Soo-Jin Park1, Seung-Jin Lee1, So-Yeon Nam1, Dong-Soon Im1. 1. Molecular Inflammation Research Center for Aging Intervention (MRCA) and College of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: GPR35 has long been considered an orphan GPCR, because no endogenous ligand of GPR35 has been discovered. CXCL17 (a chemokine) has been reported to be an endogenous ligand of GPR35, and it has even been suggested that it be called CXCR8. However, at present there is no supporting evidence that CXCL17 does interact with GPR35. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We applied two assay systems to explore the relationship between CXCL17 and GPR35. An AP-TGF-α shedding assay in GPR35 over-expressing HEK293 cells was used as a gain-of-function assay. GPR35 knock-down by siRNA transfection was performed in endogenously GPR35-expressing THP-1 cells. KEY RESULTS: In the AP-TGF-α shedding assay, lodoxamide, a well-known synthetic GPR35 agonist, was confirmed to be the most potent agonist among other reported agonists. However, neither human nor mouse CXCL17 had an effect on GPR35. Consistent with previous findings, G proteins Gαi/o and Gα12/13 were found to couple with GPR35. Furthermore, lodoxamide-induced activation of GPR35 was concentration-dependently inhibited by CID2745687 (a selective GPR35 antagonist). In endogenously GPR35-expressing THP-1 cells, lodoxamide concentration-dependently inhibited migration and this inhibitory effect was blocked by CID2745687 treatment or GPR35 siRNA transfection. However, even though CXCL17 stimulated the migration of THP-1 cells, which is consistent with a previous report, this stimulatory effect of CXCL17 was not blocked by CID2745687 or GPR35 siRNA. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The present findings suggest that GPR35 functions as a migration inhibitory receptor, but CXCL17-stimulated migration of THP-1 cells is not dependent on GPR35.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:GPR35 has long been considered an orphan GPCR, because no endogenous ligand of GPR35 has been discovered. CXCL17 (a chemokine) has been reported to be an endogenous ligand of GPR35, and it has even been suggested that it be called CXCR8. However, at present there is no supporting evidence that CXCL17 does interact with GPR35. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We applied two assay systems to explore the relationship between CXCL17 and GPR35. An AP-TGF-α shedding assay in GPR35 over-expressing HEK293 cells was used as a gain-of-function assay. GPR35 knock-down by siRNA transfection was performed in endogenously GPR35-expressing THP-1 cells. KEY RESULTS: In the AP-TGF-α shedding assay, lodoxamide, a well-known synthetic GPR35 agonist, was confirmed to be the most potent agonist among other reported agonists. However, neither human nor mouseCXCL17 had an effect on GPR35. Consistent with previous findings, G proteins Gαi/o and Gα12/13 were found to couple with GPR35. Furthermore, lodoxamide-induced activation of GPR35 was concentration-dependently inhibited by CID2745687 (a selective GPR35 antagonist). In endogenously GPR35-expressing THP-1 cells, lodoxamide concentration-dependently inhibited migration and this inhibitory effect was blocked by CID2745687 treatment or GPR35 siRNA transfection. However, even though CXCL17 stimulated the migration of THP-1 cells, which is consistent with a previous report, this stimulatory effect of CXCL17 was not blocked by CID2745687 or GPR35 siRNA. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The present findings suggest that GPR35 functions as a migration inhibitory receptor, but CXCL17-stimulated migration of THP-1 cells is not dependent on GPR35.
Authors: Pingwei Zhao; Haleli Sharir; Ankur Kapur; Alan Cowan; Ellen B Geller; Martin W Adler; Herbert H Seltzman; Patricia H Reggio; Susanne Heynen-Genel; Michelle Sauer; Thomas D Y Chung; Yushi Bai; Wei Chen; Marc G Caron; Larry S Barak; Mary E Abood Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2010-07-22 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Craig Southern; Jennifer M Cook; Zaynab Neetoo-Isseljee; Debra L Taylor; Catherine A Kettleborough; Andy Merritt; Daniel L Bassoni; William J Raab; Elizabeth Quinn; Tom S Wehrman; Anthony P Davenport; Andrew J Brown; Andrew Green; Mark J Wigglesworth; Steve Rees Journal: J Biomol Screen Date: 2013-02-08
Authors: Georg Schneditz; Joshua E Elias; Ester Pagano; M Zaeem Cader; Svetlana Saveljeva; Kathleen Long; Subhankar Mukhopadhyay; Maryam Arasteh; Trevor D Lawley; Gordon Dougan; Andrew Bassett; Tom H Karlsen; Arthur Kaser; Nicole C Kaneider Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: Nurul A S Binti Mohd Amir; Amanda E Mackenzie; Laura Jenkins; Karim Boustani; Marston C Hillier; Tomoko Tsuchiya; Graeme Milligan; James E Pease Journal: J Immunol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Amanda E Mackenzie; Tezz Quon; Li-Chiung Lin; Alexander S Hauser; Laura Jenkins; Asuka Inoue; Andrew B Tobin; David E Gloriam; Brian D Hudson; Graeme Milligan Journal: FASEB J Date: 2019-01-02 Impact factor: 5.191