Literature DB >> 29080110

Outpatient groin hernia repair: assessment of 9330 patients from the French "Club Hernie" database.

F Drissi1, F Jurczak2, J P Cossa3, J F Gillion4, C Baayen5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Groin hernia repair (GHR) is one of the most frequent surgical interventions practiced worldwide. Outpatient surgery for GHR is known to be safe and effective. AIM: To assess the outpatient practice for GHR in France and identify predictive factors of failure.
METHOD: Forty one surgeons of the French "Club Hernie" prospectively gathered data concerning successive GHR over a period of 4 years within a multicenter database.
RESULTS: A total of 9330 patients were operated on during the period of the study. Mean age was 61.8 (1-100) years old and 8245 patients (88.4%) were males. 6974 GHR (74.7%) were performed as outpatient procedures. In 262 patients (3.6%), the outpatient setting, previously selected, did not succeed. Upon multivariate analysis, predictive factors of ambulatory failure were ASA grade ≥ III (OR 0.42, p < 0.001), bilateral GHR (OR 0.47, p < 0.001), emergency surgery for incarcerated hernia (OR 0.10, p < 0.001), spinal anesthesia (OR 0.27, p < 0.001) and occurrence of an early post-operative complication (OR 0.07, p < 0.001). The more frequent complications were acute urinary retention and surgical site collections. 2094 patients (21.5%) were not selected preoperatively for 1-day surgery.
CONCLUSION: More than 74% of the patients benefited from outpatient surgery for GHR with a poor failure rate. Predictive factors of outpatient GHR failure were ASA grade ≥ III, bilateral GHR, emergency surgery for incarcerated hernia, spinal anesthesia and occurrence of an early post-operative complication. Ambulatory failures were often related to social issues or medical complications. Outpatient surgery criteria could become less restrictive in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory; Groin hernia repair; Laparoscopic groin hernia repair; Outpatient

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29080110     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-017-1689-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  9 in total

1.  Outpatient repair for inguinal hernia in elderly patients: still a challenge?

Authors:  Piergaspare Palumbo; Chiara Amatucci; Bruno Perotti; Antonio Zullino; Claudia Dezzi; Giulio Illuminati; Francesco Vietri
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 6.071

2.  Inguinal hernia repair: are ASA grades 3 and 4 patients suitable for day case hernia repair?

Authors:  P Sanjay; P Jones; A Woodward
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.

Authors:  Pierre A Clavien; Jeffrey Barkun; Michelle L de Oliveira; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Daniel Dindo; Richard D Schulick; Eduardo de Santibañes; Juan Pekolj; Ksenija Slankamenac; Claudio Bassi; Rolf Graf; René Vonlanthen; Robert Padbury; John L Cameron; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.

Authors:  Torsten Hothorn; Frank Bretz; Peter Westfall
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.207

5.  Ambulatory groin and ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  P Ngo; E Pélissier; H Levard; T Perniceni; C Denet; B Gayet
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 2.043

6.  European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M P Simons; T Aufenacker; M Bay-Nielsen; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; D de Lange; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; A Kingsnorth; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M Miserez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Day-surgery inguinal hernia repair in the elderly: single centre experience.

Authors:  Bruno Amato; Rita Compagna; Francesca Fappiano; Roberto Rossi; Tommaso Bianco; Michele Danzi; Antonello Accurso; Raffaele Serra; Giovanni Aprea; Salvatore Massa
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Nationwide quality improvement of groin hernia repair from the Danish Hernia Database of 87,840 patients from 1998 to 2005.

Authors:  H Kehlet; M Bay-Nielsen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Increased rate of day surgery use for inguinal and femoral hernia repair in a decade of hospital admissions in the Veneto Region (north-east Italy): a record linkage study.

Authors:  Mario Saia; Domenico Mantoan; Alessandra Buja; Chiara Bertoncello; Tatjana Baldovin; Chiara Zanardo; Giampietro Callegaro; Vincenzo Baldo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Patient's satisfaction at 2 years after groin hernia repair: any difference according to the technique?

Authors:  B Romain; J-F Gillion; P Ortega-Deballon; N Meyer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  What is the reality in outpatient vs inpatient groin hernia repair? An analysis from the Herniamed Registry.

Authors:  F Köckerling; R Lorenz; W Reinpold; K Zarras; J Conze; A Kuthe; B Lammers; B Stechemesser; F Mayer; R Fortelny; H Hoffmann; J Kukleta; D Weyhe
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 2.920

3.  Quality of life after laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair: spinal vs general anesthesia.

Authors:  C Sarakatsianou; I Baloyiannis; K Perivoliotis; S Georgopoulou; G Tzovaras
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.739

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.