Literature DB >> 29078085

Parental preferences and allocations of investments in children's learning and health within families.

Alejandra Abufhele1, Jere Behrman2, David Bravo3.   

Abstract

Empirical evidence suggests that parental preferences may be important in determining investment allocations among their children. However, there is mixed or no evidence on a number of important related questions. Do parents invest more in better-endowed children, thus reinforcing differentials among their children? Or do they invest more in less-endowed children to compensate for their smaller endowments and reduce inequalities among their children? Does higher maternal education affect the preferences underlying parental decisions in investing among their children? What difference might such intrafamilial investments among children make? And what is the nature of these considerations in the very different context of developing countries? This paper gives new empirical evidence related to these questions. We examine how parental investments affecting child education and health respond to initial endowment differences between twins within families, as represented by birth weight differences, and how parental preference tradeoffs and therefore parental investment strategies vary between families with different maternal education. Using the separable earnings-transfers model (Behrman et al., 1982), we first illustrate that preference differences may make a considerable difference in the ratios of health and learning differentials between siblings - up to 30% in the simulations that we provide. Using a sample of 2000 twins, collected in the 2012 wave of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey for Chile, we find that preferences are not at the extreme of pure compensatory investments to offset endowment inequalities among siblings nor at the extreme of pure reinforcement to favor the better-endowed child with no concern about inequality. Instead, they are neutral, so that parental investments do not change the inequality among children due to endowment differentials. We also find that there are not significant preference differences between families with low- and high-educated mothers. Our estimates are consistent with previous empirical evidence that finds that parents do not invest differentially within twins.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth weight; Body mass index; Child development; Chile; Cognitive and non-cognitive development; Height; Parental preferences and within-family investments; Weight

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29078085      PMCID: PMC5705013          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  8 in total

1.  Nutrition, health, birth order and seasonality: intrahousehold allocation among children in rural India.

Authors:  J R Behrman
Journal:  J Dev Econ       Date:  1988-02

2.  Endowments and parental investments in infancy and early childhood.

Authors:  Ashlesha Datar; M Rebecca Kilburn; David S Loughran
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2010-02

3.  Compensation or Reinforcement? The Stratification of Parental Responses to Children's Early Ability.

Authors:  Michael Grätz; Florencia Torche
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2016-12

4.  Is biology destiny? Birth weight and differential parental treatment.

Authors:  Amy Hsin
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2012-11

5.  Intrahousehold resource allocation: do parents reduce or reinforce child ability gaps?

Authors:  Paul Frijters; David W Johnston; Manisha Shah; Michael A Shields
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2013-12

6.  Killing Me Softly: The Fetal Origins Hypothesis.

Authors:  Douglas Almond; Janet Currie
Journal:  J Econ Perspect       Date:  2011

7.  Adult consequences of growth failure in early childhood.

Authors:  John Hoddinott; Jere R Behrman; John A Maluccio; Paul Melgar; Agnes R Quisumbing; Manuel Ramirez-Zea; Aryeh D Stein; Kathryn M Yount; Reynaldo Martorell
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 8.  Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences for adult health and human capital.

Authors:  Cesar G Victora; Linda Adair; Caroline Fall; Pedro C Hallal; Reynaldo Martorell; Linda Richter; Harshpal Singh Sachdev
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 79.321

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Gene-environment Interactions and School Tracking during Secondary Education: Evidence from the U.S.

Authors:  Fumiya Uchikoshi; Dalton Conley
Journal:  Res Soc Stratif Mobil       Date:  2021-07-16

2.  The effects of a nutrient supplementation intervention in Ghana on parents' investments in their children.

Authors:  Katherine P Adams; Seth Adu-Afarwuah; Helena Bentil; Brietta M Oaks; Rebecca R Young; Stephen A Vosti; Kathryn G Dewey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.