| Literature DB >> 29072394 |
Haitao Yang1, Sijing Zhou, Ruifen Shen, Shuimei Luo, Lina Li, Heng Lin, Huijuan Chen, Ziyuan Liao, Wanzun Lin, Xianhe Xie.
Abstract
Currently, some clinical trials of arsenic trioxide (As203) plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of unresectable primary liver cancer (PLC) had been conducted, but the results were controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis on 14 clinical trials (1076 cases) to evaluate efficacy and safety of As203 plus TACE versus TACE alone for unresectable PLC. The primary end points included objective response rate (ORR), karnofsky performance score (KPS) improvement rate, and 1-year survival rate. The second end points were adverse events consisting of leukopenia, liver dysfunction, nausea/vomiting, fever, myelosuppression and pain. Our study showed that, compared with TACE alone, As203 plus TACE appeared a significant benefit on ORR (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.15,1.50, P < 0.0001), KPS improvement rate (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.03,1.48, P = 0.02) and 1-year survival rate (RR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.15,1.49, P < 0.0001). Additionally, no remarkable difference of adverse events were observed between two arms: leukopenia (RR = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.90,2.32, P = 0.13), liver dysfunction (RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.76,1.21, P = 0.71), nausea/vomiting (RR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.84,1.44, P = 0.48), fever (RR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.82,1.61, P = 0.43), myelosuppression (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.74,1.56, P = 0.72) and pain (RR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.57,1.36, P = 0.57). This study demonstrated that As203 plus TACE produced a favorable efficacy without enhancing adverse events and was a promising combination therapy option for unresectable PLC. Creative Commons Attribution LicenseEntities:
Keywords: primary liver cancer; As203; TACE; meta-analysis
Year: 2017 PMID: 29072394 PMCID: PMC5747392 DOI: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.10.2695
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ISSN: 1513-7368
Figure 1Bias Risk and Quality Assessment of Included Studies
Figure 2The Funnel Plot of Objective Response Rate
Figure 3Flowchart for Study Selection
The Characteristic of the Studies in the Meta-Analysis
| Study ID | Study types | Methods | Patients | Man/Female | Median/Mean age | Child-Pugh A% | AFP+% | ORR% | 1-year survival rate | KPS improvement rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cui et al.2005 | E | TACE+As203 | 9 | 6/3 | 39(22-57) | 88.89 | 88.89 | 55.56 | NA | 55.56 |
| C | TACE | 30 | 26/4 | 45(20-68) | 83.33 | 83.33 | 20 | NA | 20 | |
| Cui et al.2006 | E | TACE+As203 | 26 | 21/5 | 52±13 | 73.08 | 73.08 | 34.62 | 80.77 | NA |
| C | TACE | 29 | 25/4 | 52±15 | 75.86 | 68.97 | 31.03 | 51.72 | NA | |
| He et al.2015 | E | TACE+As203 | 36 | 22/14 | 58.1±4.5 | 61.11 | NA | 61.11 | 77.78 | NA |
| C | TACE | 36 | 25/11 | (28-81) | 52.78 | NA | 36.11 | 55.56 | NA | |
| Hou et al.2015 | E | TACE+As203 | 63 | 35/28 | 56.5±3.8 | NA | NA | 74.6 | NA | NA |
| C | TACE | 63 | 33/30 | 54.5±3.5 | NA | NA | 39.68 | NA | NA | |
| Hu et al.2014 | E | TACE+As203 | 28 | 21/7 | 59(31-80) | NA | 100 | 64.29 | 67.86 | 50 |
| C | TACE | 25 | 17/8 | 51(28-70) | NA | 100 | 52 | 40 | 52 | |
| Nian et al.2015 | E | TACE+As203 | 81 | 96/60 | 57.6(45-76) | NA | NA | NA | 76.54 | NA |
| C | TACE | 75 | NA | NA | NA | 68 | NA | |||
| Qian 2014 | E | TACE+As203 | 40 | 32/8 | 52(33-81) | NA | 82.5 | 57.5 | NA | 72.5 |
| C | TACE | 40 | 35/5 | 50(31-68) | NA | 87.5 | 47.5 | NA | 57.5 | |
| Tang et al.2006 | E | TACE+As203 | 26 | 21/5 | 39(22-57) | 73.07 | 73.08 | 34.62 | 80.77 | 34.62 |
| C | TACE | 30 | 26/4 | 45(20-68) | 83.33 | 83.33 | 20 | 51.72 | 20 | |
| Xing 2012 | E | TACE+As203 | 23 | 18/5 | 55.43±10.49 | 78.26 | NA | 52.17 | 80.3 | NA |
| C | TACE | 25 | 23/2 | 54.84±8.24 | 84 | NA | 52 | 51.4 | NA | |
| Xie et al.2007 | E | TACE+As203 | 33 | 25/8 | 52(21-70) | NA | 72.73 | 51.52 | NA | 60.61 |
| C | TACE | 32 | 23/9 | 51(21-70) | NA | 68.75 | 43.75 | NA | 53.13 | |
| Yan et al.2013 | E | TACE+As203 | 30 | 26/4 | 52(29-72) | 83.33 | 56.67 | 20 | 46 | 50 |
| C | TACE | 32 | 26/6 | 53(31-74) | 81.25 | 56.25 | 15.63 | 52 | 43.75 | |
| Zhang et al.2010 | E | TACE+As203 | 30 | 24/6 | 52(28-72) | NA | NA | 60 | NA | 66.67 |
| C | TACE | 30 | 25/5 | 50(31-68) | NA | NA | 46.67 | NA | 56.67 | |
| Zhou et al.2007 | E | TACE+As203 | 41 | 35/6 | 51(27-75) | 85.37 | 63.41 | 14.63 | NA | NA |
| C | TACE | 45 | 40/5 | 50(23-74) | 82.22 | 75.56 | 8.89 | NA | NA | |
| Zhuang et al.2006 | E | TACE+As203 | 62 | 44/18 | (26-76) | 45.16 | 74.19 | 77.42 | 61.29 | NA |
| C | TACE | 56 | 36/20 | (24-79) | 44.64 | 75 | 78.57 | 39.29 | NA |
C, control group; E, experiment group; NA, not available; TACE, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; As203, arsenic trioxide; ORR, objective response rate; AFP+%: AFP positive rate
Figure 4Objective Response Rate of the Study
Figure 5KPS Improvement Rate of the Study
Figure 6One-Year Survival Rate of the Study
Adverse Events
| Types of adverse events | Included trials | Experiment group | Control group | Statistical model | Heterogeneity test | Meta-analysis result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n/N | n/N | I2 | p | RR(95% CI) | P | |||
| Leukopenia | 4 | 33/134 | 24/141 | fixed effect model | 35% | 0.2 | 1.44(0.90,2.32) | 0.13 |
| Liver dysfunction | 6 | 115/248 | 130/247 | random effects model | 75% | 0.001 | 0.96(0.76,1.21) | 0.71 |
| Nausea/vomiting | 5 | 62/152 | 57/155 | fixed effect model | 0% | 0.71 | 1.10(0.84,1.44) | 0.48 |
| Fever | 4 | 47/129 | 41/130 | fixed effect model | 0% | 0.84 | 1.15(0.82,1.61) | 0.43 |
| Myelosuppression | 3 | 32/150 | 29/143 | fixed effect model | 40% | 0.19 | 1.07(0.74,1.56) | 0.72 |
| Pain | 6 | 84/233 | 89/230 | fixed effect model | 0% | 0.54 | 0.88(0.57,1.36) | 0.57 |
N, the total number of patients; n, the total number of events.