Literature DB >> 29066041

Accuracy of virtual surgical planning of orthognathic surgery with aid of CAD/CAM fabricated surgical splint-A novel 3D analyzing algorithm.

Shih-Jan Chin1, Frank Wilde2, Michael Neuhaus1, Alexander Schramm2, Nils-Claudius Gellrich1, Majeed Rana3.   

Abstract

The benefit of computer-assisted planning in orthognathic surgery has been extensively documented over the last decade. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of a virtual orthognathic surgical plan by a novel three dimensional (3D) analysis method. Ten patients who required orthognathic surgery were included in this study. A virtual surgical plan was achieved by the combination of a 3D skull model acquired from computed tomography (CT) and surface scanning of the upper and lower dental arch respectively and final occlusal position. Osteotomies and movement of maxilla and mandible were simulated by Dolphin Imaging 11.8 Premium® (Dolphin Imaging and Management Solutions, Chatsworth, CA). The surgical plan was transferred to surgical splints fabricated by means of Computer Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM). Differences of three dimensional measurements between the virtual surgical plan and postoperative results were evaluated. The results from all parameters showed that the virtual surgical plans were successfully transferred by the assistance of CAD/CAM fabricated surgical splint. Wilcoxon's signed rank test showed that no statistically significant deviation between surgical plan and post-operational result could be detected. However, deviation of angle U1 axis-HP and distance of A-CP could not fulfill the clinical success criteria. Virtual surgical planning and CAD/CAM fabricated surgical splint are proven to facilitate treatment planning and offer an accurate surgical result in orthognathic surgery.
Copyright © 2017 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D analyzing; CAD/CAM surgical splint; Orthognathic surgery; Virtual surgical planning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29066041     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  11 in total

1.  Laboratorial Comparative Study of the Accuracy Between Virtual Planning and Erickson's Platform.

Authors:  Maysa Nogueira de Barros Melo; Ítalo Miranda do Vale Pereira; Alexander Tadeu Sverzut; Cássio Edvard Sverzut; Alexandre Elias Trivellato
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2022-01-17

2.  Three-dimensional analysis of the velopharyngeal region in patients with cleft palate and healthy individuals.

Authors:  Simone Miller; Michael-Tobias Neuhaus; Rüdiger Zimmerer; Frank Tavassol; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Martin Ptok; Michael Jungheim
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ali Alkhayer; József Piffkó; Carsten Lippold; Emil Segatto
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 2.151

4.  Design and manufacture of dental-supported surgical guide for genioplasty.

Authors:  Li-Dong Wang; Wen Ma; Shuai Fu; Chang-Bin Zhang; Qing-Ying Cui; Can-Bang Peng; Ming Li
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 2.080

Review 5.  Additive Manufacturing Processes in Medical Applications.

Authors:  Mika Salmi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Randomized Clinical Trial of the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Implants versus CAD/CAM Splints in Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Biao Li; Hongpu Wei; Tengfei Jiang; Yifeng Qian; Tianjia Zhang; Hongbo Yu; Lei Zhang; Xudong Wang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 5.169

7.  Mechanical properties of CAD/CAM-fabricated in comparison to conventionally fabricated functional regulator 3 appliances.

Authors:  Christoph Roser; Lutz D Hodecker; Chris Koebel; Christopher J Lux; Dorothee Ruckes; Stefan Rues; Andreas Zenthöfer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The Accuracy of Jaws Repositioning in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery with Traditional Surgical Planning Compared to Digital Surgical Planning in Skeletal Class III Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Martina Barone; Alberto De Stefani; Ugo Baciliero; Giovanni Bruno; Antonio Gracco
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  CAD/CAM splint and surgical navigation allows accurate maxillary segment positioning in Le Fort I osteotomy.

Authors:  Tatsuo Shirota; Sunao Shiogama; Yusuke Asama; Motohiro Tanaka; Yuji Kurihara; Hiroshi Ogura; Takaaki Kamatani
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-07-22

Review 10.  Current status of surgery-first approach (part III): the use of 3D technology and the implication in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Junho Jung; Seung-Hwan Moon; Yong-Dae Kwon
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.