BACKGROUND: Historically, US women started smoking at a later age than men and had lower relative risks for smoking-related cancers. However, more recent birth cohorts of women and men have similar smoking histories and have now reached the high-risk age for cancer. The impact of these changes on cancer incidence has not been systematically examined. METHODS: Relative risks (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and attributable fractions were calculated for cigarette smoking and incidence of 20 smoking-related cancers in 186 057 women and 266 074 men of the National Institutes of Health-AARP cohort, aged 50 to 71 years in 1995 and followed for 11 years. RESULTS: In the cohort, which included participants born between 1924 and 1945, most women and men started smoking as teenagers. RRs for current vs never smoking were similar in women and men for the following cancers: lung squamous-cell (RR women: 121.4, 95% CI: 57.3-257.4; RR men:114.6, 95% CI: 61.2-214.4), lung adenocarcinoma (RR women: 11.7, 95% CI: 9.8-14.0; RR men: 15.6, 95% CI: 12.5-19.6), laryngeal (RR women: 37.0, 95% CI: 14.9-92.3; RR men: 13.8, 95% CI: 9.3-20.2), oral cavity-pharyngeal (RR women:4.4, 95% CI: 3.3-6.0; RR men: 3.8, 95% CI: 3.0-4.7), oesophageal squamous cell (RR women: 7.3, 95% CI: 3.5-15.5; RR men: 6.2, 95% CI: 2.8-13.7), bladder (RR women: 4.7, 95% CI: 3.7-5.8; RR men: 4.0, 95% CI: 3.5-4.5), colon (RR women: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.2-1.5; RR men: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.4), and at other sites, with similar attributable fractions. CONCLUSIONS: RRs for current smoking and incidence of many smoking-related cancers are now similar in US women and men, likely reflecting converging smoking patterns. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association 2015. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.
BACKGROUND: Historically, US women started smoking at a later age than men and had lower relative risks for smoking-related cancers. However, more recent birth cohorts of women and men have similar smoking histories and have now reached the high-risk age for cancer. The impact of these changes on cancer incidence has not been systematically examined. METHODS: Relative risks (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and attributable fractions were calculated for cigarette smoking and incidence of 20 smoking-related cancers in 186 057 women and 266 074 men of the National Institutes of Health-AARP cohort, aged 50 to 71 years in 1995 and followed for 11 years. RESULTS: In the cohort, which included participants born between 1924 and 1945, most women and men started smoking as teenagers. RRs for current vs never smoking were similar in women and men for the following cancers: lung squamous-cell (RR women: 121.4, 95% CI: 57.3-257.4; RR men:114.6, 95% CI: 61.2-214.4), lung adenocarcinoma (RR women: 11.7, 95% CI: 9.8-14.0; RR men: 15.6, 95% CI: 12.5-19.6), laryngeal (RR women: 37.0, 95% CI: 14.9-92.3; RR men: 13.8, 95% CI: 9.3-20.2), oral cavity-pharyngeal (RR women:4.4, 95% CI: 3.3-6.0; RR men: 3.8, 95% CI: 3.0-4.7), oesophageal squamous cell (RR women: 7.3, 95% CI: 3.5-15.5; RR men: 6.2, 95% CI: 2.8-13.7), bladder (RR women: 4.7, 95% CI: 3.7-5.8; RR men: 4.0, 95% CI: 3.5-4.5), colon (RR women: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.2-1.5; RR men: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.4), and at other sites, with similar attributable fractions. CONCLUSIONS: RRs for current smoking and incidence of many smoking-related cancers are now similar in US women and men, likely reflecting converging smoking patterns. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association 2015. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cigarette smoking; cancer; cohort; men and women
Authors: Neal D Freedman; Debra T Silverman; Albert R Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin; Christian C Abnet Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-08-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sanjat Kanjilal; Edward W Gregg; Yiling J Cheng; Ping Zhang; David E Nelson; George Mensah; Gloria L A Beckles Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2006-11-27
Authors: Heather A Wakelee; Ellen T Chang; Scarlett L Gomez; Theresa H Keegan; Diane Feskanich; Christina A Clarke; Lars Holmberg; Lee C Yong; Laurence N Kolonel; Michael K Gould; Dee W West Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-02-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gypsyamber D'Souza; Aimee R Kreimer; Raphael Viscidi; Michael Pawlita; Carole Fakhry; Wayne M Koch; William H Westra; Maura L Gillison Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-05-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sean F Altekruse; Meredith S Shiels; Sharada P Modur; Stephanie R Land; Kristina A Crothers; Mari M Kitahata; Jennifer E Thorne; William C Mathews; Diana M Fernández-Santos; Angel M Mayor; John M Gill; Michael A Horberg; John T Brooks; Richard D Moore; Michael J Silverberg; Keri N Althoff; Eric A Engels Journal: AIDS Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: S Jane Henley; Shayne Gallaway; Simple D Singh; Mary Elizabeth O'Neil; Natasha Buchanan Lunsford; Behnoosh Momin; Thomas B Richards Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2018-10-12 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Alpa V Patel; Christine M Friedenreich; Steven C Moore; Sandra C Hayes; Julie K Silver; Kristin L Campbell; Kerri Winters-Stone; Lynn H Gerber; Stephanie M George; Janet E Fulton; Crystal Denlinger; G Stephen Morris; Trisha Hue; Kathryn H Schmitz; Charles E Matthews Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Wanis H Ibrahim; Khalid Shariff; Mufid El Mistiri; Ussama Alhomsi; Awni Alshurafa; Khalid Farooqui; Mohammed E Faris; Khaled A Aboujabal; Kamel A Aboujabal; Hafedh Ghazouani; Raza A Akbar; Muhammad A Waheed; Reyad H Mohsen; Mohsen Eledrisi Journal: Oman Med J Date: 2021-05-31