Literature DB >> 28291605

Evaluation of acute and chronic pain outcomes after robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, or open anatomic pulmonary resection.

Sebastian T Kwon1, Lili Zhao2, Rishindra M Reddy1, Andrew C Chang1, Mark B Orringer1, Chad M Brummett3, Jules Lin4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) provides improved dexterity, the effect of RATS on pain compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or open lobectomy is poorly understood. This study evaluated acute and chronic pain following RATS, VATS, and open anatomic pulmonary resection.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 498 patients (502 procedures) who underwent RATS (74), VATS (227), and open (201) anatomic pulmonary resection including lobectomy and segmentectomy from 2010 to 2014 was performed to identify factors related to acute and chronic pain. Acute pain scores were analyzed over the first 9 postoperative days. Chronic pain was assessed using the validated PainDETECT survey.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in acute or chronic pain between RATS and VATS. There was a significant decrease in acute pain for patients with minimally invasive surgery (P = .0004). Chronic numbness was significantly higher after open resection (25.5% vs 11.6%; P = .0269) but with no difference in other symptoms of chronic pain. Despite no significant difference in pain scores, 69.2% of patients who received RATS felt the approach affected pain versus 44.2% VATS (P = .0330). On multivariable analysis, younger age (P < .0001), female gender (P = .0364), and baseline narcotic use (P = .0142) were associated with acute pain, whereas younger age (P = .0021) and major complications (P = .0003) were associated with chronic numbness in patients who received MIS.
CONCLUSIONS: Although minimally invasive approaches resulted in less acute pain and chronic numbness, there were no significant differences between RATS and VATS. In contrast, more RATS patients believed the approach affected their pain, suggesting a difference between reality and perception.
Copyright © 2017 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute pain; chronic pain; lobectomy; robotic surgery; thoracoscopy; thoracotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28291605     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  22 in total

1.  A prospective randomized trial of continuous paravertebral infusion versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Chang Young Lee; Kyoung Shik Narm; Jin Gu Lee; Hyo Chae Paik; Kyung Young Chung; Ha Young Shin; Ha Young Yeom; Dae Joon Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Robotic lobectomies: when and why?

Authors:  Sara Ricciardi; Giuseppe Cardillo; Carmelina Cristina Zirafa; Federico Davini; Franca Melfi
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-08-21

3.  Robotic lobectomy: revolution or evolution?

Authors:  Jules Lin
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Minimally invasive resection and reconstruction of the intrathoracic trachea and carina.

Authors:  Gregor J Kocher; Patrick Dorn
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Usefulness of robot-assisted surgery for lung cancer demonstrated from the patient's perspective.

Authors:  Takashi Suda
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Comparison of the perioperative outcomes between robotic-assisted thoracic surgery and video-assisted thoracic surgery in non-small cell lung cancer patients with different body mass index ranges.

Authors:  Chenghao Qu; Rongyang Li; Zheng Ma; Jingyi Han; Weiming Yue; Clemens Aigner; Monica Casiraghi; Hui Tian
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06

Review 7.  A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 2: systematic review of evidence regarding resection extent in generally healthy patients.

Authors:  Frank C Detterbeck; Vincent J Mase; Andrew X Li; Ulas Kumbasar; Brett C Bade; Henry S Park; Roy H Decker; David C Madoff; Gavitt A Woodard; Whitney S Brandt; Justin D Blasberg
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.005

8.  Efficacy and utility of robotic single-access bilateral nephrectomy (r-SABN) in end-stage renal disease patients.

Authors:  Gilbert Pan; Jeffrey Campsen; Robin D Kim; George Rofaiel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-08-09

9.  Postoperative morphine consumption and anaesthetic management of patients undergoing video-assisted or robotic-assisted lung resection: a prospective, propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Gary Duclos; Aude Charvet; Noémie Resseguier; Delphine Trousse; Xavier-Benoit D'Journo; Laurent Zieleskiewicz; Pascal-Alexandre Thomas; Marc Leone
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine Hydrochloride for Intercostal Nerve Blockade in Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery.

Authors:  Alessia Pedoto; Jovanka Noel; Bernard J Park; David Amar
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.