Literature DB >> 1974506

Efficacy and safety of carvedilol in comparison with atenolol in hypertensive patients pretreated with hydrochlorothiazide.

R van der Does1, L Widmann, H J Uberbacher, M Hörrmann, M Machwirth, U Stienen.   

Abstract

Carvedilol [25 mg once daily] (o.d.) was compared to atenolol (50 mg o.d.) as an adjunct to pre-existing hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate hypertension [diastolic blood pressure (DBP), 100-115 mm Hg]. After a placebo run-in phase of 2 weeks, 131 patients received 25 mg HCTZ o.d. for 4 weeks. In all, 122 patients were transferred to the double-blind phase, in which 25 mg carvedilol or 50 mg atenolol was randomly added to HCTZ. After an additional 6 weeks of treatment, 112 patients were evaluable for efficacy (C/HCTZ group, n = 54; A/HCTZ group, n = 58). Blood pressure was measured and the heart rate was counted before medication, at 2-week intervals throughout the trial, and 2 h after medication on the 1st and the last day of the combination treatment period. Serum lipids were measured in addition to routine laboratory variables. A therapeutic response was defined as a reduction in supine and standing diastolic blood pressure to values of less than 90 mm Hg. In a relatively low number of patients (6 of 131), a response as defined above was achieved with HCTZ alone. This may be accounted for by the fact that patients were required to have a diastolic blood pressure of at least 100 mg Hg and by the relatively short period of monotherapy. The two groups of patients receiving different combination treatments were well matched for demographic data and blood pressure values before the adjunct was added. In both groups there was a marked additional blood pressure decrease on the initiation of combined treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1974506     DOI: 10.1007/bf01409486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  12 in total

1.  Response rate with respect to the blood pressure-lowering effect of the vasodilating and beta-blocking agent carvedilol.

Authors:  R Rittinghausen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Pharmacokinetics of atenolol in hypertensive subjects with and without co-administration of chlorthalidone.

Authors:  E Riva; P L Farina; R Sega; G Tognoni; W Bastain; J McAinsh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Antihypertensive effect of oral timolol maleate and hydrochlorothiazide once daily compared with hydrochlorothiazide once daily.

Authors:  Y Durley; R B Cubberley; S Thomas
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1981-08

4.  Carvedilol for systemic hypertension.

Authors:  M E Heber; G S Brigden; M P Caruana; A Lahiri; E B Raftery
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1987-02-15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Antihypertensive effect of various doses of hydrochlorothiazide and its relation to the plasma level of the drug.

Authors:  B Beermann; M Groschinsky-grind
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1978-05-31       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Haemodynamic effects of carvedilol, a new beta-adrenoceptor blocker and precapillary vasodilator in essential hypertension.

Authors:  R Eggertsen; R Sivertsson; L Andrén; L Hansson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Multiple risk factor intervention trial. Risk factor changes and mortality results. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Pharmacological profile of carvedilol, a compound with beta-blocking and vasodilating properties.

Authors:  K Strein; G Sponer; B Müller-Beckmann; W Bartsch
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.105

9.  Circadian antihypertensive profile of carvedilol (BM 14190).

Authors:  W Meyer-Sabellek; K L Schulte; A Distler; R Gotzen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.105

10.  Comparison of propranolol and hydrochlorothiazide for the initial treatment of hypertension. II. Results of long-term therapy. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-10-22       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Carvedilol. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  C J Dunn; A P Lea; A J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Carvedilol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  D McTavish; D Campoli-Richards; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  A risk-benefit assessment of carvedilol in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  W J Louis; H Krum; E L Conway
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of carvedilol.

Authors:  T Morgan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Use of carvedilol in hypertension: an update.

Authors:  Gastone Leonetti; Colin G Egan
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2012-05-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.