Literature DB >> 29072793

Cytoarchitectonically-driven MRI atlas of nonhuman primate hippocampus: Preservation of subfield volumes in aging.

Colin T Kyle1, Jared Stokes2, Jeffrey Bennett3, Jeri Meltzer4, Michele R Permenter4, Julie A Vogt4, Arne Ekstrom2,5, Carol A Barnes1,6,7.   

Abstract

Identification of primate hippocampal subfields in vivo using structural MRI imaging relies on variable anatomical guidelines, signal intensity differences, and heuristics to differentiate between regions (Yushkevich et al., 2015a). Thus, a clear anatomically-driven basis for subfield demarcation is lacking. Recent work, however, has begun to develop methods to use ex vivo histology or ex vivo MRI (Adler et al., 2014; Iglesias et al., 2015) that have the potential to inform subfield demarcations of in vivo images. For optimal results, however, ex vivo and in vivo images should ideally be matched within the same healthy brains, with the goal to develop a neuroanatomically-driven basis for in vivo structural MRI images. Here, we address this issue in young and aging rhesus macaques (young n = 5 and old n = 5) using ex vivo Nissl-stained sections in which we identified the dentate gyrus, CA3, CA2, CA1, subiculum, presubiculum, and parasubiculum guided by morphological cell properties (30 μm thick sections spaced at 240 μm intervals and imaged at 161 nm/pixel). The histologically identified boundaries were merged with in vivo structural MRIs (0.625 × 0.625 × 1 mm) from the same subjects via iterative rigid and diffeomorphic registration resulting in probabilistic atlases of young and old rhesus macaques. Our results indicate stability in hippocampal subfield volumes over an age range of 13 to 32 years, consistent with previous results showing preserved whole hippocampal volume in aged macaques (Shamy et al., 2006). Together, our methods provide a novel approach for identifying hippocampal subfields in non-human primates and a potential 'ground truth' for more accurate identification of hippocampal subfield boundaries on in vivo MRIs. This could, in turn, have applications in humans where accurately identifying hippocampal subfields in vivo is a critical research goal.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; aging; hippocampus; histology; in vivo; postmortem; reconstruction; registration; subfields

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29072793      PMCID: PMC5920786          DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  46 in total

1.  Intracellular recording and labeling of mossy cells and proximal CA3 pyramidal cells in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  P S Buckmaster; D G Amaral
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2001-02-05       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 2.  The dentate gyrus: fundamental neuroanatomical organization (dentate gyrus for dummies).

Authors:  David G Amaral; Helen E Scharfman; Pierre Lavenex
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 3.  Comparative anatomy of the prosubiculum, subiculum, presubiculum, postsubiculum, and parasubiculum in human, monkey, and rodent.

Authors:  Song-Lin Ding
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Borders, extent, and topography of human perirhinal cortex as revealed using multiple modern neuroanatomical and pathological markers.

Authors:  Song-Lin Ding; Gary W Van Hoesen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Registration of in-vivo to ex-vivo MRI of surgically resected specimens: a pipeline for histology to in-vivo registration.

Authors:  Maged Goubran; Sandrine de Ribaupierre; Robert R Hammond; Catherine Currie; Jorge G Burneo; Andrew G Parrent; Terry M Peters; Ali R Khan
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Connections of the hippocampal formation in humans: I. The mossy fiber pathway.

Authors:  C Lim; H W Blume; J R Madsen; C B Saper
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Age-related changes in the mesial temporal lobe: the parahippocampal white matter region.

Authors:  Travis R Stoub; Carol A Barnes; Raj C Shah; Glenn T Stebbins; Carolyn Ferrari; Leyla deToledo-Morrell
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Advances in high-resolution imaging and computational unfolding of the human hippocampus.

Authors:  Arne D Ekstrom; Adam J Bazih; Nanthia A Suthana; Ramsey Al-Hakim; Kenji Ogura; Michael Zeineh; Alison C Burggren; Susan Y Bookheimer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Changes in pattern completion--a key mechanism to explain age-related recognition memory deficits?

Authors:  Paula Vieweg; Matthias Stangl; Lorelei R Howard; Thomas Wolbers
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Memory impairment in aged primates is associated with region-specific network dysfunction.

Authors:  A Thomé; D T Gray; C A Erickson; P Lipa; C A Barnes
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 15.992

View more
  3 in total

1.  Narrativity and Referential Activity Predict Episodic Memory Strength in Autobiographical Memories.

Authors:  Kristin L Nelson; Sean M Murphy; Wilma Bucci
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2021-01-24

2.  Sharing voxelwise neuroimaging results from rhesus monkeys and other species with Neurovault.

Authors:  Andrew S Fox; Daniel Holley; Peter Christiaan Klink; Spencer A Arbuckle; Carol A Barnes; Jörn Diedrichsen; Sze Chai Kwok; Colin Kyle; J Andrew Pruszynski; Jakob Seidlitz; XuFeng Zhou; Russell A Poldrack; Krzysztof J Gorgolewski
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Behavioral Impact of Long-Term Chronic Implantation of Neural Recording Devices in the Rhesus Macaque.

Authors:  Colin T Kyle; Michele R Permenter; Julie A Vogt; Peter R Rapp; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2018-07-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.