| Literature DB >> 33273856 |
Shugao Han1, Yao Ye2, Jianjun Wu1, Bin Li1, Guangqiang Zhang1, Kai Jin1, Rui Tang1, Wei Huang1, Ming Chao1, Kefeng Ding2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the value of serum procalcitonin (PCT) levels in the diagnosis of abscess and sepsis following transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) therapy among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, a retrospective review of patient charts was performed in 2221 patients who suffered from hepatocellular carcinoma and had undergone 8656 TACE procedures from January 2012 to January 2018. According to the diagnosis of infection and abscess after TACE, these participants were divided into infection group (group A, n=48) and abscess group (group B, n=35). Group B included subgroup B1 (suffered from liver abscess but no sepsis, n=16) and subgroup B2 (suffered from liver abscess and sepsis, n=19). The main observational indexes included sociodemographic characteristics and laboratory and clinical parameters.Entities:
Keywords: C-reactive protein; abscess; hepatocellular carcinoma; procalcitonin; sepsis; transarterial chemoembolization
Year: 2020 PMID: 33273856 PMCID: PMC7705265 DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S281667
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Manag Res ISSN: 1179-1322 Impact factor: 3.602
Characteristics of the Two Groups of Patients (P<0.05)
| Characteristic | Group A | P | Group B | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Group B | Subgroup B1 | Subgroup B2 | |||
| 48 | 35 | 16 | 19 | |||
| 60.5 ± 12.5 | 60.3 ± 14.6 | 0.953 | 63.4 ± 11.3 | 57.8 ± 16.7 | 0.264 | |
| 0.101 | 0.782 | |||||
| Men | 46 | 30 | 14 | 16 | ||
| Women | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | ||
| 9.4 ± 4.2 | 10.1 ± 5.1 | 0.495 | 11.2 ± 5.7 | 9.2 ± 4.4 | 0.258 | |
| 0.995 | 0.047 | |||||
| No | 37 | 27 | 15 | 12 | ||
| Yes | 11 | 8 | 1 | 7 | ||
| 0.567 | 0.493 | |||||
| No | 30 | 24 | 12 | 12 | ||
| Yes | 18 | 11 | 4 | 7 | ||
| 1 (1–2) | 1 (1–2) | 0.862 | 1 (1–3) | 1 (1–2) | 0.883 | |
| 0.119 | 0.502 | |||||
| A | 1 | – | – | – | ||
| B | 16 | 7 | 2 | 5 | ||
| C | 31 | 28 | 14 | 14 | ||
| 1.43 (0.76–3.77) | 4.41 (1.12–8.21) | 0.029 | 1.16 (0.49–2.61) | 7.42 (5.44–15.04) | <0.001 | |
| 75.2 (48.0–177.1) | 149.0 (84.0–191.0) | 0.038 | 145.5 (74.6–163.8) | 149 (85.1–214.0) | 0.286 | |
| 7.0 (5.5–9.9) | 9.0 (4.6–13.8) | 0.218 | 10.1 (3.5–13.7) | 9.0 (6.0–16.5) | 0.502 | |
| 6.7 (4.7–9.1) | 8.7 (5.7–11.6) | 0.108 | 7.3 (4.0–10.9) | 10.5 (6.4–15.1) | 0.193 | |
| 87.4 (82.5–91.7) | 90.4 (85.0–92.2) | 0.22 | 88.5 (81.4–91.9) | 91.5 (86.8–92.2) | 0.161 | |
Figure 1Diagnostic efficacies of abscess formation were determined by comparing the areas under the curves (AUC).
Figure 2Diagnostic efficacies of sepsis were determined by comparing the areas under the curves (AUC).