| Literature DB >> 29065676 |
Ju Hwan Lee1, Yoo Na Hwang2, Ga Young Kim2, Eun Seok Shin3, Sung Min Kim1,2.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to characterize cardiovascular tissue components and analyze the different tissue properties for predicting coronary vulnerable plaque from intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images. For this purpose, sequential IVUS image frames were obtained from human coronary arteries using 20 MHz catheters. The plaque regions between the intima and media-adventitial borders were manually segmented in all IVUS images. Tissue components of the plaque regions were classified into having fibrous tissue (FT), fibrofatty tissue (FFT), necrotic core (NC), or dense calcium (DC). The media area and lumen diameter were also estimated simultaneously. In addition, the external elastic membrane (EEM) was computed to predict the vulnerable plaque after the tissue characterization. The reliability of manual segmentation was validated in terms of inter- and intraobserver agreements. The quantitative results found that the FT and the media as well as the NC would be good indicators for predicting vulnerable plaques in IVUS images. In addition, the lumen was not suitable for early diagnosis of vulnerable plaque because of the low significance compared to the other vessel parameters. To predict vulnerable plaque rupture, future study should have additional experiments using various tissue components, such as the EEM, FT, NC, and media.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29065676 PMCID: PMC5320383 DOI: 10.1155/2017/9837280
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1One example of the recorded IVUS images: (a) grayscale and (b) corresponding VH-IVUS images (MA: media to adventitia).
A total of 12 evaluation parameters obtained from the IVUS image sequences including area and diameter groups.
| Evaluation parameters | |
|---|---|
| Area | Lumen, fibrous, fibrolipidic, lipid core, calcified, media |
| Diameter | Maximum lumen diameter, minimum lumen diameter, average lumen diameter, maximum vessel diameter, minimum vessel diameter, average vessel diameter |
Figure 2Validation indexes of the (a) original IVUS image, such as (b) area, vessel perimeter, (c) maximum lumen diameter, and (d) maximum vessel diameter.
IEA and IRA analyses of the manual tracing in terms of all validation indexes including A, VP, MLD, and MVD.
| A | VP | MLD | MVD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEA | AD | 43.11 ± 525.21 | 2.284 ± 5.68 | 0.91 ± 3.68 | 2.44 ± 3.64 |
|
| 0.981 | 0.993 | 0.971 | 0.975 | |
| IRA | AD | 38.77 ± 584.86 | 1.54 ± 6.11 | 1.02 ± 3.90 | 2.14 ± 3.69 |
|
| 0.977 | 0.991 | 0.967 | 0.974 | |
Data: mean ± standard deviation, IEA: interobserver agreement, IRA: intraobserver agreement, AD: average difference, r: correlation coefficient, A: area, VP: vessel perimeter, MLD: maximum lumen diameter, and MVD: maximum vessel diameter. p < 0.05.
Figure 3Linear regression plots for the manual segmentation between two experts (IEA) in terms of validation indexes including (a) A, (b) VP, (c) MLD, and (d) MVD.
Figure 4Linear regression plots for the manual segmentation within two experts (IRA) in terms of validation indexes including (a) A, (b) VP, (c) MLD, and (d) MVD.
Comparison of the statistical significance levels between evaluation parameters and EEMs in terms of area and perimeter.
| Evaluation parameters | EEM area | EEM perimeter | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Lumen area | 0.502 | <0.001 | 0.454 | <0.001 |
| Fibrous area | 0.775 | 0.791 | ||
| Fibrolipidic area | 0.586 | 0.580 | ||
| Lipid core area | 0.748 | 0.761 | ||
| Calcified area | 0.520 | 0.534 | ||
| Media area | 0.855 | 0.859 | ||
| Minimum lumen diameter | 0.312 | 0.271 | ||
| Minimum vessel diameter | 0.974 | 0.978 | ||
| Maximum lumen diameter | 0.515 | 0.480 | ||
| Maximum vessel diameter | 0.979 | 0.989 | ||
| Average lumen diameter | 0.451 | 0.411 | ||
| Average vessel diameter | 0.993 | 0.999 | ||
r: correlation coefficient.