Literature DB >> 29071652

Detecting treatment-subgroup interactions in clustered data with generalized linear mixed-effects model trees.

M Fokkema1, N Smits2, A Zeileis3, T Hothorn4, H Kelderman5.   

Abstract

Identification of subgroups of patients for whom treatment A is more effective than treatment B, and vice versa, is of key importance to the development of personalized medicine. Tree-based algorithms are helpful tools for the detection of such interactions, but none of the available algorithms allow for taking into account clustered or nested dataset structures, which are particularly common in psychological research. Therefore, we propose the generalized linear mixed-effects model tree (GLMM tree) algorithm, which allows for the detection of treatment-subgroup interactions, while accounting for the clustered structure of a dataset. The algorithm uses model-based recursive partitioning to detect treatment-subgroup interactions, and a GLMM to estimate the random-effects parameters. In a simulation study, GLMM trees show higher accuracy in recovering treatment-subgroup interactions, higher predictive accuracy, and lower type II error rates than linear-model-based recursive partitioning and mixed-effects regression trees. Also, GLMM trees show somewhat higher predictive accuracy than linear mixed-effects models with pre-specified interaction effects, on average. We illustrate the application of GLMM trees on an individual patient-level data meta-analysis on treatments for depression. We conclude that GLMM trees are a promising exploratory tool for the detection of treatment-subgroup interactions in clustered datasets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification and regression trees; Mixed-effects models; Model-based recursive partitioning; Treatment-subgroup interactions

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29071652     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0971-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  2 in total

1.  Subgroup identification based on differential effect search--a recursive partitioning method for establishing response to treatment in patient subpopulations.

Authors:  Ilya Lipkovich; Alex Dmitrienko; Jonathan Denne; Gregory Enas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Model-Based Recursive Partitioning for Subgroup Analyses.

Authors:  Heidi Seibold; Achim Zeileis; Torsten Hothorn
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 0.968

  2 in total
  21 in total

1.  Detecting Heterogeneity of Intervention Effects in Comparative Judgments.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wiedermann; Ulrich Frick; Edgar C Merkle
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2021-03-09

2.  Exclusion in the field: wild brown skuas find hidden food in the absence of visual information.

Authors:  Samara Danel; Jules Chiffard-Carricaburu; Francesco Bonadonna; Anna P Nesterova
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Regression Trees for Longitudinal Data with Baseline Covariates.

Authors:  Madan Gopal Kundu; Jaroslaw Harezlak
Journal:  Biostat Epidemiol       Date:  2018-12-31

4.  Network Trees: A Method for Recursively Partitioning Covariance Structures.

Authors:  Payton J Jones; Patrick Mair; Thorsten Simon; Achim Zeileis
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  [Subgroup identification based on the Logistic model].

Authors:  Yanhong Zhang; Xueyuan Li; Zhijian Wang; Shengli An
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-12-30

6.  BiMM forest: A random forest method for modeling clustered and longitudinal binary outcomes.

Authors:  Jaime Lynn Speiser; Bethany J Wolf; Dongjun Chung; Constantine J Karvellas; David G Koch; Valerie L Durkalski
Journal:  Chemometr Intell Lab Syst       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.491

7.  A random forest method with feature selection for developing medical prediction models with clustered and longitudinal data.

Authors:  Jaime Lynn Speiser
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 6.317

8.  SDT: A Tree Method for Detecting Patient Subgroups with Personalized Risk Factors.

Authors:  Xiangrui Li; Dongxiao Zhu; Ming Dong; Milad Zafar Nezhad; Alexander Janke; Phillip D Levy
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2017-07-26

9.  Which patients benefit specifically from short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) for depression? Study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.

Authors:  Ellen Driessen; Allan A Abbass; Jacques P Barber; Mary Beth Connolly Gibbons; Jack J M Dekker; Marjolein Fokkema; Peter Fonagy; Steven D Hollon; Elise P Jansma; Saskia C M de Maat; Joel M Town; Jos W R Twisk; Henricus L Van; Erica Weitz; Pim Cuijpers
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Revealing Dissociable Attention Biases in Chronic Smokers Through an Individual-Differences Approach.

Authors:  Chiara Della Libera; Thomas Zandonai; Lorenzo Zamboni; Elisa Santandrea; Marco Sandri; Fabio Lugoboni; Cristiano Chiamulera; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.