| Literature DB >> 29065924 |
Chao Zeng1, Jie Wei2,3, Robert Terkeltaub4,5, Tuo Yang1, Hyon K Choi6, Yi-Lun Wang1, Dong-Xing Xie1, David J Hunter7, Yuqing Zhang6, Hui Li1, Yang Cui8, Liang-Jun Li1,9, Guang-Hua Lei10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess serum magnesium levels in relation to prevalence of knee chondrocalcinosis in two population-based Chinese studies.Entities:
Keywords: Chondrocalcinosis; Knee; Magnesium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29065924 PMCID: PMC5655810 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-017-1450-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthritis Res Ther ISSN: 1478-6354 Impact factor: 5.156
Basic characteristics of the population in the Xiangya Hospital Health Management Center Study (n = 12,631)
| Tertiles of serum Mg (mmol/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (≤0.86) | 2 (0.87–0.91) | 3 (≥0.92) | |
| Number | 4633 | 3720 | 4278 |
| Median Mg level (mmol/L) | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.95 |
| Sex (female, %) | 45.3 | 42.5 | 40.9 |
| Age (years) | 52.1 ± 8.1 | 52.4 ± 8.1 | 52.5 ± 7.9 |
| 40–49 (%) | 43.5 | 41.1 | 39.5 |
| 50–59 (%) | 37.5 | 39.5 | 40.4 |
| 60–69 (%) | 15.2 | 15.9 | 17.2 |
| ≥70 (%) | 3.8 | 3.5 | 2.9 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.5 ± 3.4 | 24.4 ± 3.3 | 24.4 ± 3.2 |
| <25 (%) | 57.6 | 59.2 | 58.6 |
| ≥25 (%) | 42.4 | 40.8 | 41.4 |
| Serum iron (μmol/L) | 18.1 ± 6.5 | 18.4 ± 6.3 | 18.9 ± 6.5 |
| Serum ferritin (μg/L) | 78.4 ± 67.3 | 78.3 ± 68.2 | 81.5 ± 62.8 |
| Serum calcium (mmol/L) | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.1 |
| Serum zinc (μmol/L) | 13.1 ± 2.5 | 13.5 ± 2.6 | 13.7 ± 3.1 |
| Serum copper (μmol/L) | 16.1 ± 3.6 | 16.2 ± 3.4 | 16.8 ± 3.8 |
| Serum phosphorus (mmol/L) | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 |
| Education (high school or above, %) | 42.3 | 49.8 | 49.0 |
| Occupation (manual labor, %) | 20.1 | 17.2 | 17.5 |
Mg magnesium, BMI body mass index
Fig. 1Dose-response relationship between serum magnesium (Mg) level and the odds ratio (OR) for knee chondrocalcinosis (CC) in the Xiangya Hospital Health Management Center Study. CI, confidence interval
Fig. 2Association between serum magnesium (Mg) and predicted prevalence of chondrocalcinosis (CC) analyzed by spline regression in the Xiangya Hospital Health Management Center Study
Association between serum Mg and knee chondrocalcinosis in the Xiangya Hospital Health Management Center Study (n = 12,631)
| Tertiles of serum Mg (mmol/L) |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (≤0.86) | 2 (0.87–0.91) | 3 (≥0.92) | ||
| Total | ||||
|
| 9263 | 7438 | 8497 | - |
| Knee chondrocalcinosis (%) | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.6 | - |
| Model 1 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.59 (0.40, 0.87) | 0.49 (0.33, 0.72) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.59 (0.39, 0.89) | 0.53 (0.36, 0.78) | 0.001 |
| Model 3 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.69 (0.36, 1.32) | 0.38 (0.20, 0.71) | 0.002 |
| Model 4 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.60 (0.41, 0.89) | 0.48 (0.33, 0.71) | <0.001 |
| Model 5 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.58 (0.39, 0.88) | 0.52 (0.35, 0.78) | 0.001 |
| Model 6 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.57 (0.38, 0.86) | 0.49 (0.33, 0.73) | <0.001 |
| Model 7 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.60 (0.41, 0.89) | 0.48 (0.33, 0.72) | <0.001 |
| Model 8 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.83 (0.43, 1.58) | 0.46 (0.23, 0.90) | 0.021 |
| Male | ||||
|
| 5065 | 4279 | 5058 | - |
| Knee chondrocalcinosis (%) | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.5 | - |
| Model 1 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.56 (0.33, 0.95) | 0.43 (0.25, 0.74) | 0.002 |
| Model 2 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.54 (0.31, 0.96) | 0.45 (0.26, 0.78) | 0.003 |
| Model 3 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.65 (0.27, 1.56) | 0.37 (0.16, 0.84) | 0.017 |
| Model 4 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.57 (0.34, 0.98) | 0.42 (0.24, 0.73) | 0.002 |
| Model 5 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.54 (0.30, 0.94) | 0.45 (0.26, 0.78) | 0.003 |
| Model 6 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.54 (0.31, 0.94) | 0.41 (0.24, 0.72) | 0.001 |
| Model 7 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.57 (0.33, 0.98) | 0.42 (0.24, 0.73) | 0.002 |
| Model 8 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.92 (0.40, 2.11) | 0.51 (0.21, 1.24) | 0.134 |
| Female | ||||
|
| 4198 | 3159 | 3494 | - |
| Knee chondrocalcinosis (%) | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 | - |
| Model 1 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.64 (0.36, 1.13) | 0.54 (0.30, 0.96) | 0.034 |
| Model 2 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.65 (0.36, 1.19) | 0.60 (0.33, 1.09) | 0.094 |
| Model 3 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.78 (0.29, 2.13) | 0.41 (0.14, 1.21) | 0.091 |
| Model 4 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.65 (0.37, 1.15) | 0.54 (0.31, 0.96) | 0.035 |
| Model 5 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.65 (0.36, 1.18) | 0.59 (0.33, 1.07) | 0.081 |
| Model 6 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.65 (0.35, 1.19) | 0.60 (0.33, 1.10) | 0.096 |
| Model 7 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.65 (0.36, 1.14) | 0.54 (0.30, 0.96) | 0.034 |
| Model 8 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.67 (0.24, 1.88) | 0.37 (0.13, 1.12) | 0.073 |
Model 1 included age (40–49, 50–59, 60–69, ≥70 years), body mass index (BMI) (<25, ≥25 kg/m2) and sex (age and BMI for the sex subgroup) (n = 12,631)
Model 2 added serum iron (tertiles) on the basis of model 1 (n = 12,149)
Model 3 added serum ferritin (tertiles) on the basis of model 1 (n = 5113)
Model 4 added serum calcium (tertiles) on the basis of model 1 (n = 12,479)
Model 5 added serum zinc (tertiles) on the basis of model 1 (n = 12,154)
Model 6 added serum copper (tertiles) on the basis of model 1 (n = 12,153)
Model 7 added serum phosphorus (tertiles) on the basis of model 1 (n = 12490)
Model 8 added education (high school or above, lower than high school) and occupation (manual labor, non-manual labor) on the basis of model 1 (n = 5844)
*Five right knees and four left knees with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 4were excluded from analysis (data from the contralateral knees were retained)
Mg magnesium, N number, CI confidence interval
Basic characteristics of the study population in XO Study I (n = 1316)
| Tertiles of serum Mg (mmol/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (≤0.89) | 2 (0.90-0.95) | 3 (≥0.96) | |
| Number | 490 | 400 | 426 |
| Median Mg level (mmol/L) | 0.85 | 0.92 | 1.00 |
| Sex (female, %) | 48.6 | 50.3 | 55.2 |
| Age (years) | 63.6 ± 8.9 | 63.3 ± 8.4 | 61.6 ± 8.5 |
| 50–59 (%) | 37.1 | 36.3 | 46.4 |
| 60–69 (%) | 36.3 | 40.0 | 34.9 |
| ≥70 (%) | 26.7 | 23.8 | 18.7 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.1 ± 3.5 | 24.3 ± 3.9 | 24.3 ± 3.4 |
| < 25 (%) | 67.6 | 61.0 | 59.9 |
| ≥25 (%) | 32.4 | 39.0 | 40.1 |
| Knee injury (yes, %) | 5.5 | 3.8 | 5.2 |
| Serum PTH (μmol/L) | 52.5 ± 38.0 | 54.8 ± 23.1 | 51.3 ± 20.2 |
| Serum iron (μmol/L) | 20.2 ± 8.6 | 19.8 ± 7.2 | 20.3 ± 7.8 |
| Serum TIBC (μmol/L) | 58.3 ± 11.3 | 59.1 ± 11.6 | 60.2 ± 11.4 |
| Serum UIBC (μmol/L) | 38.2 ± 13.5 | 39.5 ± 13.2 | 40.0 ± 13.1 |
| Serum calcium (mmol/L) | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.1 |
| Serum 25(OH)D (μg/L) | 25.8 ± 11.3 | 24.9 ± 9.9 | 25.9 ± 10.9 |
| Serum zinc (μmol/L) | 17.3 ± 3.5 | 18.5 ± 3.7 | 19.9 ± 6.1 |
| Serum copper (μmol/L) | 16.3 ± 3.2 | 16.4 ± 3.7 | 16.8 ± 3.5 |
| Serum phosphorus (mmol/L) | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 |
| Education (educated, %) | 70.2 | 66.5 | 67.8 |
| Occupation (farmer, %) | 85.5 | 87.3 | 85.7 |
Mg magnesium, BMI body mass index, PTH parathyroid hormone, TIBC, total iron binding capacity, UIBC unsaturated iron-binding capacity
Fig. 3Dose-response relationship between serum magnesium (Mg) and the odds ratio (OR) for knee chondrocalcinosis (CC) in the XO Study I. CI, confidence interval
Association between serum Mg and knee chondrocalcinosis of study population in the XO Study I (n = 1316)
| Tertiles of serum Mg (mmol/L) |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (≤0.89) | 2 (0.90–0.95) | 3 (≥0.96) | ||
| Total | ||||
|
| 977 | 793 | 848 | - |
| Knee chondrocalcinosis (%) | 4.8 | 3.2 | 2.0 | - |
| Model 1 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.67 (0.34, 1.30) | 0.45 (0.21, 0.94) | 0.030 |
| Model 2 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.68 (0.35, 1.32) | 0.45 (0.22, 0.94) | 0.046 |
| Model 3 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.73 (0.37, 1.47) | 0.41 (0.18, 0.93) | 0.028 |
| Model 4 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.71 (0.35, 1.41) | 0.41 (0.18, 0.91) | 0.025 |
| Model 5 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.73 (0.37, 1.46) | 0.42 (0.19, 0.94) | 0.032 |
| Model 6 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.71 (0.36, 1.41) | 0.40 (0.18, 0.91) | 0.024 |
| Model 7 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.67 (0.34, 1.30) | 0.45 (0.21, 0.94) | 0.030 |
| Model 8 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.69 (0.35, 1.34) | 0.45 (0.21, 0.95) | 0.032 |
| Model 9 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.71 (0.36, 1.42) | 0.43 (0.20, 0.95) | 0.020 |
| Model 10 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.68 (0.35, 1.33) | 0.41 (0.19, 0.88) | 0.034 |
| Model 11 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.68 (0.35, 1.32) | 0.45 (0.21, 0.95) | 0.033 |
| Model 12 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.65 (0.33, 1.28) | 0.46 (0.21, 0.96) | 0.036 |
| Male | ||||
|
| 502 | 397 | 380 | - |
| Knee chondrocalcinosis (%) | 3.8 | 2.5 | 1.1 | - |
| Model 1 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.72 (0.26, 2.01) | 0.34 (0.08, 1.37) | 0.115 |
| Model 2 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.75 (0.28, 2.05) | 0.34 (0.08, 1.38) | 0.114 |
| Model 3 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.81 (0.29, 2.30) | 0.39 (0.09, 1.66) | 0.195 |
| Model 4 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.78 (0.28, 2.21) | 0.39 (0.09, 1.62) | 0.184 |
| Model 5 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.87 (0.31, 2.48) | 0.40 (0.10, 1.64) | 0.198 |
| Model 6 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.84 (0.30, 2.35) | 0.39 (0.09, 1.60) | 0.183 |
| Model 7 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.72 (0.26, 2.00) | 0.34 (0.09, 1.37) | 0.117 |
| Model 8 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.65 (0.19, 2.25) | 0.47 (0.11, 1.88) | 0.254 |
| Model 9 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.81 (0.27, 2.42) | 0.21 (0.04, 1.08) | 0.077 |
| Model 10 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.72 (0.26, 2.00) | 0.17 (0.04, 0.83) | 0.024 |
| Model 11 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.63 (0.23, 1.74) | 0.32 (0.08, 1.32) | 0.094 |
| Model 12 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.67 (0.24, 1.93) | 0.34 (0.08, 1.38) | 0.116 |
| Female | ||||
|
| 475 | 396 | 468 | - |
| Knee chondrocalcinosis (%) | 5.9 | 3.8 | 2.8 | - |
| Model 1 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.64 (0.27, 1.52) | 0.50 (0.20, 1.23) | 0.128 |
| Model 2 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.65 (0.27, 1.55) | 0.50 (0.20, 1.24) | 0.130 |
| Model 3 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.66 (0.27, 1.65) | 0.40 (0.15, 1.10) | 0.069 |
| Model 4 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.62 (0.25, 1.54) | 0.40 (0.14, 1.09) | 0.067 |
| Model 5 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.66 (0.26, 1.63) | 0.42 (0.15, 1.17) | 0.090 |
| Model 6 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.63 (0.25, 1.58) | 0.41 (0.15, 1.10) | 0.071 |
| Model 7 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.64 (0.27, 1.53) | 0.50 (0.20, 1.23) | 0.126 |
| Model 8 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.66 (0.27, 1.59) | 0.50 (0.20, 1.23) | 0.129 |
| Model 9 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.66 (0.27, 1.59) | 0.53 (0.21, 1.33) | 0.174 |
| Model 10 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.66 (0.27, 1.60) | 0.53 (0.21, 1.32) | 0.171 |
| Model 11 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.68 (0.29, 1.64) | 0.52 (0.21, 1.28) | 0.149 |
| Model 12 (95% CI) | 1.00 (reference) | 0.63 (0.26, 1.50) | 0.48 (0.19, 1.21) | 0.116 |
Model 1 included age (50–59, 60–69, ≥70 years), body mass index (BMI) (<25, ≥25 kg/m2) and sex (age and BMI for the sex subgroup) (n = 1316)
Model 2 added knee injury on the basis of model 1 (n = 1316)
Model 3 added serum parathyroid hormone (tertiles) on the basis of model 1 (n = 1250)
Model 4 added serum iron (tertiles) on the basis of model 1 (n = 1250)
Model 5 added serum total iron binding capacity (tertiles) on the basis of model 1 (n = 1241)
Model 6 added serum unsaturated iron binding capacity (tertiles) on the basis of model 1 (n = 1241)
Model 7 added serum calcium (tertiles) on the basis of model 1 (n = 1316)
Model 8 added serum 25(OH)D (tertiles) on the basis of model 1 (n = 1306)
Model 9 added serum zinc (tertiles) on the basis of model 1 (n = 1292)
Model 10 added serum copper (tertiles) on the basis of model 1 (n = 1292)
Model 11 added serum phosphorus (tertiles) on the basis of model 1 (n = 1316)
Model 12 added education (educated, non-educated) and occupation (farmer, non-farmer) on the basis of model 1 (n = 1316)
*Six right knees and eight left knees with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 4 were excluded from analysis (data from the contralateral knees were retained)
Mg magnesium, CI confidence interval
Fig. 4Association between serum magnesium (Mg) and predicted prevalence of chondrocalcinosis (CC) analyzed by spline regression in the XO Study I