Literature DB >> 29067570

An Efficient Pipeline for Abdomen Segmentation in CT Images.

Hasan Koyuncu1, Rahime Ceylan2, Mesut Sivri3, Hasan Erdogan4.   

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) scans usually include some disadvantages due to the nature of the imaging procedure, and these handicaps prevent accurate abdomen segmentation. Discontinuous abdomen edges, bed section of CT, patient information, closeness between the edges of the abdomen and CT, poor contrast, and a narrow histogram can be regarded as the most important handicaps that occur in abdominal CT scans. Currently, one or more handicaps can arise and prevent technicians obtaining abdomen images through simple segmentation techniques. In other words, CT scans can include the bed section of CT, a patient's diagnostic information, low-quality abdomen edges, low-level contrast, and narrow histogram, all in one scan. These phenomena constitute a challenge, and an efficient pipeline that is unaffected by handicaps is required. In addition, analysis such as segmentation, feature selection, and classification has meaning for a real-time diagnosis system in cases where the abdomen section is directly used with a specific size. A statistical pipeline is designed in this study that is unaffected by the handicaps mentioned above. Intensity-based approaches, morphological processes, and histogram-based procedures are utilized to design an efficient structure. Performance evaluation is realized in experiments on 58 CT images (16 training, 16 test, and 26 validation) that include the abdomen and one or more disadvantage(s). The first part of the data (16 training images) is used to detect the pipeline's optimum parameters, while the second and third parts are utilized to evaluate and to confirm the segmentation performance. The segmentation results are presented as the means of six performance metrics. Thus, the proposed method achieves remarkable average rates for training/test/validation of 98.95/99.36/99.57% (jaccard), 99.47/99.67/99.79% (dice), 100/99.91/99.91% (sensitivity), 98.47/99.23/99.85% (specificity), 99.38/99.63/99.87% (classification accuracy), and 98.98/99.45/99.66% (precision). In summary, a statistical pipeline performing the task of abdomen segmentation is achieved that is not affected by the disadvantages, and the most detailed abdomen segmentation study is performed for the use before organ and tumor segmentation, feature extraction, and classification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdomen segmentation; Computed tomography; Edge detection; Image registration; Statistical pipeline

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29067570      PMCID: PMC5873470          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-017-0032-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  10 in total

1.  Abdominal organ segmentation using texture transforms and a Hopfield neural network.

Authors:  J E Koss; F D Newman; T K Johnson; D L Kirch
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Fuzzy c-means clustering with spatial information for image segmentation.

Authors:  Keh-Shih Chuang; Hong-Long Tzeng; Sharon Chen; Jay Wu; Tzong-Jer Chen
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Multiple abdominal organ segmentation: an atlas-based fuzzy connectedness approach.

Authors:  Yongxin Zhou; Jing Bai
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2007-05

4.  Efficient multi-atlas abdominal segmentation on clinically acquired CT with SIMPLE context learning.

Authors:  Zhoubing Xu; Ryan P Burke; Christopher P Lee; Rebeccah B Baucom; Benjamin K Poulose; Richard G Abramson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Contour-Driven Atlas-Based Segmentation.

Authors:  Christian Wachinger; Karl Fritscher; Greg Sharp; Polina Golland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Abdomen and spinal cord segmentation with augmented active shape models.

Authors:  Zhoubing Xu; Benjamin N Conrad; Rebeccah B Baucom; Seth A Smith; Benjamin K Poulose; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-08-26

7.  Elimination of white Gaussian noise in arterial phase CT images to bring adrenal tumours into the forefront.

Authors:  Hasan Koyuncu; Rahime Ceylan
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2017-06-04       Impact factor: 4.790

8.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository.

Authors:  Kenneth Clark; Bruce Vendt; Kirk Smith; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Paul Koppel; Stephen Moore; Stanley Phillips; David Maffitt; Michael Pringle; Lawrence Tarbox; Fred Prior
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Landmarking and segmentation of computed tomographic images of pediatric patients with neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Shantanu Banik; Graham S Boag
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Pixel-Level Deep Segmentation: Artificial Intelligence Quantifies Muscle on Computed Tomography for Body Morphometric Analysis.

Authors:  Hyunkwang Lee; Fabian M Troschel; Shahein Tajmir; Georg Fuchs; Julia Mario; Florian J Fintelmann; Synho Do
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.056

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Machine Learning for Automatic Paraspinous Muscle Area and Attenuation Measures on Low-Dose Chest CT Scans.

Authors:  Ryan Barnard; Josh Tan; Brandon Roller; Caroline Chiles; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Leon Lenchik
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.173

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.