Literature DB >> 2908307

Response rate with respect to the blood pressure-lowering effect of the vasodilating and beta-blocking agent carvedilol.

R Rittinghausen1.   

Abstract

The aim of this multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled study was to evaluate the antihypertensive effect and to determine the response rates, safety and tolerability of 3 doses of carvedilol (25, 50 and 100 mg) compared with those of pindolol 15 mg, in ambulatory patients with mild to moderate uncomplicated essential hypertension. Mean supine diastolic blood pressure was the primary efficacy variable. 205 subjects between 23 and 70 years of age were randomly assigned to receive an oral dose of carvedilol or pindolol once daily for 13 weeks after a placebo run-in period of up to 4 weeks. Before administration of the study medication, blood pressure was recorded at each visit by use of the cuff method, and heart rate was counted. The results showed similar reductions in mean supine diastolic blood pressure among all 4 treatments after 13 weeks. Carvedilol showed a good and similar response rate of approximately 84% at all doses. Heart rate was not significantly changed. The number of patients having adverse experiences possibly related to drug therapy was 4, 16 and 15 with 25, 50 and 100 mg carvediolol, respectively, and 9 with pindolol 15 mg. Dizziness was the most common side effect reported for all medications. In conclusion, carvedilol 25 mg appeared to be the optimum dose in the present study, displaying a high antihypertensive potency with few side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2908307     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198800366-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  2 in total

1.  Haemodynamics of carvedilol in normal subjects compared with propranolol, pindolol, and labetalol.

Authors:  B Tomlinson; C J Cronin; B R Graham; B N Prichard
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Haemodynamic effects of carvedilol, a new beta-adrenoceptor blocker and precapillary vasodilator in essential hypertension.

Authors:  R Eggertsen; R Sivertsson; L Andrén; L Hansson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.844

  2 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Newer beta blockers and the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  D McAreavey; R Vermeulen; J I Robertson
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 2.  Carvedilol. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  C J Dunn; A P Lea; A J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Postural hypotension in elderly patients given carvedilol.

Authors:  H Krum; E L Conway; J H Broadbear; L G Howes; W J Louis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-24

Review 4.  Carvedilol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  D McTavish; D Campoli-Richards; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Antihypertensive profile of carvedilol.

Authors:  W Meyer-Sabellek; B Agrawal
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1992

Review 6.  A risk-benefit assessment of carvedilol in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  W J Louis; H Krum; E L Conway
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of carvedilol.

Authors:  T Morgan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Safety and efficacy of once-daily carvedilol vs twice-daily labetalol in mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  J P Ollivier; P Durier; J L Bussiere; J L Gayet
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Safety and antihypertensive efficacy of carvedilol and atenolol alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide.

Authors:  L Widmann; R van der Does; M Hörrmann; M Machwirth
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Efficacy and safety of carvedilol in comparison with atenolol in hypertensive patients pretreated with hydrochlorothiazide.

Authors:  R van der Does; L Widmann; H J Uberbacher; M Hörrmann; M Machwirth; U Stienen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.953

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.