Literature DB >> 29074734

The impact of out-of-hospital models of care on paediatric emergency department presentations.

Russell M Viner1,2, Frances Blackburn1, Francesca White1, Randy Mannie3, Tracy Parr1, Sara Nelson1, Claire Lemer4, Anna Riddell5, Mando Watson6, Francesca Cleugh6, Michelle Heys2, Dougal S Hargreaves1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the potential impact of enhanced primary care and new out-of-hospital models (OOHMs) on emergency department (ED) presentations by children and young people (CYP).
DESIGN: Observational study. PATIENTS &
SETTING: Data collected prospectively on 3020 CYP 0-17.9 years from 6 London EDs during 14 days by 25 supernumerary clinicians. CYP with transient acute illness, exacerbation of long-term condition (LTC), complex LTC/disability and injury/trauma were considered manageable within OOHM. OOHMs assessed included nurse-led services, multispecialty community provider (MCP), primary and acute care system (PACS) plus current and enhanced primary care. MEASURES: Diagnosis, severity; record of investigations, management and outcome that occurred; objective assessment of clinical need and potential alternative management options/destinations.
RESULTS: Of the patients 95.6% had diagnoses appropriate for OOHM. Most presentations required assessment by a clinician with skills in assessing illness (39.6%) or injuries (30.9%). One thousand two hundred and ninety-one (42.75%) required no investigations and 1007 (33.3%) were provided only with reassurance. Of the presentations 42.2% were judged to have been totally avoidable if the family had had better health education.Of the patients 26.1% were judged appropriate for current primary care (community pharmacy or general practice) with 31.5% appropriate for the combination of enhanced general practice and community pharmacy. Proportions suitable for new models were 14.1% for the nurse-led acute illness team, MCP 25.7%, GP federation CYP service 44.6%, comprehensive walk-in centre for CYP 64.3% and 75.5% for a PACS.
CONCLUSIONS: High proportions of ED presentations by CYP could potentially be managed in new OOHMs or by enhancement of existing primary care. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; health service; health services research; integrated care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29074734     DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  4 in total

1.  Paediatric contacts with the UK out-of-hours primary care service and contact outcomes: a regional service evaluation.

Authors:  George Edwards; Rachel Brettell; Chris Bird; Helen Hunt; Dan Lasserson; Gail Hayward
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.497

2.  Children and Young People's Health Partnership (CYPHP) Evelina London model of care: protocol for an opportunistic cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) to assess child health outcomes, healthcare quality and health service use.

Authors:  James Joseph Newham; Julia Forman; Michelle Heys; Simon Cousens; Claire Lemer; Mohamed Elsherbiny; Rose-Marie Satherley; Raghu Lingam; Ingrid Wolfe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  The Children and Young People's Health Partnership Evelina London Model of Care: process evaluation protocol.

Authors:  Rose-Marie Satherley; Judith Green; Nick Sevdalis; James Joseph Newham; Mohamed Elsherbiny; Julia Forman; Ingrid Wolfe; Raghu Lingam
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Non-urgent emergency department attendances in children: a retrospective observational analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca M Simpson; Colin O'Keeffe; Richard M Jacques; Tony Stone; Abu Hassan; Suzanne M Mason
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 2.740

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.