PURPOSE: To study corneal innervation in eyes with history of herpetic keratitis and its correlation with corneal sensitivity and biomechanical properties. METHODS: A total of 56 eyes were included, of which 16 had a history of unilateral immune stromal herpetic keratitis, 16 were their contralateral eyes, and 20 were healthy controls. Structural analysis of corneal nerve plexus was performed by confocal microscopy. Biomechanical properties were measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer. Corneal sensitivity was assessed by contact (Cochet-Bonnet) and non-contact (Belmonte) esthesiometry. RESULTS: The eyes with a history of herpetic keratitis had reduced sensitivity for mechanical stimuli when compared to healthy eyes (1441.88 ± 83 ml/min vs. 67.9 ± 7.86 ml/min). Nerve fiber density in the corneas with a history of herpetic disease was lower (4.13 ± 2.19 U/image) than in the contralateral eyes (7.44 ± 2.9 U/image, p value = 0.01) and than in healthy controls (10.35 ± 2.01, p value < 0.0001). The best structural and functional correlation was established between the total length of nerves per section and mechanic threshold assessed by Belmonte esthesiometer (Coef. -0.58 p value < 0.0001) and between total length of nerves and corneal resistance factor (CRF) (Coef. -0.64, p value < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The corneal sensitivity impairment in eyes with immune stromal herpetic keratitis can be explained by the loss of nerve fibers. Biomechanical corneal properties are affected as well. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and CRF are lower for the eyes with a history of herpetic keratitis, and also for the contralateral eye when compared to healthy controls.
PURPOSE: To study corneal innervation in eyes with history of herpetic keratitis and its correlation with corneal sensitivity and biomechanical properties. METHODS: A total of 56 eyes were included, of which 16 had a history of unilateral immune stromal herpetic keratitis, 16 were their contralateral eyes, and 20 were healthy controls. Structural analysis of corneal nerve plexus was performed by confocal microscopy. Biomechanical properties were measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer. Corneal sensitivity was assessed by contact (Cochet-Bonnet) and non-contact (Belmonte) esthesiometry. RESULTS: The eyes with a history of herpetic keratitis had reduced sensitivity for mechanical stimuli when compared to healthy eyes (1441.88 ± 83 ml/min vs. 67.9 ± 7.86 ml/min). Nerve fiber density in the corneas with a history of herpetic disease was lower (4.13 ± 2.19 U/image) than in the contralateral eyes (7.44 ± 2.9 U/image, p value = 0.01) and than in healthy controls (10.35 ± 2.01, p value < 0.0001). The best structural and functional correlation was established between the total length of nerves per section and mechanic threshold assessed by Belmonte esthesiometer (Coef. -0.58 p value < 0.0001) and between total length of nerves and corneal resistance factor (CRF) (Coef. -0.64, p value < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The corneal sensitivity impairment in eyes with immune stromal herpetic keratitis can be explained by the loss of nerve fibers. Biomechanical corneal properties are affected as well. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and CRF are lower for the eyes with a history of herpetic keratitis, and also for the contralateral eye when compared to healthy controls.
Authors: Paul Cottrell; Sohail Ahmed; Catherine James; James Hodson; Peter J McDonnell; Saaeha Rauz; Geraint P Williams Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Andrea Cruzat; Wolfgang A Schrems; Laura M Schrems-Hoesl; Bernardo M Cavalcanti; Neda Baniasadi; Deborah Witkin; Deborah Pavan-Langston; Reza Dana; Pedram Hamrah Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Pedram Hamrah; Andrea Cruzat; Mohammad H Dastjerdi; Lixin Zheng; Bashar M Shahatit; Hasan A Bayhan; Reza Dana; Deborah Pavan-Langston Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Pedram Hamrah; Afsun Sahin; Mohammad H Dastjerdi; Bashar M Shahatit; Hasan A Bayhan; Reza Dana; Deborah Pavan-Langston Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 12.079