Synthesis, Cytotoxicity and Molecular Docking Studies of the 9-Substituted 5-Styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline Derivatives.

In this paper, we describe the synthesis of the 5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines substituted at the 9-position with a 4-fluorophenyl ring directly or via a conjugated π-spacer (C=C or C≡C bond) based on the 6-bromo-4-chloro-2-styrylquinazoline scaffold. The structures of the synthesized compounds were characterized based on a combination of ¹H-NMR, 13C-NMR, IR and high resolution mass spectral data as well as microanalyses. The tetrazoloquinazolines were evaluated for potential in vitro cytotoxicity against the human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) and cervical cancer (HeLa) cells. The anti-proliferative assays demonstrated that the 9-bromo-5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline 3a and 9-bromo-5-(4-fluorostyryl)tetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline 3b exhibit significant cytotoxicity against both cell lines. A carbon-based substituent at the 9-position resulted in complete loss of cytotoxicity against both cell lines except for the 5,9-bis((E)-4-fluorostyryl)tetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline 4e, which was found to exhibit comparable cytotoxicity to that of Melphalan (IC50 = 61 μM) against the MCF-7 cell line with IC50 value of 62 μM. Molecular docking against tubulin (PDB:1TUB) showed that compounds 3a, 3b and 4e bind to the tubulin heterodimer. Binding involves hydrogen bonding for 3a and 3b and halogen interactions for 4e.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen-based heterocycles such as quinazolines and tetrazoles have earned great interest in medicinal chemistry as anticancer agents [1,2]. Quinazoline derivatives, for example, have been found to inhibit the growth of various cancers including cell carcinoma, bladder, lung, colon, prostate and breast tumour cells [1]. These compounds are known to produce their anticancer activity through inhibition of enzymes such as epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TS), dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), folate thymidylate synthase, tyrosine kinase, aldose reductase, cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase and DNA repairing enzymes [1]. Tetrazole and its derivatives, on the other hand, exhibit a wide variety of biological properties including anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antifungal, anti-tubercolous, antiviral, antinociceptive, hypoglycaemic, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, and anticancer activities [3,4]. Two series of 1,5-diaryl substituted 1,2,3,4-tetrazoles (A) and (B) (Figure 1) were synthesized and identified as potent antiproliferative agents and novel tubulin polymerization inhibitors that act at the colchicine site [2]. Colchicine binds tubulin and prevents the formation of microtubules while other anticancer agents can stabilise the tubulin structure, therefore preventing microtubule disassembly [5]. Any disruption in the dynamic nature of microtubule formation and disassociation induces apoptosis [5]. Incorporation of the tetrazole moiety onto the quinazoline framework to comprise the tetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines has been found to yield derivatives with anti-allergic, bactericide, bronchodilator, anti-ulcer, anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antihypertensive properties [6].

Figure 1

Isomeric 1,5-diaryl substituted 1,2,3,4-tetrazoles (A) and (B) with antiproliferative and tubulin polymerization inhibition properties.

In a previous study from our group, we synthesized series of the 6-bromo- and 6-aryl-2-styrylquinazolin-4(3H)-ones and evaluated them for antin class="Disease">cancer and antimicrobial properties [7]. In our quest to optimize this class of potential anti-proliferative agents, we decided to modify the 2-styrylquinazolin-4(3H)-one framework by (i) annulating a tetrazolo moiety onto the c-face and (ii) by varying substituents at the C-6 position to afford novel 5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline derivatives. The main purpose was to prepare the 5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines substituted at the 9 position with a bromine or carbon-based (aryl/styryl/arylethynyl) substituent and to evaluate them for potential anti-proliferative properties. Recourse to the literature revealed three main synthetic approaches towards the tetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines, which involve either the cyclisation of the 4-hydrazinoquinazolines with nitric acid or nucleophilic aromatic substitution of the 4-chloroquinazolines with sodium azide and subsequent in situ heteroannulation, as well as the cyclization of 5-(2′-aminophenyl)-1H-tetrazoles with acetic anhydride [6]. We envisioned that aromatization of the 2-styrylquinazolin-4(3H)-ones followed by nucleophilic aromatic substitution-heteroannulation of the intermediate 4-chloro-2-styrylquinazolines with sodium azide would afford the corresponding 5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines. In our view, the presence of a bromine atom in the incipient 9-bromo-5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines would facilitate further transformation via palladium catalysed Suzuki-Miyaura or Sonogashira cross-coupling with arylboronic acids or terminal alkynes, respectively. The potential of these 9-substituted 5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines to bind tubulin and affect changes to the dynamic nature of assembly or disassembly is explained theoretically through molecular docking (in silico) studies.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

2.1.1. Synthesis of 9-Bromo-5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines 3a–c

The 6-bromo-4-chloro-2-styrylquinazolines 2a–c used as substrates in this investigation were prepared by chlorination-dehydration of the corresponding n class="Chemical">(E)-6-bromo-2-styrylquinazolin-4(3H)-ones 1a–c [7] with phosphoryl chloride in the presence of triethyl amine under reflux (Scheme 1). The structure of compounds 2a–c was assigned based on their NMR (1H and 13C in DMSO-d6), IR and HR-MS data. The 1H-NMR spectra of the styrylquinazolines 2a–c (see supplementary material S1) reveal the presence of two doublets in the aromatic region with coupling constant values J = 16.0 Hz, which indicates that the double bond exists in E-geometry in agreement with the literature assignment for the analogous compounds [8,9]. The 4-chloroquinazolines 2a–c were, in turn, subjected to sodium azide in DMF at 45 °C and we isolated after 4 h the corresponding 5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines 3a–c by aqueous work-up and recrystallization (Scheme 1). Previous studies on the 5-alkyl and 5-aryl substituted tetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines have revealed that these compounds exist predominantly in the tetrazole form in both the solid state and solution phase [10]. However, the presence of an electron-withdrawing substituent such as a halogen atom in position 8 or 10 was found to result in spontaneous cleavage of the pyrimidine ring of the formed tetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline into the corresponding N-3/5-halogeno-2-(1H-tetrazolo-5-yl)phenyl)formamides [11]. The possibility of cleavage of the pyrimidine ring was ruled out by the absence of signal for NH of the tetrazole in the 1H-NMR spectra of compounds 3a–c (see supplementary material S1), which typically resonates in the region δH 16.60–16.90 ppm [11]. The 13C-NMR spectra of these products revealed significant downfield shift of signals corresponding to C-6a, C-1a and C-5 to δ 148.7, 143.6 and 137.1 ppm confirming the incorporation of the tetrazolo moiety in analogy with the literature precedent for the 5-unsubstituted tetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline derivatives [6]. Moreover, IR spectral analysis of 3a–c in the solid state showed the absence of the azide group vibration at about νmax 2100 cm−1, which indicates that the compounds exist as the tetrazole form.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of 2a–c and subsequent reaction with sodium azide to afford 3a–c. Reagents & conditions: (i) POCl3, Et3N, reflux, 2 h; (ii) NaN3, THF, 45 °C, 4 h.

A fluorophenyl group on heterocycles has previously been found to enhance biological activity and the lipophilicity of the molecule [8] due to the non-polarizability of the n class="Gene">Csp2-F bond [12]. With the 9-bromo-5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines 3a–c in hand, we decided to attach a 4-fluorophenyl group at the 9-position directly or through a π-spacer (C=C or C≡C bond) to correlate the effect of conjugation to cytotoxic activity in the resultant 9-(4-fluorophenyl/4-fluorostyryl or 4-fluoroethynyl)–substituted 2-styryltetrazoloquinazolines. The transformation was achieved via palladium catalysed Suzuki-Miyaura and Sonogashira cross-coupling reactions as described below.

2.1.2. Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling in the Synthesis of 4a–f

The Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling of 3a–c with either 4-fluorophenyl- or n class="Chemical">4-fluorostyrylboronic acid (1.2 equiv.) in the presence of dichlorobis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) (PdCl2(PPh3)2) as the source of active Pd(0) species and K2CO3 (aq) as a base in DMF under reflux afforded the corresponding 9-(4-fluorophenyl/4-fluorostyryl)–substituted 5-tetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines 4a–f (Table 1, Scheme 2). The latter were also prepared directly from 2a–c via one-pot successive nucleophilic aromatic substitution and heteroannulation with sodium azide under the same reaction conditions described in Scheme 1, followed by the Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling with 4-fluorophenylboronic or 4-fluorostyrylboronic acid in the presence of PdCl2(PPh3)2 and K2CO3 (aq) at 70 °C under argon. The 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra of compounds 4a–f (see supplementary material S1) are characterized by the presence of an increased number of proton and carbon signals in the aromatic region thus confirming substitution of the bromine atom. The presence of fluorinated aryl groups is further confirmed by the presence of the two sets of intense triplets corresponding to the 4-fluorophenyl group and also the olefinic protons for the 9-(4-fluorostyryl) derivatives 4d–f. The molecular ion region of the mass spectra of these compounds, on the other hand, revealed the absence of the M+ and M+2 peaks in the ratio 1:1 typical for compounds containing the 79Br and 81Br isotopes, thus confirming their 9-carbosubstituted 5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline nature.

Table 1

Percentage yields of 4a–f.

Compound	Ar1	Ar2	%Yield from 3	%Yield from 2
4a	C6H5-	4-FC6H4-	53	65
4b	4-FC6H4-	4-FC6H4-	51	60
4c	4-ClC6H4-	4-FC6H4-	50	63
4d	C6H5-	4-FC6H4CH=CH-	47	57
4e	4-FC6H4-	4-FC6H4CH=CH-	58	62
4f	4-ClC6H4-	4-FC6H4CH=CH-	55	68

Scheme 2

Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling of 3a–c. Reagents & conditions: (i) ArB(OH)2, PdCl2(PPh3)2, K2CO3, DMF, 100 °C, 3 h.

2.1.3. Sonogashira Cross-Coupling of 2a–c and 3a–c

The 9-bromo-5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines 3a–c were also subjected to the Sonogashira cross-coupling with n class="Chemical">4-fluorophenylacetylene (1.5 equiv.) as coupling partner in the presence of PdCl2(PPh3)2–CuI catalyst mixture and K2CO3 as a base at 70 °C for 4 h under argon atmosphere (Table 2, Scheme 3). We isolated by column chromatography on silica gel the corresponding 9-alkynylated styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines 5a–c. Dechloroamination-cyclization of compounds 2a–c with sodium azide under the same conditions described for the synthesis of 3a–c followed by the Sonogashira cross-coupling of the incipient styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline with 4-fluorophenylacetylene (1.5 equiv.) in the presence of PdCl2(PPh3)2 and K2CO3 (aq) at 70 °C for 4 h also afforded compounds 5a–d in a single-pot operation. 1H-NMR spectroscopy revealed the presence of two sets of intense symmetrical triplets each integrating for two protons typical of a 4-fluorophenyl group (see supplementary material S1). The presence of the alkynyl group was confirmed by the presence of carbon signals in the region δ 88.0–92.0 ppm of their 13C-NMR spectra and the IR absorption bands in the region νmax 2202–2261 cm−1. Moreover, the accurate calculated m/z values for compounds 5a–c, represent in each case a closest fit consistent with the incorporation of a 4-fluorophenylethynyl moiety.

Table 2

Percentage yields of 5a–c.

Compound	Ar	%Yield from 3	%Yield from 2
5a	C6H5-	50	58
5b	4-FC6H4-	48	54
5c	4-ClC6H4-	52	55

Scheme 3

Sonogashira cross-coupling of 3a–c. Reagents & conditions: (i) 4-FC6H4C≡CH, PdCl2(PPh3)2, CuI, Cs2CO3, DMF, 90 °C, 4 h.

As part of our ongoing research program on polynuclear quinazoline derivatives, which may serve as leads for the design of antitumor agents, we decided to evaluate the n class="Chemical">5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines 3–5 for potential anti-proliferative properties as described below.

2.2. Biological Evaluation

2.2.1. In Vitro Anti-Proliferative Activity of the 5-Styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines 3–5

The 5-styryltetrazoloquinazolines 3a–c, 4a–f and 5a–c were evaluated for growth inhibitory activity against the n class="Species">human breast cancer (MCF-7) and the human cervical cancer (HeLa) cell lines using the well-established 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide based colorimetric cell viability (MTT) assay with Melphalan, a well-known chemotherapeutic compound used as the reference drug. The cytotoxic activities of the tested compounds were expressed as IC50 values (the dose that reduces survival to 50%) in μM using Melphalan as a reference standard (Table 3 and Table S4). Within series 3, only the (E)-9-bromo-5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline 3a and (E)-9-bromo-5-(4-fluorostyryl)tetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline 3b were found to exhibit significant cytotoxicity against both cell lines. 9-Bromo-5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline 3a represents the most cytotoxic compound and is considerably more cytotoxic than the anticancer drug Melphalan against both the MCF-7 and HeLa cell lines. No activity was observed for the 4-chlorostyryl derivative 3c. Replacement of bromine atom with a 4-fluorophenyl group in compounds 4a–c resulted in loss of activity against both cell lines. Within the 9-styryl substituted derivatives 4d–f, only the 9-(4-fluorostyryl) derivative 4e was found to be selective against the MCF-7 cell line and to exhibit comparable cytotoxicity to that of Melphalan (IC50 = 61 μM) with IC50 value of 62 μM. Replacement of bromine with 4-fluorophenylethynyl group in compounds 5a–c also resulted in complete loss of activity against both cell lines.

Table 3

Cytotoxic effects of 3a–c, 4a–f and 5a–c against MCF-7 and HeLa cell lines.

Compound	R	IC50 Values
		MCF-7	HeLa
3a	H	9.6	7.3
3b	4-F	21.0	22.4
3c	4-Cl	88.6	121.0
4a	H	>200	>200
4b	4-F	85.9	196.0
4c	4-Cl	>200	>200
4d	H	>200	>200
4e	4-F	62.0	184.0
4f	4-Cl	>200	>200
5a	H	>200	>200
5b	4-F	>200	>200
5c	4-Cl	>200	>200
		61.0	88.9

Previous structure activity relationship studies revealed that the entire styrylquinazolinone scaffold was essential for the inhibition of n class="Gene">tubulin polymerization and their biological activity is enhanced by the presence of a halide or small hydrophobic substituents at position 6 [13]. From these preliminary in vitro cytotoxicity results and SAR, it is observed that a bulky group at the 9-position of the 5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline moiety generally leads to loss of cytotoxicity. The observed cytotoxicity of 3a and 3b is due to the presence of a halide or small hydrophobic substituents at position 9 in analogy with the literature observation for the analogous styrylquinazolinones [7,13,14]. The 6-substituted 2-styrylquinazoline derivatives have been found to exhibit antimitotic properties and to inhibit tubulin polymerization [13]. This protein is often used as a model in molecular docking studies to predict the hypothetical protein-ligand binding mode, which plays a significant role in structural based drug design and structure activity relationship. Molecules that bind to tubulin are known to prevent the controlled assembly and disassembly of the microtubule structures and induce apoptosis [5]. The anticancer properties of the 6-substituted 2-styrylquinazolines [13] and the 1,5-diaryl substituted 1,2,3,4-tetrazoles [2] as tubulin polymerization inhibitors prompted us to conduct molecular docking of the most active compounds 3a, 3b and 4e against tubulin to predict their hypothetical protein-ligand binding mode.

2.2.2. Molecular Docking Studies of 3a, 3b and 4e into Tubulin

A crystal structure of tubulin was obtained from the protein data bank (n class="Disease">PDB ID: 1TUB). Molecular docking was conducted in order to determine if compounds 3a, 3b and 4e could bind tubulin. The 6-bromo–substituted derivative 3a docked to tubulin between the two subunits of the heterodimer (Figure 2) and binding interactions included a hydrogen bond between the derivative and ASN101 or LYS254 of tubulin as well as pi-alkyl, amide-pi stacked and alkyl interactions (Figure 3). Derivative 3b also bound tubulin in the same site between the dimeric subunits with a hydrogen bond that forms between ASN101 or LYS254 and a halogen bond between the derivative’s fluorine residue and TYR172 of tubulin (Figure 3). When 4e was docked to the tubulin heterodimer (Figure 3) it also bound the same site, but the binding did not involve hydrogen bonding but rather the presence of two fluorine residues resulted in halogen interactions between the compound and GLU71, ASN206 and GLU207 of tubulin. Docking studies revealed that the tetrazoloquinazolines that showed anti-proliferative activity could act by binding tubulin at the dimer interface. This binding will affect the microtubule changes that take place in cells during cell division and hence lead to cell death.

Figure 2

Compounds 3a, 3b (light and dark grey respectively) and 4e (orange) docked at the dimer interface of a tubulin heterodimer (PDB code 1TUB) with chains coloured blue and green.

Figure 3

2D interaction diagram for the binding of tubulin (PDB code 1TUB) with 3a, 3b and 4e. Residues are annotated with their 3-letter amino acid code and interactions listed below the diagram.

3. Experimental

Melting points were recorded on a Thermocouple digital melting point apparatus (Stuart, Staffordshire, UK) and are uncorrected. IR spectra were recorded as powders using a Bruker VERTEX 70 FT-IR Spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Billerica, MA, USA) with a diamond ATR (attenuated total reflectance) accessory by using the thin-film method. For column chromatography, Merck kieselgel 60 (0.063–0.200 mm) (Merck KGaA, Frankfurt, Germany) was used as the stationary phase. NMR spectra were obtained as DMSO-d6 solutions using either the Varian 300 MHz NMR spectrometer (Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) or Agilent 500 MHz NMR spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Oxford, UK) and the chemical shifts are quoted relative to the TMS peak. Low- and high-resolution mass spectra were recorded at an ionization potential of 70 eV using Waters Synapt G2 Quadrupole Time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) at the University of Stellenbosch Mass Spectrometry Unit. The elemental analyses were obtained using a Vario EL Cube Elemental Analyzer (Elementar, Langenselbold, Germany) at the University of n class="Disease">Stellenbosch Central Analytical Facility. The synthesis and characterization of compounds 1a–c have been described before [7].

3.1. Typical Procedure for the Phosphoryl-Mediated Chlorination-Dehydration of ; the Synthesis of

A mixture of 6-bromo-2-styrylquinazolin-4(3H)-one 1a (0.50 g, 1.55 mmol), n class="Chemical">phosphoryl chloride (20 mL) and triethylamine (2 drops) was heated under reflux for 8 h and then allowed to cool to RT. The mixture was poured slowly into an ice-cold aqueous ammonia with vigorous stirring. The resulting precipitate was filtered, washed thoroughly with ice-cold water and then recrystallized to afford 2. Compounds 2a–c were prepared in this fashion.

(E)-6-Bromo-4-chloro-2-styrylquinazoline (2a). Yellow solid (0.41 g, 78%), m.p. 203–205 °C (ethanol); νmax (ATR) 539, 682, 752, 839, 972, 1557, 3934 cm−1; n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) 7.27 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Hb), 7.36–7.44 (3H, m, 3′,5′-H and 4′-H), 7.65 (2H, d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2′,6′-H), 7.85 (1H, d, J = 8.7 Hz, 8-H), 7.98 (1H, dd, J = 2.4 Hz and 8.7 Hz, 7-H), 8.13 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Ha), 8.35 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz, 5-H); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) 119.3, 120.2, 122.9, 128.3, 128.6, 129.0, 129.6, 130.7, 135.1, 138.0, 140.4, 147.1, 153.0, 161.0; HRMS (ES): MH+, found 344.9785. C16H11N235Cl79Br+ requires 344.9794. Anal. calcd. for C16H10N2ClBr: C, 55.60; H, 2.92; N, 8.11. Found: C, 55.63; H, 2.90; N, 8.06.

(E)-6-Bromo-4-chloro-2-(4-fluorostyryl)quinazoline (2b). Yellow solid (0.37 g, 71%), m.p. 215–217 °C (ethanol); νmax (ATR) 520, 819, 828, 948, 1208, 1598, 2922 cm−1; n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) 7.10 (2H, t, J = 9.0 Hz, 3′,5′-H), 7.20 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Hb), 7.63 (2H, dd, J = 2.0 Hz and 9.0 Hz, 2′,6′-H), 7.85 (1H, d, J = 8.7 Hz, 8-H), 8.00 (1H, dd, J = 2.4 Hz and 8.7 Hz, 7-H), 8.10 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Ha), 8.37 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz, 5-H); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) 166.6 (d, 2JCF = 20.9 Hz), 119.2, 120.4, 123.0, 128.5, 129.2, 130.45 (d, 3JCF = 8.5 Hz), 131.8 (d, 4JCF = 3.8 Hz), 137.9, 138.8, 147.5, 152.6, 160.9, 163.5 (d, 1JCF = 247.5 Hz); HRMS (ES): MH+, found 362.9698. C16H10N2F35Cl79Br+ requires 362.9700. Anal. calcd. for C16H9N2FClBr: C, 52.85; H, 2.49; N, 7.70. Found: C, 52.83; H, 2.47; N, 7.68.

(E)-6-Bromo-4-chloro-2-(4-chlorostyryl)quinazoline (2c). Yellow solid (0.47 g, 71%), m.p. 210–212 °C (ethanol); νmax (ATR) 496, 662, 813, 830, 972, 991, 1558, 2921 cm−1; n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) 7.24 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Hb), 7.38 (2H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, 3′,5′-H), 7.58 (2H, d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2′,6′-H), 7.85 (1H, d, J = 9.0 Hz, 8-H), 7.99 (1H, dd, J = 2.4 Hz and 9.0 Hz, 7-H), 8.08 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Ha), 8.37 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz, 5-H); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) 119.3, 123.3, 124.4, 128.0, 128.3, 128.4, 130.0, 130.6, 131.7, 133.2, 133.9, 134.4, 137.8, 148.2; HRMS (ES): MH+, found: 378.9492. C16H10N235Cl79Br+ requires: 378.9404. Anal. calcd. for C16H9N2Cl2Br: C, 50.56; H, 2.39; N, 7.37. Found: C, 50.54; H, 2.36; N, 7.36.

3.2. Typical Procedure for the Synthesis of Tetrazoloquinazolines

A stirred mixture of 2 (1 equivalent) and sodium azide (1.2 equivalent) in n class="Chemical">DMF (26 mL/mmol of 2) was heated at 45 °C for 4 h. The mixture was allowed to cool to RT and then quenched with ice-cold water. The resultant precipitate was filtered and recrystallized from acetonitrile to afford 3. The following compounds were prepared in this fashion:

(E)-9-Bromo-5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline (3a). A mixture of 2a (0.20 g, 0.58 mmol) and n class="Chemical">sodium azide (0.04 g, 0.62 mmol) in DMF (15 mL) afforded 3a as a brown solid (0.15 g, 72%), m.p. 214–216 °C (acetonitrile); νmax (ATR) 558, 686, 761, 836, 975, 1076, 1385, 1495, 1633, 3026, 3082 cm−1; 1H-NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) 7.48–7.50 (3H, m, 3′,5′-H and 4′-H), 7.89 (2H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2′,6′-H), 7.91 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Hb), 8.06 (1H, d, J = 8.7 Hz, 7-H ), 8.19 (1H, dd, J = 2.4 and 9.0 Hz, 8-H), 8.37 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Ha), 8.67 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz, 10-H); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) 116.5, 116.9, 122.3, 127.0, 129.1, 129.7, 131.0, 131.3, 135.0, 137.1, 142.2, 143.0, 143.6, 149.0; HRMS (ES): MH+, found: 352.0189. C16H11N579Br+ requires: 352.0188. Anal. calcd. for C16H10N5Br: C, 54.56; H, 2.86; N, 19.89. Found: C, 54.54; H, 2.89, N, 9.86.

(E)-9-Bromo-5-(4-fluorostyryl)tetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline (3b). A mixture of 2b (0.20 g, 0.55 mmol) and sodium azide (0.04 g, 0.66 mmol) in DMF (14 mL) afforded 3b as a brown solid (0.16 g, 81%), m.p. 217–218 °C (acetonitrile); νmax (ATR) 517, 828, 979, 1079, 1161, 123, 1269, 1470, 1508, 1586, 1637 cm−1; 1H-NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) 7.34 (2H, t, J = 9.0 Hz, 3′,5′-H), 7.89 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Hb), 8.00–8.07 (3H, m, Ar), 8.19 (1H, dd, J = 2.4 and 9.0 Hz, 8-H), 8.38 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Ha), 8.69 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz, 10-H); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) 116.4, 166.6 (d, 2JCF = 21.7 Hz), 116.7, 122.2, 126.7, 130.7, 131.5 (d, 3JCF = 8.5 Hz), 131.67 (d, 4JCF = 2.8 Hz), 137.2, 141.8, 142.2, 143.6, 148.7, 163.9 (d, 1JCF = 247.4 Hz); HRMS (ES): MH+, found: 370.0101. C16H10N5F79Br+ requires: 370.0104. Anal. calcd. for C16H9N5FBr: C, 51.91; H, 2.45; N, 18.92. Found: C, 51.90; H, 2.42; N, 18.89.

(E)-9-Bromo-5-(4-chlorostyryl)tetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline (3c). A mixture of 2c (0.20 g, 0.63 mmol) and n class="Chemical">sodium azide (0.05 g, 0.76 mmol) in DMF (20 mL) afforded 3c as a brown solid (0.15 g, 63%), m.p. 234–236 °C (acetonitrile); νmax (ATR) 465, 500, 766, 809, 820, 1090, 1387, 1470, 1501, 1582, 1633 cm−1; 1H-NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) 7.44 (2H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, 3′,5′-H), 7.93 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Hb), 7.91 (2H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2′,6′-H), 8.05 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, 7-H), 8.17 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, 8-H), 8.36 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Ha), 8.70 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz, 10-H); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) 116.7, 117.3, 122.4, 126.7, 129.7 (2 × C), 130.8, 133.9, 135.8, 137.1, 141.5, 142.2, 143.5, 148.9; RMS (ES): MH+, found: 386.1464. C16H9N535Cl79Br + requires: 386.1464. Anal. calcd. for C16H9N5ClBr: C, 49.70; H, 2.35; N, 18.11. Found: C, 49.67; H, 2.33; N, 18.10.

3.3. Typical Procedure for the Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling of ; Synthesis of

To a three-necked flask equipped with stirrer, rubber septum, thermometer and a condenser fitted with a balloon at the top was added 3a (0.30 g, 0.85 mmol) and DMF (15 mL) under n class="Chemical">nitrogen atmosphere. 4-Fluorophenylboronic acid (0.18 g, 1.28 mmol), PdCl2(P(Cy)3)2 (0.06 g, 0.085 mmol), K2CO3 (0.14 g, 1.02 mmol) and water (5 mL) were added to the mixture under nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was heated at 100 °C for 3 h and then poured into ice-cold water. The product was extracted into chloroform and the combined organic phases were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4 and the salt was filtered off. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using 9:1 toluene-ethyl acetate (v/v) as an eluent. The following products were prepared in this fashion.

(E)-9-(4-Fluorophenyl)-5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline (4a). Solid (0.17 g, 53%), R 0.62, m.p. 243–245 °C; νmax (ATR) 524, 588, 683, 749, 823, 972, 1227, 1484, 1634, 2854, 2924, 3029 cm−1; δH (500 MHz, n class="Chemical">DMSO-d6) 7.37 (3H, t, J = 9.0 Hz, 2″,6″-H), 7.47–7.51 (3H, m, Ph), 7.90–7.99 (5H, m, Ha, 2″,6″-H and Ph), 8.18 (1H, d, J = 9 Hz, 7-H), 8.32 (1H, dd, J = 2.0 Hz and 8.0 Hz, 8-H), 8.37 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Hb), 8.73 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, 10-H); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) 115.6, 116.6 (2JCF = 21.9 Hz), 116.8, 121.7, 129.0, 129.4, 129.7 (2 × C), 129.9 (3JCF = 8.5 Hz), 131.2, 132.7, 135.1, 140.0, 142,4, 142.5 (3JCF = 2.9 Hz), 143.1, 149.6, 163.0 (1JCF = 244.6 Hz); 19F-NMR (282 MHz, DMSO-d6) −113.08 (1F, ddd, J = 8.0, 14.6, 21.2 Hz); HRMS (ES): MH+, found: 368.1311. C22H14N5F+ requires: 368.1307. Anal. calcd. for C16H14N5F: C, 71.92; H, 3.84; N, 19.06. Found: C, 71.91; H, 3.82; N, 19.03.

(E)-9-(4-Fluorophenyl)-5-(4-fluorostyryl)tetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline (4b). Solid (0.22 g, 51%), R 0.84, m.p. 218–220 °C; νmax (ATR) 537, 820, 975, 1158, 1234, 1484, 1511, 1635, 2853, 2924, 3045 cm−1; δH (500 MHz, n class="Chemical">DMSO-d6) 7.33 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3′,5′-H), 7.37 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3″,5″-H), 7.88 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Hb), 7.96 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2′,4′-H), 8.00 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2″,6″-H), 8.17 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, 7-H), 8.32 (1H, dd, J = 2 and 8.5 Hz, 8-H), 8.36 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Ha), 8.71 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, 10-H); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) 115.6, 116.6 (2JCF = 21.8 Hz), 116.7 (2JCF = 21.8 Hz), 116.8, 121.7, 129.4, 129.9 (3JCF = 8.5 Hz), 131.4 (3JCF = 8.5 Hz), 131.8 (3JCF = 2.8 Hz), 132.6, 135.0 (3JCF = 2.9 Hz), 140.0, 141.3, 142.5 (3JCF = 2.9 Hz), 143.0, 149.6, 163.0 (1JCF = 245.6 Hz), 163.9 (1JCF = 247.5 Hz); 19F-NMR (282 MHz, DMSO-d6) −109.4 (1F, ddd, J = 4.7, 8.0 and 19.7 Hz), −133.74 (1F, ddd, J = 4.7, 8.0 and 19.8 Hz); HRMS (ES): MH+, found: 386.1214. C22H14N5F2+ requires 386.1217. Anal. calcd. for C16H13N5F2: C, 68.57; H, 3.40; N, 18.17. Found: C, 68.56; H, 3.37; N, 18.16.

(E)-5-(4-Chlorostyryl)-9-(4-fluorophenyl)tetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline (4c). Solid (0.11 g, 50%), R 0.56, m.p. 238–240 °C; νmax (ATR) 473, 510, 766, 829, 981, 1074, 1296, 1387, 1469, 1501, 1582, 1633, 3069 cm−1; δH (500 MHz, n class="Chemical">DMSO-d6) 7.03 (1H, d, J = 16.5 Hz, Hb), 7.32 (2H, t, J = 9.0 Hz, 3′,5′-H), 7.52 (2H, d, J = 9.0 Hz, 3″,5″-H), 7.68 (2H, d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2′,6′-H), 7.76 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, 7-H), 8.82 (2H, t, J = 9.0 Hz, 2″,6″-H), 7.51 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.5 Hz, Ha), 8.12 (1H, dd, J = 2.0 Hz and 8.0 Hz, 8-H), 8.29 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, 10-H); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) 116.1 (d, 2JCF = 21.8 Hz), 121.1, 121.8, 124.2, 127.7, 128.1, 128.9, 129.4 (3JCF = 8.5 Hz), 129.6, 130.4, 132.6, 133.9 (d, 4JCF = 2.9 Hz), 134.0, 135.4, 135.8, 139.1, 151.7, 163.3 (1JCF = 243.6 Hz); 19F-NMR (282 MHz, DMSO-d6) −113.7 (1F, ddd, J = 6.6, 9.9 and 19.7 Hz); HRMS (ES): MH+, found: 402.0897. C24H14N5F35Cl+ requires 402.0922. Anal. calcd. for C16H13N5F2: C, 65.76; H, 3.26; N, 17.43. Found: C, 65.73; H, 3.25; N, 17.42.

9-((E)-4-Fluorostyryl)-5-((E)-styryl)tetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline (4d). Solid (0.15 g, 47%), R 0.51, m.p. 213–215 °C; νmax (ATR) 520, 591, 691, 754, 832, 980, 1235, 1501, 1634, 3025 cm−1; δH (500 MHz, n class="Chemical">DMSO-d6) 7.24 (2H, t, J = 8.5 Hz, 3″,5″-H), 7.37 (1H, t, J = 5.0 Hz, 4′), 7.38 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Hb), 7.50 (2H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3′,5′-H), 7.52 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Hb), 7.58 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Ha), 7.73 (2H, t, J 7.0 = Hz, 2′,6′-H), 7.89 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2″,6″-H), 8.10 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, 7-H), 8.27 (1H, dd, J = 1.5 Hz and 8.5 Hz, 8-H), 8.35 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Ha), 8.69 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, 10-H); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) 114.9, 116.5 (d, 2JCF = 20.8 Hz), 129.1, 129.3, 129.4, 129.5, 129.6, 129.9 (2 × C), 130.0 (d, 2JCF = 20.9 Hz), 130.6, 132.0, 132.9 (d, 4JCF = 2.8 Hz), 134.9, 137.2, 140.6, 141.6, 146.8, 148.7, 163.0 (d, 1JCF = 245.6 Hz); 19F-NMR (282 MHz, DMSO-d6) −113.71 (1F, ddd, J = 6.6, 9.9, 19.7 Hz); HRMS (ES): MH+, found: 394.1468. C24H17N5F+ requires: 394.1455. Anal. calcd. for C16H16N5F2: C, 73.27; H, 4.10; N, 17.80. Found: C, 73.24; H, 4.07; N, 17.78.

5,9-Bis((E)-4-fluorostyryl)tetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline (4e). Solid (0.25 g, 58%), R 0.80, m.p. 241–243 °C; νmax (ATR) 508, 819, 971, 1159, 1233, 1484, 1509, 1635, 2853, 2924, 3045 cm−1; δH (300 MHz, n class="Chemical">DMSO-d6) 7.22 (2H, t, J = 9.0 Hz, 3′,5′-H), 7.30 (2H, t, J = 9.0 Hz, 3″,5″-H), 7.45 (1H, d Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Hb), 7.54 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Hb), 7.69 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2′,6′-H), 7.80 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Ha), 7.96 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2″,6″-H), 8.03 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, 7-H), 8.21 (1H, dd, J = 1.5 and 8.5 Hz, 8-H), 8.28 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Ha), 8.58 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, 10-H); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) 115.5, 116.1 (2JCF = 20.9 Hz), 116.6 (2JCF = 21.9 Hz), 122.0, 127.1, 128.8, 129.0 (d, 3JCF = 8.6 Hz), 130.9, 131.3, 131.5 (d, 3JCF = 8.5 Hz), 131.6, 131.8 (d, 4JCF = 2.8 Hz), 133.7 (d, 4JCF = 3.0 Hz), 138.4, 141.0, 142.5, 142.6, 149.5, 162.0 (d, 1JCF = 248.0 Hz), 163.8 (d, 1JCF = 247.4 Hz); 19F-NMR (282 MHz, DMSO-d6) −109.5 (1F, ddd, J = 5.2, 8.5 and 18.3 Hz), −110.2 (1F, ddd, J = 5.2, 9.8 and 15.0 Hz); HRMS (ES): MH+, found: 412.1366. C24H16N535F2+ requires 412.1374. Anal. calcd. for C16H15N5F2: C, 70.07; H, 3.67; N, 17.02. Found: C, 70.05; H, 3.66; N, 17.00.

5-((E)-4-Chlorostyryl)-9-((E)-4-fluorostyryl)tetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline (4f). Solid (0.12 g, 55%), R 0.51, m.p. 238–241 °C; νmax (ATR) 515, 592, 789, 814, 840, 970, 1014, 1074, 1096, 1234, 1499, 1589, 1636 cm−1; δH (500 MHz, n class="Chemical">DMSO-d6) 7.22 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3″,5″-H), 7.45 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Hb), 7.51 (2H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3′,5′-H), 7.54 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Hb′), 7.70 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2′,4′-H), 7.86 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Ha), 7.90 (2H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2″,6-H), 8.04 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, 7-H), 8.23 (1H, dd, J = 1.5 and 8.5 Hz, 8-H), 8.28 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Ha′), 8.59 (1H, d, J 1.5 Hz, 10-H); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) 116.3 (d, 2JCF = 21.7 Hz), 121.4, 123.4, 127.7, 129.2 (d, 3JCF = 8.0 Hz), 129.7, 129.5, 133.1, 135.8 (d, 4JCF = 3.0 Hz), 136.9, 130.4, 132.6, 133.9 (d, 4JCF = 2.9 Hz), 134.0, 135.4, 135.8, 139.1, 148.6, 154.9, 163.1 (d, 1JCF = 242.5 Hz); 19F-NMR (282 MHz, DMSO-d6) −113.71 (1F, ddd, J = 6.6, 10.0, 19.7 Hz); HRMS (ES): MH+, found: 428.1073. C24H16N535ClF+ requires: 428.1078. Anal. calcd. for C16H15N5FCl, 67.37; H, 3.53; N, 16.37. Found: C, 67.35; H, 3.49; N, 16.34.

3.4. Typical Procedure for the One-Pot SNAr-Heteroannulation and Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling of to Afford

A mixture of 2a (0.20 g, 0.58 mmol) and sodium azide (0.04 g, 0.62 mmol) was stirred at 45 °C for 4 hn class="Chemical">. 4-Fluorophenylboronic acid (0.12 g, 0.86 mmol), PdCl2(P(Cy)3)2 (0.04 g, 0.058 mmol), K2CO3 (1.00 g, 0.70 mmol) and water (15 mL) were then added to the mixture under nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was heated at 100 °C for 3 h and then poured into ice-cold water. The product was extracted into chloroform and the combined organic phases were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4 and the salt was filtered off. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel. Compounds 4a–f were prepared in this fashion; see Table 1 under Scheme 2 for the corresponding yields.

3.5. Typical Procedure for the Sonogashira Cross-Coupling of ; Synthesis of

A mixture of 3a (0.30 g, 0.86 mmol), 4-fluorophenylacetylene (0.16 g, 1.30 mmol), n class="Gene">PdCl2(P(Cy)3)2 (0.06 g, 0.08 mmol), CuI (0.016 g, 0.08 mmol) and Cs2CO3 (0.40 g, 0.13 mmol) in DMF (15 mL) was heated at 100 °C for 2 h under nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was then poured into ice-cold water. The resultant precipitate was filtered and purified by column chromatography on silica gel using 9:1 toluene–ethyl acetate (v/v) as an eluent. Compounds 5a–c were prepared in this fashion.

(E)-9-((4-Fluorophenyl)ethynyl)-5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline (5a). Solid (0.17 g, 50%), R 0.70, m.p. 175–177 °C; νmax (ATR) 467, 686, 750, 829, 975, 1229, 1506, 1588, 1630, 2202, 2923 cm−1; δH (500 MHz, n class="Chemical">DMSO-d6) 7.30 (2H, t, J = 9.0 Hz, 3″,5″-H), 7.47–7.47 (3H, m, Ph), 7.72 (2H, t, J = 9.0 Hz, 2″,6″-H), 7.87 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Hb), 7.85–7.91 (2H, m, Ph), 8.08 (1H, d, J = 9.0 Hz, 7-H), 8.16 (1H, dd, J = 1.8 Hz and 9.0 Hz, 8-H), 8.04 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.5 Hz, Ha), 8.65 (1H, d, J = 1.8 Hz, 10-H); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) 88.4, 91.9, 115.5, 115.6 (d, 2JCF = 21.9 Hz), 115.7, 118.6 (d, 4JCF = 2.9 Hz), 121.7, 129.0, 129.4, 129.7 (2 × C), 131.3, 134.6 (d, 3JCF = 8.5 Hz), 135.0, 136.4, 142.9, 143.1, 143.7, 149.0, 163.19 (d, 1JCF = 245.7 Hz); 19F-NMR (282 MHz, DMSO-d6) −113.16 (1F, d, J = 4.7 Hz); HRMS (ES): MH+, found: 392.1304. C24H15N5F+ requires: 392.1311. Anal. calcd. for C16H14N5F: C, 73.65; H, 3.61; N, 17.89. Found: C, 73.59; H, 3.60; N, 17.64.

(E)-9-((4-Fluorophenyl)ethynyl)-5-(4-fluorostyryl)tetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline (5b). Solid (0.12 g, 48%), R 0.54, m.p. 204–206 °C; νmax (ATR) 508, 812, 834, 1234, 1506, 1588, 1635, 2361, 3023 cm−1; δH (300 MHz, n class="Chemical">DMSO-d6) 7.33 (2H, t, J = 9.0 Hz, 3′,5′-H), 7.33 (2H, t, J = 9.0 Hz, 3″,5″-H), 7.73 (2H, t, J = 9.0 Hz, 2′,6′-H), 7.91 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Hb), 8.04 (2H, t, J = 9.0 Hz, 2″,6″-H), 8.12 (1H, dd, J = 1.2 and 8.4 Hz, 8-H), 8.12 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, 7-H), 8.39 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Ha), 8.67 (1H, d, J = 1.2 Hz, 10-H); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) 88.8, 90.4, 116.3 (d, 2JCF = 21.8 Hz), 116.5 (d, 2JCF = 21.8 Hz), 118.8 (d, 4JCF = 3.0 Hz), 120.9, 126.9, 128.4, 129.1, 129.3, 129.6 (d, 4JCF = 2.8 Hz), 129.9, 134.1, 134.4 (d, 3JCF = 8.5 Hz), 134.5 (d, 3JCF = 8.5 Hz), 136.6, 137.4, 151.2, 161.4 d, 1JCF = 245.7 Hz), 163.1 (d, 1JCF = 244.7 Hz); 19F-NMR (282 MHz, DMSO-d6) −109.2 (1F, ddd, J = 6.6, 9.9 and 20.2 Hz), −109.5 (1F, ddd, J = 3.3, 8.5, 16.5 Hz); HRMS (ES): MH+, found: 410.1216. C24H14N5F2+ requires: 410.1217. Anal. calcd. for C16H13N5F2: C, 70.41; H, 3.20; N, 17.11. Found: C, 70.39; H, 2.99; N, 17.01.

(E)-5-(4-Chlorostyryl)-9-((4-fluorophenyl)ethynyl)tetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline (5c). Solid (0.16 g, 52%), R 0.61, m.p. 235–237 °C; νmax (ATR) 520, 820, 1091, 1232, 1495, 1587, 1633, 2216, 3059 cm−1; δH (500 MHz, n class="Chemical">DMSO-d6) 7.35 (2H, t, J 8.7 Hz, 3″,5″-H), 7.52 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, 3′,5′-H), 7.89 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Hb), 7.92 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2′,6′-H), 7.93 (2H, t, J 8.7 Hz, 2″,6″-H), 8.13 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, 7-H), 8.30 (1H, d, Jtrans = 16.0 Hz, Ha), 8.28 (1H, dd, J = 1.2 Hz and 9.0 Hz, 8-H), 8.67 (1H, d, J = 1.2 Hz, 10-H); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) 88.4, 90.4, 115.5, 115.6 (d, 2JCF = 21.9 Hz), 115.7, 118.6 (d, 4JCF = 2.9 Hz), 123.1, 127.1, 129.1, 129.2, 129.7, 131.3, 134.6 (d, 3JCF = 8.5 Hz), 135.0, 136.4, 142.9, 143.1, 143.7, 149.0, 162.9 (d, 1JCF = 247.5 Hz); 19F-NMR (282 MHz, DMSO-d6) −113.70 (1F, dd, J = 4.7 and 14.6 Hz); HRMS (ES): MH+, found: 426.0916. C24H14N535ClF+ requires: 426.0922. Anal. calcd. for C16H13N5FCl: C, 67.69; H, 3.08; N, 16.45. Found: C, 67.70; H, 3.06; N, 16.41.

3.6. Typical Procedure for the One-Pot SNAr-Heteroannulation and Sonogashira Cross-Coupling of to Afford

A mixture of 2a (0.40 g, 1.16 mmol) and sodium azide (0.08 g, 1.24 mmol) in n class="Chemical">DMF ( 20 mL) was stirred at 45 °C for 4 h. 4-Fluorophenylacetylene (0.21 g, 1.71 mmol), PdCl2(P(Cy)3)2 (0.04 g, 0.06 mmol), CuI (0.01 g, 0.06 mmol), Cs2CO3 (0.45 g, 1.37 mmol) and water (5 mL) were added to the mixture under nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was heated at 90 °C for 4 h and then poured into ice-cold water. The product was extracted into chloroform and the combined organic phases were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4 and the salt was filtered off. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel. Compounds 5a–c were prepared in this fashion; see Table 2 under Scheme 3 for the corresponding yields.

3.7. Cytotoxicity Screening Protocol

The human n class="Disease">tumour cell lines, HeLa and MCF7, were grown in RPMI and DMEM respectively and supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum and 2 mM l-glutamine. For a screening experiment, cells were inoculated into 96 well microtiter plates at a density of 6000 cells/well using a volume of 100 μL in each well. After cell inoculation, the microtiter plates were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and 100% relative humidity for approximately 24 h prior to addition of test compounds. At the time of test compound addition, the samples were diluted to double the desired final maximum test concentration with complete medium and additional dilutions were made to provide five drug concentrations. Aliquots of 100 µL of these different drug dilutions were added to the appropriate microtiter wells already containing 100 µL of medium, resulting in the required final drug concentrations. Following test sample addition, the plates were incubated for a further 48 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2, in a humidified incubator. At the end of this incubation period the medium was removed and replaced with fresh culture medium containing MTT at a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. The 96-well plates were returned to the incubator and incubated for an additional 3 h following which the medium was removed, the MTT crystals solubilized in DMSO and absorbance measured at 560 nm using a BioTek PowerWave XS Spectrophotometer (BioTech Instrument, Winooski, VT, USA).

3.8. Methodology for Docking Studies

Molecular docking of compounds 3a, 3b and 4e to the 3D structure of a tubulin heterodimer (PDB code:1n class="Gene">TUB [15] was carried out using the CDOCKER protocol [16] in Discovery Studio 2017. Prior to performing the docking, compounds were drawn using Discovery Studio and prepared using the ‘Prepare Ligand’ protocol. The protein structure was downloaded from the Protein Data Bank, prepared using the ‘Prepare Protein’ protocol in Discovery Studio which included removing any existing ligands bound to the model and binding sites defined from receptor cavities. The receptor cavity in this tubulin structure is present between the two monomers of the tubulin dimer structure. Docking was performed using default settings and the best conformation of the ligand selected and evaluated.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have demonstrated that the 6-bromo-4-chloro-2-styrylquinazoline scaffold undergoes sequential nucleophilic aromatic substitution-heteroannulation and n class="Chemical">palladium catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura or Sonogashira cross-coupling reactions to afford novel 9-carbo substituted 5-styryltetrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines in a single-pot operation. The tetrazoloquinazolines evaluated for anti-proliferative activity in this investigation were found to exhibit varying degrees of toxicity towards MCF-7 and HeLa cells (see Supplementary Materials S2, S3). Complete loss of cytotoxicity was observed for derivatives substituted with a 4-fluorophenyl ring directly or via a π-conjugated bridge (C=C or C≡C bond) except for the 9-(4-fluorostyryl) derivative 4e, which was found to exhibit selectivity and significant cytotoxicity against the MCF-7 cell line. It can be concluded that the presence of a bulky group at the 9-position of the tetrazoloquinazolines is undesirable for cytotoxicity. Docking studies revealed that the tetrazoloquinazolines that showed anti-proliferative activity could act by binding tubulin at the dimer interface. The binding of the compounds to tubulin would prevent tubulin polymerization or disassociation and presumably result in apoptosis.