| Literature DB >> 29072397 |
Chung Yu Lai1,2,3, Chia Chen Huang, Chin Hung Tsai, Jiun Yao Wang, Chih Ling Kerr, Yi Yu Chen, Yan Wei Cai, Ruey Hong Wong.
Abstract
Background: Smoking can cause increase of DNA methylation and hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes, this possible contributing to subsequent lung cancer development. DNA methyltransferase 3B (DNMT3B) is crucial in regulation of DNA methylation and it has been proposed that green tea might lower cancer risk through inhibiting its activity. Here, we designed a case-control study to investigate whether the DNMT3B -149 genetic polymorphism could modulate lung cancer risk due to smoking. Possible interactions of smoking and green tea consumption with this DNMT3B genetic polymorphism were also assessed. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: Cigarette smoking; lung cancer; DNA methyltransferase 3B; green tea
Year: 2017 PMID: 29072397 PMCID: PMC5747395 DOI: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.10.2717
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ISSN: 1513-7368
Basic Characteristic of Lung Cancer Patents and Healthy Controls
| Variables | Cases | Controls | Unmatched | Matched |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 190 | N = 380 | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 115 (60.5%) | 230 (60.5%) | 1.00 (0.70-1.43) | 1.00 (0.70-1.43) |
| Female | 75 (39.5%) | 150 (39.5%) | 1 | 1 |
| Age (years, mean ± SD) | 65.5 ± 11.9 | 64.4 ± 11.8 | ||
| Smoking status | ||||
| Current and ever smokers | 102 (53.7%) | 118 (31.1%) | 2.57 (1.80-3.68) | 4.67 (2.75-7.93) |
| Never smokers | 88 (46.3%) | 262 (68.9%) | 1 | 1 |
| Pack-years of smoking | ||||
| ≥40 | 65 (34.2%) | 60 (15.8%) | 3.23 (2.11-4.94) | 5.76 (3.22-10.32) |
| 1-39 | 37 (19.5%) | 58 (15.3%) | 1.90 (1.18-3.06) | 3.41 (1.81-6.41) |
| 0 | 88 (46.3%) | 262 (68.9%) | 1 | 1 |
| Green tea consumption (cups/day) | ||||
| 0 | 146 (76.8%) | 250 (65.8%) | 2.96 (1.64-5.34) | 3.02 (1.64-5.55) |
| < 1 | 29 (15.3%) | 54 (14.2%) | 2.72 (1.33-5.56) | 2.49 (1.21-5.12) |
| ≥ 1 | 15 (7.9%) | 76 (20.0%) | 1 | 1 |
| Green tea consumption (years) | ||||
| 0 | 146 (76.8%) | 250 (65.8%) | 1.75 (1.03-2.99) | 1.92 (1.09-3.36) |
| ≤10 | 23 (12.1%) | 67 (17.6%) | 1.03 (0.52-2.04) | 1.02 (0.51-2.01) |
| >10 | 21 (11.1%) | 63 (16.6%) | 1 | 1 |
| Vegetables and fruits intake (servings/week) | ||||
| ≤14 | 48 (25.3%) | 110 (28.9%) | 0.94 (0.62-1.43) | 0.89 (0.59-1.37) |
| 15-20 | 51 (26.8%) | 74 (19.5%) | 1.48 (0.96, 2.29) | 1.41 (0.91-2.18) |
| ≥21 | 91 (47.9%) | 196 (51.6%) | 1 | 1 |
| Exposure to cooking fumes (hours/week) | ||||
| ≥3 | 17 (8.9%) | 16 (4.2%) | 2.41 (1.19-4.89) | 2.77 (1.29-5.96) |
| 1-3 | 19 (10.0%) | 15 (4.0%) | 2.87 (1.42-5.80) | 3.38 (1.57-7.29) |
| <1 | 154 (81.1%) | 349 (91.8%) | 1 | 1 |
| Family history of lung cancer | ||||
| Yes | 15 (7.9%) | 6 (1.6%) | 5.34 (2.04-14.00) | 6.80 (2.24-20.65) |
| No | 175 (92.1%) | 374 (98.4%) | 1 | 1 |
Data were calculated by unconditional logistic regression;
Data were matched by age and gender, calculated by conditional logistic regression;
P<0.001;
0.001
0.01
Genotypic Frequency of DNMT3B -149 among Lung Cancer Patients and Healthy Controls
| Variables | Cases | Controls | Unmatched | Matched | Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N=190 | N=380 | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
| TT | 183 (96.3%) | 345 (90.8%) | 2.65 (1.16-6.09) | 2.65 (1.15-6.10) | 2.58 (0.98-6.78) |
| CT | 7 (3.7%) | 35 (9.2%) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| CC | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |||
| T allele | 373 (98.2%) | 725 (95.4%) | 2.57 (1.13-5.85) | 2.24 (1.03-4.88) | 1.9 (0.84-4.28) |
| C allele | 7 (1.8%) | 35 (4.6%) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Data were calculated by unconditional logistic regression;
Data were matched by age and gender, calculated by conditional logistic regression;
Matched data were calculated by conditional logistic regression and adjusted for pack-years of smoking, green tea consumption, exposure to cooking fumes, and family history of lung cancer;
P, 0.02;
P, 0.04;
P, 0.06.
The Joint Effects of Cigarette Smoking with DNMT3B -149 Genotypes for Lung Cancer Risk
| Variables | Smoking status | Pack-years of smoking | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Never smokers | Current and ever smokers | 0 | 1-39 | ≥40 | ||||||
| CA/CN | OR (95% CI) | CA/CN | OR (95% CI) | CA/CN | OR (95% CI) | CA/CN | OR (95% CI) | CA/CN | OR (95% CI) | |
| DNMT3B -149 genotypes | ||||||||||
| TT | 83/242 | 1.12 (0.39-3.22) | 100/103 | 7.69 (2.55-23.14) | 83/243 | 1.12 (0.39-3.21) | 37/52 | 5.62 (1.77-17.89) | 63/51 | 9.57 (3.09-29.66) |
| CT | 5/20 | 1 | 2/15 | 0.89 (0.13-6.16) | 5/20 | 1 | 0/6 | 0.41 (0.18-0.93) | 2/9 | 1.43 (0.19-10.80) |
| TT | 83/242 | 1.09 (0.37-3.21) | 100/103 | 11.03 (1.55-78.50) | 83/243 | 1.09 (0.37-3.21) | 37/52 | 3.38 (0.58-19.75) | 63/51 | 7.93 (0.92-68.43) |
| CT | 5/20 | 1 | 2/15 | 1 | 5/20 | 1 | 0/6 | 1 | 2/9 | 1 |
| Test for interaction | χ2=4.75 (1 df); P=0.03 | χ2=6.26 (2 df); P=0.04 | ||||||||
Data were matched by age and gender, calculated by (exact) conditional logistic regression and adjusted for green tea consumption, exposure to cooking fumes, and family history of lung cancer;
P<0.01.
The Joint Effects of Green Tea Consumption with DNMT3B -149 Genotypes for Lung Cancer Risk
| Variables | Drinking status | Drinking duration in years | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drinkers | No drinkers | >10 | ≤0 | 0 | ||||||
| CA/CN | OR (95% CI) | CA/CN | OR (95% CI) | CA/CN | OR (95% CI) | CA/CN | OR (95% CI) | CA/CN | OR (95% CI) | |
| DNMT3B -149 genotypes | ||||||||||
| TT | 42/121 | 2.33 (0.46-11.80) | 141/224 | 4.20 (0.85-20.87) | 19/58 | 1.06 (0.17-6.50) | 23/63 | 1.37 (0.23-8.32) | 141/224 | 2.17 (0.38-12.59) |
| CT | 2/9 | 1 | May-26 | 1.41 (0.21-9.37) | 2/5 | 1 | 0/4 | 0.52 (0.19-1.46) | 5/26 | 0.73 (0.10-5.54) |
| TT | 42/121 | 1.91 (0.38-9.51) | 141/224 | 2.84 (0.95-8.54) | 19/58 | 0.82 (0.14-4.78) | 23/63 | 2.48 (0.02-320.47) | 141/224 | 2.84 (0.95-8.54) |
| CT | 2/9 | 1 | 5/26 | 1 | 2/5 | 1 | 0/4 | 1 | 5/26 | 1 |
| Test for interaction | χ2=0.06 (1 df); P=0.81 | χ2=2.77 (2 df); P=0.25 | ||||||||
Data were matched by age and gender, calculated by (exact) conditional logistic regression and adjusted for pack-years smoked, exposure to cooking fume, and family history of lung cancer.