Present study aimed to determine the effect of 'bitter melon', a popularly used fruit in Bangladesh and several other Asian countries, on high-fat-diet-induced type 2 diabetes. To investigate the effect, ethanol extract from bitter melon (BME) as a dietary supplement with mouse chow was used. BME was found to significantly attenuate the high-fat diet (HFD) -induced body weight and total fat mass. BME also effectively reduced the insulin resistance induced by the HFD. Furthermore, dietary supplementation of BME was highly effective in increasing insulin sensitivity and reducing hepatic fat and obesity. These results indicate that BME could be effective in attenuating type 2 diabetes and could therefore be a preventive measure against type 2 diabetes.
Present study aimed to determine the effect of 'bitter melon', a popularly used fruit in Bangladesh and several other Asian countries, on high-fat-diet-induced type 2 diabetes. To investigate the effect, ethanol extract from bitter melon (BME) as a dietary supplement with mouse chow was used. BME was found to significantly attenuate the high-fat diet (HFD) -induced body weight and total fat mass. BME also effectively reduced the insulin resistance induced by the HFD. Furthermore, dietary supplementation of BME was highly effective in increasing insulin sensitivity and reducing hepatic fat and obesity. These results indicate that BME could be effective in attenuating type 2 diabetes and could therefore be a preventive measure against type 2 diabetes.
Metabolic disorders such as obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are leading causes of
morbidity and mortality for the world’s growing population (Rodgers et al., 2005; Deshpande
et al., 2008; Pfluger et al.,
2008). In particular, T2DM is the most common, accounting for 90% of patients
in these categories (Wang et al., 2017).
Therefore, the effective control of blood glucose is the key to preventing adverse
impacts on the quality of life for type 2 diabetespatients (Shafiee et al., 2012). T2DM is caused by resistance to the
action of insulin combined with a deficiency in insulin secretion; recently,
functional foods and their bioactive compounds have been found to be useful as
complementary treatments for T2DM (Patel et al.,
2012).Bitter melon (Momordica charantia L.; MC), or bitter gourd, is a
popular plant used for its anti-diabetic, anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory and
cholesterol-lowering effects among the indigenous populations of Asia, South
America, India, the Caribbean and East Africa. In Chinese and Indian traditional
medicine, bitter melon has typically been used to treat hypoglycemia and diabetes
(Tan et al., 2008).In previous studies, this plant was reported to have a preventive effect on the
development of hyperglycemia in KK-Ay mice, which spontaneously develop
T2DM (Alam et al., 2015). It was expected from
these results that bitter melon would exhibit anti-diabetic effects in other
diabetic animal models with insulin resistance (Efird
et al., 2014). The physiologically active substance of bitter melon has
been reported to be optimized by ethanol extraction (Fulco & Sartorelli, 2008).Recent epidemiological studies have indicated that the consumption of a high-calorie
diet and the ensuing obesity are two of the principal causes of T2DM (Steyn et al., 2004). Therefore, an
obesity-induced experimental model of T2DM induced by a high-calorie diet would be
useful for evaluating the anti-diabetic action of bitter melon extract (Alam et al., 2015). C57BL/6 mice fed a high-fat
diet (HFD) have been shown to be a representative model of obesity-induced diabetes
(Hu & Malik, 2010). The HFD causes
insulin resistance, and insulin sensitivity is associated with the expression of
Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) (Mayoral et al., 2015). The
SIRT1 pathway regulates energy homeo- stasis at the cellular and whole-body level.
It plays a central role in the regulation of glucose uptake and insulin sensitivity
(Li, 2013).Many studies have reported that the expression of SIRT1 plays a role in glucose
metabolism (de Kreutzenberg et al., 2010;
Li & Kazgan, 2011; Kitada & Koya, 2013). In the present study,
we found that ethanol extract of bitter melon has anti-obesity and anti-diabetic
effects through sirt1 in the liver tissue. Therefore, we believe that the
physiologically active substance of bitter melon can be used as an anti-diabetic
agent to improve glucose metabolism by SIRT1.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
1. Preparation of ethanol extract of bitter melon (Momordica
charantia L.; MC)
Three batches (No. DHP20160217-20160219) of standardized ethanol extract of
bitter melon (BME) compound were manufactured and verified by Daeho Corporation
Co., Ltd. (Hwaseong, Korea). Briefly, the dried unripe fruit of bitter melon
(Hamyang, Korea/Cheonryung Foods Co., Ltd.) was shattered and extracted by
heating twice at 70℃ (4 h and 2 h) using 70% ethanol. The extract was then
filtered and concentrated (Busung Tech, Ansung, Korea) to 15-20 degrees Brix at
65℃. The concentrated extract was spray dried (Mehyun Engineering, Anyang,
Korea) at inlet temperature 175 ± 10℃ and outlet temperature 80 ± 5℃, and
dextrin (49%) and lecithin (1%) were added. The extraction yield was
approximately 34% (w/w).
2. High-fat-diet (HFD)-induced diabetic mice
Five-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were purchased from Central Lab Animal Inc.
(Seoul, Republic of Korea). After an adaptation period of 1 week, the mice were
randomly divided into four groups (n = 8-12). The normal diet group (ND) was fed
a chow diet (10% kcal from fat, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, Research Diets; D12450B)
or a high-fat diet (HFD) (45% kcal from fat, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, Research
Diets; D12451) for 12 weeks and then was fed an HFD supplemented with BME 250
(250 mg/kg body weight/ day) or an HFD supplemented with BME 500 (500 mg/kg body
weight/day) for 12 weeks. The animals were housed in a temperature-controlled
environment with a 12-h light /dark cycle during the entire 12-week experimental
period.The animals’ food intake and body weight were measured weekly. At the end of the
experimental period, the animals were sacrificed. Blood samples were collected
from the heart using a 1-mL syringe and were drawn into a 5-mL VACUETTE tube
(Greiner Bio-one, Thailand). After being centrifuged at 1,500 ×g for 10 min, the
serum was stored at –80℃ until analysis. The liver was removed and weighed.
Portions of mesenteric liver were immersed in 4% neutralized buffered
paraformaldehyde (NBP) for histological inspection; other portions were frozen
immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80℃ for RNA and protein samples.
The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use
Committee of Gyeongsang National University (Jinju, Republic of Korea).
3. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining
Fixed liver tissue in 4% neutral paraformaldehyde was dehydrated though a graded
series of ethanol (70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100% absolute ethanol) for 2 h per
concentration, cleared in two changes of xylene for 2 h per change and
impregnated using two changes of molten paraffin wax for 2 h per change in a
Leica tissue processor (Leica TP 1020, Germany). The embedded tissue was
sectioned at a thickness of 5 µm with a microtome (Leica RM2235, Germany) and
subjected to H&E staining. All the stained tissue sections were imaged with
a virtual slide microscope (VS120 S1, Olympus BX61 VST, Hamburg, Germany) at ×20
magnification with Olyvia software.
4. Oil red O staining
Fixed liver tissue in 4% neutral paraformaldehyde was cryoprotected in 30%
sucrose and embedded in Tissue-Tek optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound
(Sakura Fineteck USA, Inc., Torrance, CA, USA). The embedded tissue was
cryosectioned at a thickness of 5 µm using a cryostat (Leica CM 1950, Germany)
and subjected to oil red O staining with an Oil Red O kit (Abcam #ab 150678).
All the stained tissue sections were imaged with a virtual slide microscope
(VS120 S1, Olympus BX61 VST, Hamburg, Germany) at ×20 magnification with Olyvia
software.
5. Analysis of serum
Serum samples were used to measure the content of free fatty acid (FFA), glucose,
insulin, C-peptide, total cholesterol (TC) and low-density
lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C). These analyses were carried out at the Green
Cross Reference Laboratory (Seoul, Republic of Korea). C-peptide was measured
with the Lbis (R) Mouse C-peptide ELISA kit (U type) (Shibayagi Co., Ltd.,
Japan).
6. Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance and in insulin tolerance
The ND was fed a chow diet or a HFD for 12 weeks and then was fed an HFD
supplemented with BME 250 or an HFD supplemented with BME 500 for 12 weeks. The
performed glucose tolerance tests with HFD, BME 250 and 500 mice before and
after transplantation after 16 h of fasting by measuring glycemic values in
peripheral blood following intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 4 g/kg body
weight glucose in saline. Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) under
stress conditions was performed by keeping the animals inside restraining boxes
and injecting i.p. 2g/kg glucose in saline. Intraperitoneal insulin tolerance
tests (IPITT) were performed on random-fed mice after i.p. injection of 0.75
U/kg insulin in saline.
7. Western blot and protein quantification
Tissues were lysed RIPA buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
Total protein concentrations were determined using BCA assay (PIERCE, Rockford,
IL, USA). An equal volume of 4× SDS sample buffer was added, and the samples
were boiled for 5 min. Equivalent amounts of total protein (20-60 μg) were
separated by SDS-PAGE on 8-12% polyacrylamide gel and then transferred to
nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% skim milk or 3% BSA in
0.1% Tween-20/Tris buffered saline (TBS-T). The membrane was incubated with
SirT1 (1:1000, #2493, Cell Signaling Technology, MA), PPARα (1:1000, Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, CA), SREBP-1(1: 1000, sc-8984, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), AMPK
(1: 1000, #2532, Cell Signaling Technology), p-AMPK (1: 1000, #2535, Cell
Signaling Technology), ACC (1:1000, #3676, Cell Signaling Technology), p-ACC
(1:1000, #11818, Cell Signaling Technology), α-tublin (1:10000, A11126, Thermo
Fisher Scientific) and β-actin (1:10000, MA5-15739, Thermo Fisher Scientific )
antibodies overnight at 4℃.
8. Statistical analysis
The data are expressed as the mean and standard error of the mean (means ± SEM).
The differences among the groups were analyzed by one-way analyses of variance
(ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s HSD test in the GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad
Software Inc., La Jolla, CA).
Results
1. Effects of BME on body weight gain and organ weight
The C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into four groups (n = 8-12). The first
group was fed a normal diet (ND), the second was fed a HFD, and the other two
groups were fed an HFD supplemented with 250 mg BME/kg BW (BME 250) and 500 mg
BME/kg BW (BME 500), respectively. The body-weight gain in the HFD group was
significantly greater than that in the ND group. Notably, the body-weight gain
in both the BME 250 and the BME 500 group was significantly lower than that in
the HFD group (Fig. 1A). Whereas food
intake in both the BME 250 and the BME 500 group was not significantly different
than that in the HFD group (Fig. 1B). The
weight of individual or total white adipose tissue (total WAT, epididymal,
perirenal, and mesenteric) was significantly greater in the HFD group than in
the ND group. The WAT weight decreased significantly after the administration of
BME (Fig. 1C). BME inhibited visceral fat
accumulation without affecting food intake. Liver weight decreased significantly
more in the BME 250 and the BME 500 group than in the HFD group (Fig. 1D). The H&E and oil red O staining
showed that BME ameliorated hepatic steatosis more in the BME 500 group than in
the HFD group (Fig. 1E).
Fig. 1
Effects of BME on body weight gain, food intake, and organ
weight.
(A) body weight gain, (B) food intake rate, (C) WAT weight,(D) liver
weight, (E) liver stained with Oil red O. ND, normal-fat diet; HFD,
high-fat diet: BME 250, HFD plus 250 mg/ kg of ethanol extract powder of
bitter melon; BME 500, HFD plus 500 mg/kg of ethanol extract powder of
bitter melon. Values are expressed as a mean ± SEM (n=8).
*p<0.05,
**p<0.01
***p<0.005 vs. the HFD group.
Effects of BME on body weight gain, food intake, and organ
weight.
(A) body weight gain, (B) food intake rate, (C) WAT weight,(D) liver
weight, (E) liver stained with Oil red O. ND, normal-fat diet; HFD,
high-fat diet: BME 250, HFD plus 250 mg/ kg of ethanol extract powder of
bitter melon; BME 500, HFD plus 500 mg/kg of ethanol extract powder of
bitter melon. Values are expressed as a mean ± SEM (n=8).
*p<0.05,
**p<0.01
***p<0.005 vs. the HFD group.
2. Effect of BME on plasma lipids
The plasma lipid (total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, FFA) levels in the serum
decreased significantly in the BME 250 and 500 groups compared with the HFD
group (Fig. 2 A-C). As lipolysis,
circulating free fatty acids under insulin resistance conditions, these results
demonstrate that the decrease in plasma lipids may contribute at least partially
to the improvement of diabetes.
Fig. 2
Effects of BME on serum levels of lipid.
(A) plasma total cholesterol levels, (B) plasma LDL cholesterol levels,
(C) plasma FFA cholesterol levels. ND, normal-fat diet; HFD, high-fat
diet: BME 250, HFD plus 250 mg/kg of ethanol extract powder of bitter
melon; BME 500, HFD plus 500 mg/kg of ethanol extract powder of bitter
melon. Values are expressed as a mean ± SEM (n=8).
*p<0.05,
**p<0.01
***p<0.005 vs. the HFD group.
Effects of BME on serum levels of lipid.
(A) plasma total cholesterol levels, (B) plasma LDL cholesterol levels,
(C) plasma FFA cholesterol levels. ND, normal-fat diet; HFD, high-fat
diet: BME 250, HFD plus 250 mg/kg of ethanol extract powder of bitter
melon; BME 500, HFD plus 500 mg/kg of ethanol extract powder of bitter
melon. Values are expressed as a mean ± SEM (n=8).
*p<0.05,
**p<0.01
***p<0.005 vs. the HFD group.
3. Effects of BME on glucose intolerance
The effects of BME supplementation on fasting blood glucose levels decreased
significantly more in the BME 250 and 500 groups than in the HFD group (Fig. 3A), and the plasma insulin and
C-peptide levels decreased more in the BME 500 group than in the HFD group
(Fig. 3 B-C).
Fig. 3
Effects of BME on the plasma biochemical parameters.
(A) plasma fasting glucose levels, (B) plasma insulin levels, (C) plasma
C-peptide levels, (D) IPITT, (E) IPGTT. ND, normal-fat diet; HFD,
High-fat diet; BME 250, HFD plus 250 mg/kg of ethanol extract powder of
bitter melon; BME 500, HFD plus 500 mg/kg of ethanol extract powder of
bitter melon. Values are expressed as a mean ± SEM (n=8).
*p<0.05,
**p<0.01
***p<0.005 vs. the HFD group.
An IPGTT performed to determine the effect of BME on glucose tolerance data
showed that the glucose concentration was significantly lower in the BME 200 and
BME 500 groups than in the HFD group at 30, 60 and 120 min postglucose i.p.
injection (Fig. 3D). Glucose disappearance,
based on IPITT results, demonstrated that BME significantly improved glucose
disposal ability by enhancing insulin sensitivity (Fig. 3E).
Effects of BME on the plasma biochemical parameters.
(A) plasma fasting glucose levels, (B) plasma insulin levels, (C) plasma
C-peptide levels, (D) IPITT, (E) IPGTT. ND, normal-fat diet; HFD,
High-fat diet; BME 250, HFD plus 250 mg/kg of ethanol extract powder of
bitter melon; BME 500, HFD plus 500 mg/kg of ethanol extract powder of
bitter melon. Values are expressed as a mean ± SEM (n=8).
*p<0.05,
**p<0.01
***p<0.005 vs. the HFD group.
4. BME activation of the SIRT1 signaling pathway in the liver
To elucidate which genes are involved in the antisteatotic and anti-diabetic
effect of BME, the expressions of the genes related to hepatic lipid metabolism
were measured by quantitative Western blot. The HFD group had a significantly
lower expression of SIRT1 than the BME 250 and 500 groups. The BME groups showed
a significant increase in the hepatic expression levels of SIRT1 (Fig. 4A). Similarly, the expression of
phospho-AMPK (p-AMPK), p-ACC and ACC increased significantly in the BME 500
group (Fig. 4B). The down-signaling
molecules of SIRT1, such as Foxo1 and PPARα were increased significantly and
SREBP1c was decreased significant in the BME 250 and 500 group (Fig. 4C).
Fig. 4
Effects of BME on hepatic metabolic signaling pathway.
(A) protein expressions of liver SIRT1 (B), phosphorylated AMPK, ACC (C),
SIRT1, Foxo1, PPARα and SREBP1c were determined by Western blotting. HFD
was used as a control and β-actin, α- tubulin ware used as a loading
control.
Effects of BME on hepatic metabolic signaling pathway.
(A) protein expressions of liver SIRT1 (B), phosphorylated AMPK, ACC (C),
SIRT1, Foxo1, PPARα and SREBP1c were determined by Western blotting. HFD
was used as a control and β-actin, α- tubulin ware used as a loading
control.
Discussion
In the present study, we demonstrated that the effect of bitter melon extract on the
HFD-induced obesity and T2DM in C57BL/6 mice. Already numerous people use bitter
melon for the prevention and primary therapeutics for the early T2DM like status.
This study aimed to evaluate the precise effects of bitter melon on the lipid
accumulation and development of T2DM. We used only premature bitter melon (before
the formation of seed) to avoid the toxicity.One of the hallmarks of the development of metabolic syndrome and T2DM is the
elevation of ectopic lipid accumulation in non-subcutaneous adipose stores
(increased central adiposity, muscle and liver lipid accumulation) (Lara-Castro & Garvey, 2008). BME inhibited
visceral fat accumulation without affecting food intake. Therefore, it is suggested
that an adequate administration of BME might effectively reduce hepatic steatosis.
Actually, increased visceral adiposity is characterized as an important factor in
the development of T2DM in human subjects (Bray et
al., 2008; Ginsberg & MacCallum,
2009). Numerous studies have demonstrated the link between ectopic fat
deposition and insulin resistance in persons with overt T2DM (Unger, 2003; Lara-Castro &
Garvey, 2008). Momordica charantia is a food source that
contains various bioactive compounds with health benefits (Ruda-Kucerova et al., 2015). Previous studies have shown that
in mice fed HFD, freeze-dried Momordica charantia juice was found
to possess the potential to reduce adiposity, and extracts from this plant may
reduce visceral obesity (Chen et al., 2003;
Alam et al., 2015; Mahmoud et al., 2017).In present study, we investigated whether BME could improve HFD-induced obesity in
C57BL/6 mice and explored the mechanisms. C57BL/6 mice were maintained on an ND or
HFD for 12 weeks and then fed the ND, HFD, BME 250, or BME 500 for another 12 weeks.
The weekly food intakes among the groups did not differ from each other. BME
obviously reduced the weight of WAT and the liver in the HFD group, which was
consistent with the results of changes in body weight. These results suggested that
the BME-mediated decrease in body weight was attributable to a reduction in the
weight of WAT and the liver independent of food intake.It has been reported that hyperglycemia is the defined pathological feature of T2DM.
Effective control of glucose levels is crucial for preventing diabetic complications
and improving patients’ quality of life (Shafiee et
al., 2012; Agrawal, 2016). Present
results of IPGGT and IPITT suggested that BME may improve T2DM pathologies by
alleviating hyperglycemia.SIRT1 mediates metabolic benefits in various tissues. In the liver, SIRT1 supports
gluconeogenesis via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARα) and forkhead
box O1 (FOXO1) (Rodgers et al., 2005) and
inhibits fatty acid synthesis by targeting sterol regulatory element binding protein
1c (SREBP1c) for degradation (Walker et al.,
2010). The down-signaling molecules of SIRT1, such as Foxo1 and PPARα
were increased significantly and SREBP1c was decreased significant in the BME
administrated animals. These findings showed that BME increased hepatic
gluconeogenesis and fatty acid use by up-regulating a SIRT1 signaling pathway. As
also, BME up-regulated the expression levels of p-AMPK and p-ACC. These data showed
that on one hand, BME may up-regulate SIRT1 to induce gluconeogenesis; on the other
hand, it may stimulate AMPK and ACC to promote fatty acid oxidation in the liver.
Recent studies have shown that aqueous extract of Momordica
charantia seeds regulated the insulin signaling pathway in muscles and
adipose tissues primarily by targeting insulin receptors (IR) (Lo et al., 2013). Here, for the first time, we illustrated that
BME reinforce HFD-induced gluconeogenesis and fatty acid use in the livers of mice
by modulating SIRT1 signaling. SIRT1 is involved in protection against metabolic
syndrome. However, SIRT1’s purpose in protecting against metabolic syndrome is known
mostly through indirect evidence by using the chemical activators of SIRT1(Pfluger et al., 2008). Studies have
demonstrated the beneficial effects of bitter melon extract on HFD-induced obesity,
including the improvement of insulin sensitivity and hepatic steatosis by regulating
the SIRT1 signaling pathway. Similarly, in this study, BME not only enhanced the
expression levels of SIRT1 but also up-regulated Foxo1 and PPARα, as also
down-regulated SREBP1c. In fact, the underlying mechanisms of hepatic metabolism in
these animal models are different; it seems that BME may act on a particular
pathway, depending on the cause of T2DM development. In this study, BME increased
the phosphorylation levels of AMPK in the liver. Briefly, the stimulation of AMPK in
the liver may be the consequence of a reduction in the AMPK/ACC pathway, not the
SIRT1/ AMPK pathway.In conclusion, BME not only attenuated HFD-induced hepatic steatosis but also
ameliorated HFD-induced insulin resistance by improving insulin sensitivity. The
reduced circulatory insulin inhibited expressions of lipogenic genes in the liver
and attenuated hepatic steatosis.In summary, BME greatly enhanced insulin sensitivity, reversed liver steatosis,
reduced body-fat mass and increased the expression level of SIRT1 in mice with
HFD-induced T2DM. This study suggested that the favorable effects of BME on
increasing insulin sensitivity and attenuating hepatic steatosis may be attributed
to the mediation of SIRT1 and AMPK-ACC signaling. Therefore, BME can be viewed as a
potential natural resource for the development of new therapeutic alternatives in
the treatment of obesity and T2DM.
Authors: Amy K Walker; Fajun Yang; Karen Jiang; Jun-Yuan Ji; Jennifer L Watts; Aparna Purushotham; Olivier Boss; Michael L Hirsch; Scott Ribich; Jesse J Smith; Kristine Israelian; Christoph H Westphal; Joseph T Rodgers; Toshi Shioda; Sarah L Elson; Peter Mulligan; Hani Najafi-Shoushtari; Josh C Black; Jitendra K Thakur; Lisa C Kadyk; Johnathan R Whetstine; Raul Mostoslavsky; Pere Puigserver; Xiaoling Li; Nicholas J Dyson; Anne C Hart; Anders M Näär Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Joseph T Rodgers; Carlos Lerin; Wilhelm Haas; Steven P Gygi; Bruce M Spiegelman; Pere Puigserver Journal: Nature Date: 2005-03-03 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Paul J Pistell; Tadanobu Utsuki; Joseph Francis; Philip J Ebenezer; Jennifer Terrebonne; George S Roth; Donald K Ingram Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-12-29 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Pandora E White; Ewelina Król; Artur Szwengiel; Małgorzata Tubacka; Dawid Szczepankiewicz; Halina Staniek; John B Vincent; Zbigniew Krejpcio Journal: Biol Trace Elem Res Date: 2020-06-02 Impact factor: 3.738