Literature DB >> 29071592

Detection and Segmentation of Pectoral Muscle on MLO-View Mammogram Using Enhancement Filter.

P S Vikhe1, V R Thool2.   

Abstract

The presence of predominant density region of the pectoral muscle in Medio-Lateral Oblique (MLO) view of the mammograms can affect or bias the results of mammograms processing for breast cancer detection using intensity based methods. Therefore, to improve the diagnostic performance of breast cancer detection using computer-aided system, identification and segmentation of pectoral muscle is an important task. This paper presents, an intensity based approach to identify the pectoral region in mammograms. In the presented approach enhancement mask and threshold technique is used to enhance and select the pectoral region and boundary points respectively, to find the boundary of pectoral muscle. Then curve fitting by Least Square Error (LSE) method is used to refine the rough initial boundaries. The proposed approach was applied on 320 mammograms from mini-Mammographic Image Analysis Society (mini-MIAS) database of 322 mammograms, with acceptable rate of 96.56% from radiologist experts. The performance evaluation for pectoral muscle segmentation, based on Hausdorff distance (H d ), False Positive (FP) and False Negative (FN) rate, shows the usefulness and effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Detection; Enhancement mask; Mammograms; Pectoral muscle; Segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29071592     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-017-0839-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  10 in total

1.  Automatic pectoral muscle segmentation on mediolateral oblique view mammograms.

Authors:  Sze Man Kwok; Ramachandran Chandrasekhar; Yianni Attikiouzel; Mary T Rickard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Automatic detection of pectoral muscle using average gradient and shape based feature.

Authors:  Jayasree Chakraborty; Sudipta Mukhopadhyay; Veenu Singla; Niranjan Khandelwal; Pinakpani Bhattacharyya
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Robust Automatic Pectoral Muscle Segmentation from Mammograms Using Texture Gradient and Euclidean Distance Regression.

Authors:  Vibha Bafna Bora; Ashwin G Kothari; Avinash G Keskar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Mass Detection in Mammographic Images Using Wavelet Processing and Adaptive Threshold Technique.

Authors:  P S Vikhe; V R Thool
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 5.  Pectoral muscle segmentation: a review.

Authors:  Karthikeyan Ganesan; U Rajendra Acharya; Kuang Chua Chua; Lim Choo Min; K Thomas Abraham
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 6.  Computer-aided breast cancer detection using mammograms: a review.

Authors:  Karthikeyan Ganesan; U Rajendra Acharya; Chua Kuang Chua; Lim Choo Min; K Thomas Abraham; Kwan-Hoong Ng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-12-11

7.  Pectoral muscle detection in mammograms using local statistical features.

Authors:  Li Liu; Qian Liu; Wei Lu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Shape-based Automatic Detection of Pectoral Muscle Boundary in Mammograms.

Authors:  Chunxiao Chen; Gao Liu; Jing Wang; Gail Sudlow
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 1.553

Review 9.  Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with mammography: recent advances.

Authors:  Jinshan Tang; Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Jun Xu; Issam El Naqa; Yongyi Yang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2009-01-20

10.  Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms.

Authors:  R J Ferrari; R M Rangayyan; J E L Desautels; R A Borges; A F Frère
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.048

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.