Literature DB >> 29070412

The Screening Compound Collection: A Key Asset for Drug Discovery.

Christoph Boss1, Julien Hazemann2, Thierry Kimmerlin2, Modest von Korff2, Urs Lüthi2, Oliver Peter2, Thomas Sander2, Romain Siegrist2.   

Abstract

In this case study on an essential instrument of modern drug discovery, we summarize our successful efforts in the last four years toward enhancing the Actelion screening compound collection. A key organizational step was the establishment of the Compound Library Committee (CLC) in September 2013. This cross-functional team consisting of computational scientists, medicinal chemists and a biologist was endowed with a significant annual budget for regular new compound purchases. Based on an initial library analysis performed in 2013, the CLC developed a New Library Strategy. The established continuous library turn-over mode, and the screening library size of 300'000 compounds were maintained, while the structural library quality was increased. This was achieved by shifting the selection criteria from 'druglike' to 'leadlike' structures, enriching for non-flat structures, aiming for compound novelty, and increasing the ratio of higher cost 'Premium Compounds'. Novel chemical space was gained by adding natural compounds, macrocycles, designed and focused libraries to the collection, and through mutual exchanges of proprietary compounds with agrochemical companies. A comparative analysis in 2016 provided evidence for the positive impact of these measures. Screening the improved library has provided several highly promising hits, including a macrocyclic compound, that are currently followed up in different Hit-to-Lead and Lead Optimization programs. It is important to state that the goal of the CLC was not to achieve higher HTS hit rates, but to increase the chances of identified hits to serve as the basis of successful early drug discovery programs. The experience gathered so far legitimates the New Library Strategy.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29070412     DOI: 10.2533/chimia.2017.667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chimia (Aarau)        ISSN: 0009-4293            Impact factor:   1.509


  6 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating and evolving a screening library in academia: the St Jude approach.

Authors:  Gisele Nishiguchi; Sourav Das; Jason Ochoada; Heather Long; Richard E Lee; Zoran Rankovic; Anang A Shelat
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 2.  Unraveling Plant Natural Chemical Diversity for Drug Discovery Purposes.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Lautié; Olivier Russo; Pierre Ducrot; Jean A Boutin
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  Identification of anti-schistosomal, anthelmintic and anti-parasitic compounds curated and text-mined from the scientific literature.

Authors:  Avril Coghlan; Gilda Padalino; Noel M O'Boyle; Karl F Hoffmann; Matthew Berriman
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2022-07-19

4.  Screening of Big Pharma's Library against Various in-house Biological Targets.

Authors:  Damijan Knez; Stanislav Gobec; Martina Hrast
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.927

5.  Novel computational models offer alternatives to animal testing for assessing eye irritation and corrosion potential of chemicals.

Authors:  Arthur C Silva; Joyce V V B Borba; Vinicius M Alves; Steven U S Hall; Nicholas Furnham; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Eugene Muratov; Alexander Tropsha; Carolina Horta Andrade
Journal:  Artif Intell Life Sci       Date:  2021-12-05

6.  Complex Carbocyclic Skeletons from Aryl Ketones through a Three-Photon Cascade Reaction.

Authors:  Line Naesborg; Christian Jandl; Andreas Zech; Thorsten Bach
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 15.336

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.