; H2: scattered metastases in both lobes; H3: multiple metastases in both lobes; DOX: docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine; PSC: paclitaxel, S-1, and cisplatin.

4. Case Report

In a 42-year old man presented with remarkable hepatomegaly, liver dysfunction accompanied with a mild degree of jaundice was observed; AST 107 U/L (13–33), ALT 79 U/L (6–30), ALP 1198 U/L (115–359), LDH 1413 U/L (119–229), total bilirubin 2.1 mg/dL, CEA 4.3 ng/mL (<5.0), and CA19-9 14.6 U/mL (<37.0). Since a CT scan revealed multiple liver tumors and lymph node swelling (Figure 1a,b), he was consulted by our institution. Advanced gastric cancer type 3 with esophageal invasion was diagnosed by gastrointestinal fiberscope (Figure 2a,b). Since immune-histochemical examination of biopsy samples revealed overexpression of HER2, scored as 3+, trastuzumab was administered for the treatment of gastric cancer. After four cycles of chemo-immunotherapy comprising S-1, plus cisplatin, lentinan, and trastuzumab, re-evaluation was made, showing a good reduction of the metastatic liver tumors (Figure 1c,d) as well as the primary gastric lesion (Figure 2c,d). After two cycles of PSC triple therapy combined with lentinan and trastuzumab, further decrease in both primary and liver lesions was demonstrated. Consequently, the chemotherapeutic efficacy was diagnosed as PR.
Figure 1

CT scan showed multiple liver tumors and swellings of lymph nodes before the start of chemo-immunotherapy with trastuzumab (a,b). Liver tumors (blue arrows) and lymph nodes (red arrow heads) remarkably decreased in size after four cycles of treatment (c,d).

Figure 2

Gastrointestinal fiberscope (GIF) revealed esophageal invasion (a) and an advanced gastric cancer type 3 in cardia (b) before the initiation of chemo-immunotherapy. After four cycles of chemo-immunotherapy in combination with trastuzumab, esophageal tumor completely disappeared, leaving a whitish area (c), and both round wall and ulceration became flattened (d).

5. Discussion

Five of 12 gastric cancer patients with extensive liver metastases showed an objective response to chemo-immunotherapy using lentinan. The median OS of 12 cases exceeded one year, which is fairly good, considering that these cases had multiple liver metastases. The responders survived significantly longer than non-responders. As for the HER2 status, three patients showed an objective response among 10 individuals with its low expression and only two cases (CR, 1; PR, 1) survived, while eight other cases had already died within the two years following the initiation of original chemotherapy. In contrast, two patients with high HER2 expression, who were still on trastuzumab in combination with chemo-immunotherapy, revealed good PR. Molecular targeting agents are known to be useful for the treatment of gastric cancer [19,20], and the chemo-sensitivity difference in our cases should be associated with their status of HER2 expression. It has been reported that trastuzumab, a humanized IgG1 antibody specific for the cellular proto-oncogene HER2/neu, mediates antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicy (ADCC) [21]. The binding of lentinan to leukocytes could induce IL-12 production [10,22] and enhance the anti-tumor effects of monoclonal antibodies through augmented ADCC [23]. Considering these properties of lentinan, its synergistic action with targeting cancer therapy might be responsible for the therapeutic effects. Recently, there has been an increasing amount of evidence of sustained tumor regression in patients with melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer after treatment with immunotherapies targeting immune checkpoints such as programmed cell death-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) [24,25]. PD-L1 expression has been observed in a variety of solid tumors including gastric cancer [26,27], which engages programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) on T cells and subsequently triggers inhibitory signaling downstream of the T-cell antigen receptors, reducing T-cell killing capacity [28]. Some chemotherapeutic agents can affect PD-L1 expression in tumor cells [29,30]. Increased PD-L1 expression on cancer cells can be an important escape mechanism from the host T cell immunity [31]. We suspect that lentinan inhibit the overexpression of PD-L1 caused by cisplatin based on our preliminary experiments. An in vitro study may help provide clarity on the contribution of lentinan to the elimination of gastric cancer cells through potentiating host immune response. Lentinan was also reported to decrease prostaglandin (PG) E2 secretion [32]. Immunosuppressive properties of PGE2 are associated with inactivation of T cells and antigen-presenting cells, causing cancer progression. Lentinan can enhance the chemotherapeutic effects in drug refractory tumor microenvironment, which might lead to tumor clearance.

6. Conclusions

Lentinan serves synergistic actions with a molecular targeting agent and cytotoxic drugs through the modulation of ADCC or PD-1/PD-L1 axis, which may support the idea that the chemo-immunotherapy prolongs the survival of metastatic gastric cancer patients, compared to chemotherapy alone.
  28 in total

Review 1.  Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data.

Authors:  Anna D Wagner; Wilfried Grothe; Johannes Haerting; Gerhard Kleber; Axel Grothey; Wolfgang E Fleig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  A phase II multi-center study of triple therapy with paclitaxel, S-1 and cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  H Iwase; M Shimada; T Tsuzuki; K Ina; M Sugihara; J Haruta; M Shinoda; T Kumada; H Goto
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.935

3.  Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients.

Authors:  Roy S Herbst; Jean-Charles Soria; Marcin Kowanetz; Gregg D Fine; Omid Hamid; Michael S Gordon; Jeffery A Sosman; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Scott N Gettinger; Holbrook E K Kohrt; Leora Horn; Donald P Lawrence; Sandra Rost; Maya Leabman; Yuanyuan Xiao; Ahmad Mokatrin; Hartmut Koeppen; Priti S Hegde; Ira Mellman; Daniel S Chen; F Stephen Hodi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Cisplatin induces programmed death-1-ligand 1(PD-L1) over-expression in hepatoma H22 cells via Erk /MAPK signaling pathway.

Authors:  X Qin; C Liu; Y Zhou; G Wang
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand)       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 1.770

5.  Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Charles S Fuchs; Jiri Tomasek; Cho Jae Yong; Filip Dumitru; Rodolfo Passalacqua; Chanchal Goswami; Howard Safran; Lucas Vieira Dos Santos; Giuseppe Aprile; David R Ferry; Bohuslav Melichar; Mustapha Tehfe; Eldar Topuzov; John Raymond Zalcberg; Ian Chau; William Campbell; Choondal Sivanandan; Joanna Pikiel; Minori Koshiji; Yanzhi Hsu; Astra M Liepa; Ling Gao; Jonathan D Schwartz; Josep Tabernero
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Immunohistochemical localization of programmed death-1 ligand-1 (PD-L1) in gastric carcinoma and its clinical significance.

Authors:  Changping Wu; Yibei Zhu; Jingting Jiang; Jiemin Zhao; Xue-Guang Zhang; Ning Xu
Journal:  Acta Histochem       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 7.  Combination cancer immunotherapy and new immunomodulatory targets.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mahoney; Paul D Rennert; Gordon J Freeman
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  Chemopreventive agents induce programmed death-1-ligand 1 (PD-L1) surface expression in breast cancer cells and promote PD-L1-mediated T cell apoptosis.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Dong-Ming Su; Mei Liang; Jian Fu
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 4.407

9.  Pathological complete response induced by the combination therapy of S-1 and 24-h infusion of cisplatin in two cases initially diagnosed as inoperable advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kenji Ina; Takae Kataoka; Yuuki Takeuchi; Tomoki Fukuoka; Takaya Miwa; Tomoko Nishio; Ryuichi Furuta; Ayako Masaki; Fumiko Mori; Satoshi Kayukawa; Seiji Nagao; Takafumi Ando; Hidemi Goto
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.906

10.  PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance.

Authors:  Paul C Tumeh; Christina L Harview; Jennifer H Yearley; I Peter Shintaku; Emma J M Taylor; Lidia Robert; Bartosz Chmielowski; Marko Spasic; Gina Henry; Voicu Ciobanu; Alisha N West; Manuel Carmona; Christine Kivork; Elizabeth Seja; Grace Cherry; Antonio J Gutierrez; Tristan R Grogan; Christine Mateus; Gorana Tomasic; John A Glaspy; Ryan O Emerson; Harlan Robins; Robert H Pierce; David A Elashoff; Caroline Robert; Antoni Ribas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes after different treatments for gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Minghui Li; Bin Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Efficacy of biological response modifier lentinan with chemotherapy for advanced cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Yong Cai; Yue Zheng; Qixuan Bai; Dongling Xie; Jiufei Yu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.452

3.  Lentinan Combined with (125)I Brachytherapy for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Qin Jiang; Shuai Pang; Yifang Xia; Hongmei Sun; Yingying Yu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.650

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.