Literature DB >> 29068039

Respiratory, cardiovascular and metabolic responses during different modes of overground bionic ambulation in persons with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury: A case series.

Jochen Kressler1, Tracie Wymer, Antoinette Domingo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of overground bionic ambulation with variable assistance on cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses in persons with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury.
DESIGN: Case series.
SUBJECTS: Four participants with chronic, motor-incomplete spinal cord injury.
METHODS: Subjects completed a maximal graded exercise test on an arm-ergometer and 3 6-min bouts of overground bionic ambulation using different modes of assistance, i.e. Maximal, Adaptive, Fixed. Cardiorespiratory (oxygen consumption) and metabolic (caloric expenditure and substrate utilization) measures were taken using a mobile metabolic cart at each overground bionic ambulation assistance.
RESULTS: Cardiorespiratory responses ranged from low (24% VO2peak) for the least impaired and fittest individual to supramaximal (124% VO2peak) for the participant with the largest impairments and the lowest level of fitness. Different overground bionic ambulation assistive modes elicited small (3-8% VO2peak) differences in cardiorespiratory responses for 3 participants. One participant had a large (28% VO2peak) difference in cardiorespiratory responses to different modes of overground bionic ambulation. Metabolic responses mostly tracked closely with cardiorespiratory responses. Total energy expenditure ranged from 1.39 to 7.17 kcal/min. Fat oxidation ranged from 0.00 to 0.17 g/min across participants and different overground bionic ambulation modes.
CONCLUSION: Overground bionic ambulation with variable assistance can substantially increase cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses; however, these responses vary widely across participants and overground bionic ambulation modes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29068039     DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1650-1977            Impact factor:   2.912


  10 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Rehabilitation and Spinal Cord Injury: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Marwa Mekki; Andrew D Delgado; Adam Fry; David Putrino; Vincent Huang
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Wearable powered exoskeletons for gait training in tetraplegia: a systematic review on feasibility, safety and potential health benefits.

Authors:  Gonzalo Rodriguez Tapia; Ioannis Doumas; Thierry Lejeune; Jean-Gabriel Previnaire
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 2.471

3.  An Assessment of Which Sociodemographic and Spinal Cord Injury-Specific Characteristics Influence Engagement With Experimental Therapies and Participation in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Carlotta Pazzi; Clara Farrehi; Maclain Capron; Kim Anderson; Bonnie Richardson; Michael Stillman
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2021-11-17

4.  The Cardiorespiratory Demands of Treadmill Walking with and without the Use of Ekso GT™ within Able-Bodied Participants: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Damien Duddy; Rónán Doherty; James Connolly; Johnny Loughrey; Joan Condell; David Hassan; Maria Faulkner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Effect of Joint Friction Compensation on a "Muscle-First" Motor-Assisted Hybrid Neuroprosthesis.

Authors:  Ryan-David Reyes; Rudolf Kobetic; Mark Nandor; Nathaniel Makowski; Musa Audu; Roger Quinn; Ronald Triolo
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Knowledge Gaps in Biophysical Changes After Powered Robotic Exoskeleton Walking by Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Christopher C H Yip; Chor-Yin Lam; Kenneth M C Cheung; Yat Wa Wong; Paul A Koljonen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Outcomes of Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Treated by Surgery and Their Prognostic Factors.

Authors:  Xinfeng Wu; Qingpeng Song; Peihao Jin; Bo Liu
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 1.781

8.  Closed-Loop Torque and Kinematic Control of a Hybrid Lower-Limb Exoskeleton for Treadmill Walking.

Authors:  Chen-Hao Chang; Jonathan Casas; Steven W Brose; Victor H Duenas
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-01-20

9.  Stroke survivor perceptions of using an exoskeleton during acute gait rehabilitation.

Authors:  Caitlin McDonald; Caitriona Fingleton; Sean Murphy; Olive Lennon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 10.  The Effects of Powered Exoskeleton Gait Training on Cardiovascular Function and Gait Performance: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Damien Duddy; Rónán Doherty; James Connolly; Stephen McNally; Johnny Loughrey; Maria Faulkner
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.