| Literature DB >> 29074954 |
Cecilia Marini1,2,3, Silvia Bruno4, Francesco Fiz5,6, Cristina Campi7, Roberta Piva5, Giovanna Cutrona8, Serena Matis8, Alberto Nieri5, Maurizio Miglino9, Adalberto Ibatici10, Anna Maria Orengo11, Anna Maria Massone7, Carlo Emanuele Neumaier12, Daniela de Totero13, Paolo Giannoni14, Matteo Bauckneht5, Michele Pennone11, Claudya Tenca4, Elena Gugiatti4, Alessandro Bellini5, Anna Borra5, Elisabetta Tedone10, Hülya Efetürk11,5, Francesca Rosa12, Laura Emionite15, Michele Cilli15, Davide Bagnara4,16, Valerio Brucato17, Paolo Bruzzi18, Michele Piana7,19, Franco Fais4,8, Gianmario Sambuceti11,5.
Abstract
Skeletal erosion has been found to represent an independent prognostic indicator in patients with advanced stages of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Whether this phenomenon also occurs in early CLL phases and its underlying mechanisms have yet to be fully elucidated. In this study, we prospectively enrolled 36 consecutive treatment-naïve patients to analyse skeletal structure and bone marrow distribution using a computational approach to PET/CT images. This evaluation was combined with the analysis of RANK/RANKL loop activation in the leukemic clone, given recent reports on its role in CLL progression. Bone erosion was particularly evident in long bone shafts, progressively increased from Binet stage A to Binet stage C, and was correlated with both local expansion of metabolically active bone marrow documented by FDG uptake and with the number of RANKL + cells present in the circulating blood. In immune-deficient NOD/Shi-scid, γcnull (NSG) mice, administration of CLL cells caused an appreciable compact bone erosion that was prevented by Denosumab. CLL cell proliferation in vitro correlated with RANK expression and was impaired by Denosumab-mediated disruption of the RANK/RANKL loop. This study suggests an interaction between CLL cells and stromal elements able to simultaneously impair bone structure and increase proliferating potential of leukemic clone.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29074954 PMCID: PMC5658396 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12761-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinical Characteristics of the Pateints’ Population.
| Group | Number | Gender F/M | AGE (Years) | HEIGHT (cm) | WEIGHT (Kg) | Disease Duration (Months) | Hb (g/L) | WBC (10E9/L) | PLT (10E9/L) | LYMPHOCYTES (RELATIVE %) | %CLONE | IgHV mutation in >2% cells | CD38% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | 36 | 11/25 | 70 ± 12 | 168 ± 8 | 71 ± 9 | 34 ± 39 | 126 ± 22 | 62,58 ± 55,6 | 180 ± 56,5 | 73 ± 20,4 | 63,24 ± 24,9 | 22 (61%) | 34 ± 22 |
| Binet A | 16 | 6/10 | 71 ± 13 | 166 ± 7 | 66 ± 7 | 35 ± 33 | 136,2 ± 14,9 | 43,7 ± 39 | 193,3 ± 42,8 | 68,4 ± 19,4 | 55,67 ± 21 | 12 (75%) | 30 ± 18 |
| Binet B | 12 | 4/8 | 67 ± 12 | 166 ± 9 | 77 ± 9 | 39 ± 46 | 129,6 ± 14 | 61,1 ± 46,2 | 77,2 ± 38,9 | 77,2 ± 14,7 | 61 ± 30 | 7 (58%) | 38 ± 24 |
| Binet C | 8 | 1/7 | 73 ± 9 | 172 ± 7 | 72 ± 10 | 23 ± 43 | 105,5 ± 26,5 | 102,4 ± 78,1 | 154 ± 86,5 | 75,9 ± 28,4 | 81,7 ± 12 | 3 (37%) | 36 ± 25 |
Figure 1%IBV/SV ratio in control subjects (white) overall CLL patients (black). This latter group is subdivided according to Binet A (pale grey), B (grey) and C (dark grey). CLL was associated with a significant bone erosion (**p < 0.01 vs controls) that was independent from Binet stage when the whole skeleton was analyzed (panel A), while it was related to clinical disease stage in the appendicular districts (panel B). Panel C shows whole body RBM glucose consumption in CLL patients and control subjects. In appendicular bones (Panel D), this same pattern was associated with a significant progressive trend in N-SUV (p < 0.05) between the different Binet stages and became higher than control value in Binet C patients (*p < 0.05). Panels E-F-G: Examples of RBM distributions in the three Binet stages, respectively. The expansion of RBM in proximal femur shafts is evident only in Binet C patient (red arrows).
Figure 2Panels A–C report the detection of the presence of leukemic cells engrafted in the spleen (A), BM (B) and peripheral blood (PBMC, C) as h-CD45/CD19/CD5-triple positive cells by flow cytometry in a representative mouse injected intravenously with the PBMC cells from a CLL patient. Panels D and E show immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis in paraffin embedded tissue slice sections from the same spleen. Tissue section is analysed for the presence of the typical neoplastic foci positive for CD20 B cell marker (D) surrounded by autologous CD3+ T cells (E) (magnification 40x upper panels and 400x lower panels).
Figure 3Panel A displays hematoxylin-eosin eosin staining of bone and bone marrow biopsy in a sham mouse with magnification related to the green insert. Panel B displays the same analysis in an untreated xenograft model (relative to the red insert): a high number of multinucleated large cells similar to osteoclasts are evident (white and red arrows). Panel C displays the absence of this finding in the bone marrow of a mouse subjected to Denosumab treatment for three weeks (blue insert). Panel D reports the original images of the right femur obtained by high resolution CT in a control model and in a CLL mouse, respectively. The longitudinal sections are represented in the middle and connected with the corresponding short axis slices in the original CT scans obtained in living animal. The enlargement in intrabone section is apparent. Alongside these images, Panel E displays a 3D representation of high resolution CT obtained ex vivo from the same femur. These images document a relative loss in trabecular structure as well as an irregular border of compact bone. This pattern is confirmed in the original 2D sections of the same microCT scan (panel F) in which compact bone erosion of femur shaft is detailed (bottom inserts).
Figure 4Panel A reports column chart of % IBV/SV ratio in control mice, CLL untreated mice (CLL no treatment) and CLL Denosumab ones. White columns indicate bone erosion at CT2 (four weeks after CLL cells administration) while grey columns report the same variable at CT3. AT CT2, CLL was associated with a significant femur erosion (*p < 0.01 vs controls). This difference persisted in untreated mice at CT3 (three weeks later). By contrast, Denosumab induced a significant reduction in IBV/SV to values that were lower with respect to untreated mice and similar to ones of control group. Panel B, displays the individual response to treatment (blue lines) or placebo (red lines) from CT2 to CT3. Denosumab caused a significant reduction of IBV/SV. Panel C summarizes the effect of in vivo denosumab treatment on human neoplastic B-cells (h CD45/CD5/CD19- positive cells). Percentage of CLL cells was significantly lower in denosumab treated mice compared to controls treated with saline (CTR) in BM and spleen. The mean and SEM of 19 mice injected with CLL cells from two different cases are shown (Mann-Whitney test). Panel D displays the direct correlation between %RANK+ B cells (X axis) in peripheral blood of each patient and actively proliferating cells indexed by HDF (Y axis). Panel E: displays the in vitro reduction in HDF induced by Denosumab. Panel F: displays the direct relationship between %RANK+ cells (X axis) and Denosumab effect on HDF.
Figure 5In panel A, cells with features of osteoclasts, as determined by TRAP positivity and ≥3 nuclei/cell (red arrows), were observed after co-cultures of monocytes with autologous CLL B cells for 25 days, without any monocytes pre-activation. Details at high magnification are displayed in the green box. In panel B, monocytes sampled from a healthy donor differentiated toward osteoclastic phenotype after activation with RANKL and MCSF. In panel C, number and the size of osteoclasts, from healthy monocytes pre-activated with MCSF + RANKL, appeared enhanced when conditioned media (CM) of CLL B cells cultures were added. Images are relative to experiments performed with CM from 3 representative CLL cases. In Panel D, histograms depict the average (±SD) percentage of tri-nucleated TRAP+ cells counted per field in all different experimental conditions: control CD14+ purified monocyte culture; +BE117, +FA35, +FW16, +MG37, +VG34: control monocytes cultured with the addition of the corresponding CM of CLL B cells. Nominal p values are indicated; n.s.: not significant. A minimum of total 3000 cells was counted for each culture condition and experiment.
Prediction of appendicular bone erosion: uni- and multivariate analysis.
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non standardized coefficient | Standardized coefficient | Non standardized coefficient | Standardized coefficient | |||||||
| B | Standard error | Beta | t | p | B | Standard error | Beta | t | p | |
| RANK+ cell number | 1.709 × 10-7 | 0.000 | 0.104 | 0.6 | 0.523 | — | — | — | — | — |
| RANK+-RANKL+ cell number | 8.806 × 10−7 | 0.000 | 0.192 | 1.124 | 0.269 | — | — | — | — | — |
| % cells in S + G2M cycle phase | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.264 | 1.398 | 0.174 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Hemoglobin | −0.041 | 0.026 | −0.255 | −1.538 | 0.133 | — | — | — | — | — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| — | — | — | — | — |
| CD19+ cells | 1.464 × 10−6 | 0.000 | 0.18 | 1.068 | 0.293 | — | — | — | — | — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| — | — | — | — | — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7.571 × 10−7 | 0.000 | 0.258 | 1.512 | 0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prediction of FDG uptake in active bone marrow: uni- and multivariate analysis.
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non standardized coefficient | Standardized coefficient | Non standardized coefficient | Standardized coefficient | |||||||
| B | Standard error | Beta | t | p | B | Standard error | Beta | t | p | |
| RANK+ cell number | 7.37 × 10−7 | 0 | 0.052 | 0.299 | 0.767 | — | — | — | — | — |
| RANK+-RANKL+ cell number | 5.29 × 10−6 | 0 | 0.134 | 0.777 | 0.443 | — | — | — | — | — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| — | — | — | — | — |
| Hemoglobin | −0.003 | 0.002 | −0.227 | 1.257 | 0.184 | — | — | — | — | — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| — | — | — | — | — |
| CD19+ cells | 1.431 × 10−6 | 0 | 0.204 | 1.215 | 0.233 | — | — | — | — | — |
| % CD38+ cells | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.205 | 1.223 | 0.23 | — | — | — | — | — |
| IL8 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.067 | 0.366 | 0.717 | — | — | — | — | — |
| RANKL+ cell number | 5.32 × 10−6 | 0 | 0.211 | 1.223 | 0.23 | — | — | — | — | — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|