Literature DB >> 29076353

Manufacturing Process Changes and Reduced Skin Irritations of an Adhesive Patch Used for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices.

Vitaliy Gisin1, Anna Chan1, John B Welsh1.   

Abstract

Adhesives used for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices can cause skin irritations, which sometimes lead to abandonment of the therapy. A previous sensor manufacturing process involved two separate adhesives-one applied to the skin-facing surface of the fabric patch, and a second, ethyl cyanoacrylate-based adhesive, which secured the plastic transmitter housing to the superficial side of the patch. Our current process for attaching the transmitter housing to the fabric patch uses heatstaking, wherein the housing is heated and pressed against the patch with a specialized assembly apparatus. Heatstaking simplifies the sensor assembly process and obviates the need for the second adhesive, which may lead to lower risk of skin irritation(s) in some patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acrylate; adhesives; contact allergy; contact dermatitis; continuous glucose monitoring; polymerized acrylates

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29076353      PMCID: PMC6154234          DOI: 10.1177/1932296817738076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  10 in total

1.  Sensitization to cyanoacrylates caused by prolonged exposure to a glucose sensor set in a diabetic child.

Authors:  Jakob F Schwensen; Ulrik F Friis; Claus Zachariae; Jeanne D Johansen
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  A Diabetic's Allergy: Ethyl Cyanoacrylate in Glucose Sensor Adhesive.

Authors:  Kelly A Aschenbeck; Sara A Hylwa
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 4.845

3.  Eyelid allergic contact dermatitis caused by ethyl cyanoacrylate-containing eyelash adhesive.

Authors:  Kapil Bhargava; Jonathan M White; Ian R White
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Allergic contact dermatitis caused by isobornyl acrylate in Freestyle® Libre, a newly introduced glucose sensor.

Authors:  Anne Herman; Olivier Aerts; Marie Baeck; Magnus Bruze; Christophe De Block; An Goossens; Nils Hamnerius; Sara Huygens; Dominique Maiter; Dominique Tennstedt; Bernard Vandeleene; Martin Mowitz
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Skin and adhesive issues with continuous glucose monitors: a sticky situation.

Authors:  Kimberly Englert; Katrina Ruedy; Julie Coffey; Kimberly Caswell; Amy Steffen; Lucy Levandoski
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-04-24

6.  Adhesives Used for Diabetes Medical Devices: A Neglected Risk With Serious Consequences?

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Stefanie Kamann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-01

7.  Effectiveness of sensor-augmented insulin-pump therapy in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Richard M Bergenstal; William V Tamborlane; Andrew Ahmann; John B Buse; George Dailey; Stephen N Davis; Carol Joyce; Tim Peoples; Bruce A Perkins; John B Welsh; Steven M Willi; Michael A Wood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Allergic contact dermatitis to 2-octyl cyanoacrylate.

Authors:  Casey Bowen; Jeff Bidinger; Chad Hivnor; Aaron Hoover; Jeffrey S Henning
Journal:  Cutis       Date:  2014-10

9.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Adherence in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes: Associations With Biomedical and Psychosocial Variables.

Authors:  Elisa Giani; Rebecca Snelgrove; Lisa K Volkening; Lori M Laffel
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-01

10.  Routine use of continuous glucose monitoring in 10 501 people with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  T Battelino; S Liabat; H J Veeze; J Castañeda; A Arrieta; O Cohen
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.359

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Cutaneous Complications With Continuous or Flash Glucose Monitoring Use: Systematic Review of Trials and Observational Studies.

Authors:  Nurul A Mohd Asarani; Andrew N Reynolds; Sara E Boucher; Martin de Bock; Benjamin J Wheeler
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-08-27

Review 2.  [Contact allergy due to insulin pumps and glucose sensor systems].

Authors:  N Wagner; S Kamann; E Oppel
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Minimizing Adverse Skin Reactions to Wearable Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors in Patients With Diabetes.

Authors:  Alexander Seibold
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-01-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.