| Literature DB >> 29078812 |
Bruno Tilocca1, Katharina Burbach1, Charlotte M E Heyer1,2, Ludwig E Hoelzle1, Rainer Mosenthin1, Volker Stefanski1, Amélia Camarinha-Silva1, Jana Seifert3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The possible impact of changes in diet composition on the intestinal microbiome is mostly studied after some days of adaptation to the diet of interest. The question arises if a few days are enough to reflect the microbial response to the diet by changing the community composition and function. The present study investigated the fecal microbiome of pigs during a time span of 4 weeks after a dietary change to obtain insights regarding the time required for adaptation. Four different diets were used differing in either protein source (field peas meal vs. soybean meal) or the concentration of calcium and phosphorus (CaP).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29078812 PMCID: PMC5659009 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-017-0362-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Fecal samples were collected seven times across an experimental time span of 4 weeks and independently subjected to both 16S rRNA gene sequencing and metaproteomic investigation (X)
| Animal number | Diet | Experimental period | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| week | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||
| day | 3 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 25 | 32 | ||
| 01 | R4 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| 03 | R3 | X | X | X | X* | X | X | X | |
| 04 | R1 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| 05 | R4 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| 06 | R2 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| 07 | R1 | X | X | X | X | X* | X | X | |
| 08 | R4 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| 11 | R2 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| 12 | R3 | X* | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| 13 | R1 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| 15 | R2 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| 16 | R3 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
Failed DNA analyses are indicated by X*. R1 corn-soybean, high-digestible (HD), high CaP; R2 corn-soybean, HD, low CaP; R3 corn-field pea, low digestible (LD), high CaP; R4 corn-field pea, LD, low CaP
Fig. 1Samples ordination reveals three adaptation periods. a and b panels illustrate the ordination of the dataset obtained from the 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach. c and d panels show the metaproteomic dataset ordination. Datasets from both approaches are ordered on a sample basis. The time-dependent aggregation into three clusters is shown in panels a and c. Panel b and d include information in respect to the experimental diets. Similarity analysis showed 40% similarity in the sequencing dataset (green clusters) and 60% similarity in the metaproteomics dataset (grey clusters)
Fig. 2Gut microbiota composition changes in a time point-dependent manner. Bar chart displays the relative abundance of the bacterial families as assessed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and label-free quantification metaproteomics. Both methods display a dynamic taxonomic composition among the adaptation periods. A higher taxonomic variability is visualized in the metaproteomic-based assessment when compared to the DNA-based approach
Fig. 3Microbiota members are involved in a variety of diverse biochemical pathways. The heat map shows the contribution of the top 10 most abundant bacterial families in the selected pathways in each adaptation period. Bacterial families exhibit specific involvement in the biochemical pathways, with a contribution that changes in dependence of the considered bacterial family and adaptation period
Fig. 4Microbial community exhibit a varying concern in selected carbohydrates pathways. Panel a Pentose and glucuronate interconversions, b glycerolipid metabolism, c pentose phosphate pathway and d galactose metabolism. Differently colored fillings of the pies indicate the bacterial families involved in the production of each of the identified proteins. Pie size is representative of the protein abundance, normalised on a time point basis. This normalisation highlights the portion of path of major concern for each of the three adaptation periods. The color code of the pie framing stands for red: zero, blue: MA and green: EQ. Colored squares, indicating the identified proteins, are used when pies contour does not allow for a clear distinction between the adaptation periods due to the reduced pie size. Red: zero; blue: MA; green: EQ; yellow: all periods; grey: zero/MA shared; orange: Zzro/EQ shared; purple: MA/EQ shared
Fig. 5Host proteome changes along with the remodelling of its gut metaproteome. Voronoi diagrams show the host proteome of zero (a), MA (b) and EQ (c) samples. Identified proteins are visualised as polygons, whose area reflect their relative abundance. Gene IDs are detailed for each polygon