| Literature DB >> 29067213 |
Tamara L Grubb1,2, David E Anderson1,3.
Abstract
The placement and accuracy of pulse oximeter probes can vary markedly among species. For our study, we aimed to assess the accuracy of pulse oximetry and to determine the most clinically useful sites for probe placement in llamas and alpacas. The objectives included an analysis of pulse oximetry probes for accurate assessment of llamas and alpacas and to determine the best placement of the probes to achieve accurate readings. For study 1, saturation of haemoglobin with oxygen was measured in 184 arterial blood gas samples (SaO2) using a co-oximeter and compared to saturation of haemoglobin with oxygen simultaneously measured using a pulse oximeter (SpO2). The bias and precision for the SpO2-SaO2 difference was calculated and plotted on a Bland-Altman plot. For study 2, SpO2 data was collected 624 times from a variety of sites [tongue (T), nasal septum (NS), lip (L), vulva (V), prepuce (P), ear (E), and scrotum (S)] and recorded based upon a percentage of successful readings. Results for study 1 revealed that SpO2 was consistently 0 to -6% points different than SaO2. The bias and precision of the SpO2-SaO2 difference was -2.6 ± 1.7%. Results for study 2 uncovered that 540 recordings were successful readings and were obtained from the tongue and nasal septum with 97% accuracy, the lip 80%, vulva 62%, prepuce 59%, ear and scrotum < 50%. We concluded that pulse oximetry probes provide reliable estimates of arterial haemoglobin oxygen saturation in llamas and alpacas and is most accurately read when placed on the nasal septum or tongue.Entities:
Keywords: alpaca; llama; pulse oximetry probe
Year: 2017 PMID: 29067213 PMCID: PMC5645841 DOI: 10.1002/vms3.68
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Med Sci ISSN: 2053-1095
Numbers of llamas and alpacas breathing room air with a fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2) percentage of 21% (room air) or 97% (supplemental oxygen during anaesthesia) with resultant saturation of haemoglobin with oxygen measured pulse oximetry (SpO2), saturation of haemoglobin with oxygen measured by blood gas analysis (SaO2) and the difference between the two measurements (SpO2‐SaO2)
| Species | Number | % FiO2 | Mean ± SD SpO2% | Mean ± SD SaO2% | SpO2‐SaO2% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llamas | 22 | 21 | 94.8 ± 0.2 | 98.2 ± 0.4 | −3.4 ± 0.6 |
| 38 | 97 | 99.3 ± 0.1 | 100.7 ± 0.1 | −1.4 ± 0.2 | |
| Alpacas | 6 | 21 | 95.4 ± 0.3 | 99.4 ± 0.4 | −4.0 ± 0.7 |
| 14 | 97 | 99.4 ± 0.0 | 101.0 ± 0.2 | −1.6 ± 0.2 | |
| Total: 80 |
Average: |
Average: |
Average: |
All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. There are no statistically significant differences in the data.
Figure 1Bland‐Altman Plot: Difference in saturation (SpO2 – SaO2) plotted against the mean saturation (average of SaO2 and SpO2). Light dashed line indicates mean of differences (−2.6). Heavy dashed line indicates −2 standard deviations from mean (1 SD = 1.7) of differences. The cross indicates areas where multiple data points overlap.