Literature DB >> 17225260

Changes in cancer worry associated with participation in ovarian cancer screening.

M Robyn Andersen1, Charles W Drescher, Yingye Zheng, Deborah J Bowen, Susan Wilson, Alicia Young, Martin McIntosh, Barry S Mahony, Kimberly A Lowe, Nicole Urban.   

Abstract

While ovarian cancer is rare and screening is not recommended for most women, it is being studied as a way to reduce ovarian cancer mortality. As effective strategies for screening emerge it will be important to understand the quality of life (QOL) effects of participation in ovarian cancer screening. In this study, we examined the effects of participation in an ovarian cancer screening program on worry about cancer risk and QOL. A randomized controlled clinical trial (n = 592) was conducted. Women without a family history suggestive of a BRCA1/2 mutation were randomly assigned to screening and risk counseling, separately and in combination. Results were compared to women randomized to usual care alone. Levels of cancer worry fell for all study groups and QOL was unaffected; no statistically significant differences were found between groups. Increased levels of worry about ovarian cancer at 2-year follow-up were found among participants in screening receiving abnormal test results. For those who receive abnormal results, screening may have long-term effects and increase worry about cancer risk. Further research will be required to examine the possibility that screening reduces worry when women receive only normal, presumably reassuring, results. Copyright 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17225260     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  18 in total

1.  Cancer Risk Awareness and Concern among Women with a Family History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  M Robyn Andersen; Jason Thorpe; Diana S M Buist; J David Beatty; Kate Watabayashi; Nancy Hanson; Robert Resta; Jessica Chubak; Nicole Urban
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.104

2.  Pancreatic cancer risk counselling and screening: impact on perceived risk and psychological functioning.

Authors:  Christine Maheu; Andrea Vodermaier; Heidi Rothenmund; Steve Gallinger; Paola Ardiles; Kara Semotiuk; Spring Holter; Saumea Thayalan; Mary Jane Esplen
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Do the benefits outweigh the side effects of colorectal cancer surveillance? A systematic review.

Authors:  Knut Magne Augestad; Johnie Rose; Benjamin Crawshaw; Gregory Cooper; Conor Delaney
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-05-15

4.  Demographic, clinical, dispositional, and social-environmental characteristics associated with psychological response to a false positive ovarian cancer screening test: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Amanda T Wiggins; Edward J Pavlik; Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-10-25

5.  Dispositional cancer worry: convergent, divergent, and predictive validity of existing scales.

Authors:  Jakob D Jensen; Jennifer K Bernat; LaShara A Davis; Robert Yale
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2010

6.  Effects of Demographics and OTC Analgesics on Ovarian Cancer Symptoms.

Authors:  Kimberly A Lowe; M Robyn Andersen; Jeannette C Kane; Marissa D Robertson; Barbara A Goff
Journal:  J Nurse Pract       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.767

7.  Response to an abnormal ovarian cancer-screening test result: test of the social cognitive processing and cognitive social health information processing models.

Authors:  Michael A Andrykowski; Edward J Pavlik
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2010-04-21

8.  Affective, cognitive and behavioral outcomes associated with a false positive ovarian cancer screening test result.

Authors:  Amanda T Wiggins; Edward J Pavlik; Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-04-21

9.  Use of yeast-secreted in vivo biotinylated recombinant antibodies (Biobodies) in bead-based ELISA.

Authors:  Nathalie Scholler; Kimberly A Lowe; Lindsay A Bergan; Archana V Kampani; Vivian Ng; Robin M Forrest; Jason D Thorpe; Jenny A Gross; Barbara M Garvik; Ronny Drapkin; Garnet L Anderson; Nicole Urban
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  Emotional impact of screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ruth E Collins; Laureen M Lopez; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.